Re: removing unnecessary workarounds for ports with gcc4 + amd64/sparc64

2010-06-12 Thread Landry Breuil
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 06:32:18PM -0400, Brad wrote: > On Saturday 12 June 2010 03:32:47 Landry Breuil wrote: > > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:40:45PM -0400, Brad wrote: > > > Now that the system compiler has been updated to gcc4 for amd64 and > > > sparc64 that allows for a bunch of workarounds in

Re: removing unnecessary workarounds for ports with gcc4 + amd64/sparc64

2010-06-12 Thread Brad
On Saturday 12 June 2010 03:32:47 Landry Breuil wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:40:45PM -0400, Brad wrote: > > Now that the system compiler has been updated to gcc4 for amd64 and > > sparc64 that allows for a bunch of workarounds in the ports tree to be > > removed. > > > > None of the ICEs or

Re: removing unnecessary workarounds for ports with gcc4 + amd64/sparc64

2010-06-12 Thread Landry Breuil
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:40:45PM -0400, Brad wrote: > Now that the system compiler has been updated to gcc4 for amd64 and sparc64 > that allows for a bunch of workarounds in the ports tree to be removed. > > None of the ICEs or "eating too much memory / taking too long to compile" > issues happe

removing unnecessary workarounds for ports with gcc4 + amd64/sparc64

2010-05-30 Thread Brad
Now that the system compiler has been updated to gcc4 for amd64 and sparc64 that allows for a bunch of workarounds in the ports tree to be removed. None of the ICEs or "eating too much memory / taking too long to compile" issues happen anymore with sparc64 and the regress test for libslang on amd6