Le Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 02:34:35PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> On Fri Feb 09, 2024 at 08:02:41PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > Le Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 10:26:18AM +, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> > > On 2024/02/09 10:14, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > Is the "remove qtwebkit" approach
On Fri Feb 09, 2024 at 08:02:41PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Le Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 10:26:18AM +, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> > On 2024/02/09 10:14, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Is the "remove qtwebkit" approach because it's causing an actual
> > > problem, or is it just that it's old?
Le Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 10:26:18AM +, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> On 2024/02/09 10:14, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Is the "remove qtwebkit" approach because it's causing an actual
> > problem, or is it just that it's old? Can we switch to qtwebengine where
> > possible but still keep qtwebkit
On 2024/02/09 10:14, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Is the "remove qtwebkit" approach because it's causing an actual
> problem, or is it just that it's old? Can we switch to qtwebengine where
> possible but still keep qtwebkit for things where it's still needed
> for certain software to work properly?
Is the "remove qtwebkit" approach because it's causing an actual
problem, or is it just that it's old? Can we switch to qtwebengine where
possible but still keep qtwebkit for things where it's still needed
for certain software to work properly? Rendering local HTML files isn't
a particularly high
Le Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 08:19:12AM +0100, Landry Breuil a écrit :
> Le Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 09:06:44PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> > On Thu Feb 08, 2024 at 07:54:26PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > Le Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:12:17PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> > > > Here is a
Le Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 09:06:44PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> On Thu Feb 08, 2024 at 07:54:26PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > Le Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:12:17PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> > > Here is a simple diff to remove qtwebkit from. I modified configure.py
> > > to make
On Thu Feb 08, 2024 at 07:54:26PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Le Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:12:17PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> > Here is a simple diff to remove qtwebkit from. I modified configure.py
> > to make sure it will not picked up even it is present.
> >
> > OK?
>
> obvious
Le Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:12:17PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> Here is a simple diff to remove qtwebkit from. I modified configure.py
> to make sure it will not picked up even it is present.
>
> OK?
obvious question, but all the runtime consumers of py-qt5 been checked
for not actually
Here is a simple diff to remove qtwebkit from. I modified configure.py
to make sure it will not picked up even it is present.
OK?
diff --git a/x11/py-qt5/Makefile b/x11/py-qt5/Makefile
index e122384c90f..8848bfd29e5 100644
--- a/x11/py-qt5/Makefile
+++ b/x11/py-qt5/Makefile
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
10 matches
Mail list logo
