On 2019/05/01 22:01, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> ... this time I've got my tar incantation correct.
>
> Matthew
>
I've fixed it up slightly; added $OpenBSD$ markers for cvs to write its IDs.
This version is OK sthen@ if somebody would like to import.
Your tar did not include a subdirectory; for fu
... this time I've got my tar incantation correct.
Matthew
p5-Unix-Pledge-0.006.tgz
Description: p5-Unix-Pledge-0.006.tgz
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2019/05/01 19:42, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> > What would I put in WANTLIB? The only dependency this module has is
> > OpenBSD 6.4's base system (well strictly speaking, a libc with the
> > pledge and unveil calls).
>
> WANTLIB += c perl
I guess I got unlucky:
void:/us
Hi Matthew,
cho...@jtan.com wrote on Wed, May 01, 2019 at 07:42:40PM +0300:
> Stuart Henderson writes:
>> Missing license marker and WANTLIB.
> What would I put in WANTLIB? The only dependency this module has is
> OpenBSD 6.4's base system (well strictly speaking, a libc with the
> pledge and u
On 2019/05/01 19:42, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> Stuart Henderson writes:
> > Please send tars not diffs for new ports.
>
> Will do.
>
> > Missing license marker and WANTLIB.
>
> What would I put in WANTLIB? The only dependency this module has is
> OpenBSD 6.4's base system (well strictly speaking,
Stuart Henderson writes:
> Please send tars not diffs for new ports.
Will do.
> Missing license marker and WANTLIB.
What would I put in WANTLIB? The only dependency this module has is
OpenBSD 6.4's base system (well strictly speaking, a libc with the
pledge and unveil calls).
I can't find examp
On 2019/05/01 12:40, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> I've sat on this for a while because a) my email setup broke when I
> upgraded my mail client, and b) while I was dealing with that I got a
> message from the upstream author indicating that he's incorporating my
> patch, which makes the diff included b
I've sat on this for a while because a) my email setup broke when I
upgraded my mail client, and b) while I was dealing with that I got a
message from the upstream author indicating that he's incorporating my
patch, which makes the diff included below an awful lot smaller.
On balance, saying that
