Hi,
after the previous thread back in November has gone sideways,
here is another attempt.
Please find attached a port for opensmtpd filter-clamav.
Please, only port-wise comments.
OKs?
Thanks,
Regards,
Joerg
clamav.tar.gz
Description: application/tar-gz
I'll jump in since I wrote the other filters that aren't in C...
November 13, 2019 7:04 AM, "Martijn van Duren"
wrote:
> [...]
>
> I do however dislike the trend that every single filters in ports not
> written by me is in go. At first I thought this was to display the
> flexibility of the
On 2019/11/13 16:39, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:25:17 +0100, Tim Kuijsten wrote:
> > "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> > > I'll add my voice to this.
> > >
> > > The powerful vendors writing new languages must expand their breath,
> > > or face the consequences that some software is
> On 13. Nov 2019, at 16:59, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
> Strictly speaking, martijn@ is right.
Thanks for the elaborations and clarification.
I will adjust that with the next release.
>> is just not very readable and multiple arguments have always
>> non-optional predecessors anyways.
>
>
Hi Joerg,
Joerg Jung wrote on Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:55:17PM +0100:
> martijn@ wrote:
>> Also the manpage is incorrect. It states [address] [limit], while
>> if you want to limit the address is non-optional (from reading the
>> code). So this should be [address [limit]].
Strictly speaking,
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:25:17 +0100, Tim Kuijsten wrote:
> "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> > I'll add my voice to this.
> >
> > The powerful vendors writing new languages must expand their breath,
> > or face the consequences that some software is not going to get written
> > in their languages. Better
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:13:36PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I'll add my voice to this.
>
> The powerful vendors writing new languages must expand their breath,
> or face the consequences that some software is not going to get written
> in their languages. Better is very much muted by
"Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> I'll add my voice to this.
>
> The powerful vendors writing new languages must expand their breath,
> or face the consequences that some software is not going to get written
> in their languages. Better is very much muted by unportable.
What about gccgo? It supports
I'll add my voice to this.
The powerful vendors writing new languages must expand their breath,
or face the consequences that some software is not going to get written
in their languages. Better is very much muted by unportable.
> Hello Joerg,
>
> No objections from me portswise (although I'm
Hello Joerg,
No objections from me portswise (although I'm no authority).
I do however dislike the trend that every single filters in ports not
written by me is in go. At first I thought this was to display the
flexibility of the smtpd-api (I even recollect it was said, but I can't
find the mail
Hi,
please find attached a port for opensmtpd filter-clamav.
Comments, OKs?
Thanks,
Regards,
Joerg
clamav.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
11 matches
Mail list logo
