Re: net/yt to www/yt?

2009-01-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/01/06 08:16, Thomas Pfaff wrote: On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:43:00 + (UTC) na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote: Thomas Pfaff tpf...@tp76.info wrote: To download youtube movies, we have net/yt and www/youtube-dl. Why are they not in the same category? Because our

net/yt to www/yt?

2009-01-05 Thread Thomas Pfaff
Hi. To download youtube movies, we have net/yt and www/youtube-dl. Why are they not in the same category? I think net/yt should be moved to www/yt (or perhaps vice versa).

Re: net/yt to www/yt?

2009-01-05 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Thomas Pfaff tpf...@tp76.info wrote: To download youtube movies, we have net/yt and www/youtube-dl. Why are they not in the same category? Because our categories are imperfect and in retrospect some ports have been awkwardly placed. I think net/yt should be moved to www/yt (or perhaps vice

Re: net/yt to www/yt?

2009-01-05 Thread Thomas Pfaff
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:43:00 + (UTC) na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote: Thomas Pfaff tpf...@tp76.info wrote: To download youtube movies, we have net/yt and www/youtube-dl. Why are they not in the same category? Because our categories are imperfect and in retrospect some