Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-05-10 Thread TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
On 5/10/06, steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks better. Still some unneeded directories (probably you don't have all the relevant package tgz files present in your packages directory). You are right. Fixed. Is there any documentation you can install with this software? Added

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-05-09 Thread steven mestdagh
TAKAHASHI Tamotsu [2006-05-09, 00:06:38]: Here is the port I'm currently using: http://www10.plala.or.jp/sanrinsha/tamo/scim_20060508.tgz you have quite a lot of @comment lines in PLIST. try setting LIBTOOL_FLAGS=--tag=disable-static also, do not comment the LC_MESSAGES directories...

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-05-08 Thread Nikolay Sturm
* TAKAHASHI Tamotsu [2006-05-08]: Sure: http://www10.plala.or.jp/sanrinsha/tamo/scim_20060508.diff But this is just a diff against /dev/null because SCIM is not in the tree. And patch-mlterm293-20060508 _is_ a unified diff against -current, I think. Sorry, my bad, I was confused.

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-05-08 Thread steven mestdagh
TAKAHASHI Tamotsu [2006-05-08, 01:00:01]: Hi, As Ash seems away, I'd like to be the maintainer of SCIM port if I don't need to remove -1.0 suffix using 17 patches (because it's too heavy for me to maintain). did you get an answer from upstream about controlling this with some variable

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-05-07 Thread TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
Hi, As Ash seems away, I'd like to be the maintainer of SCIM port if I don't need to remove -1.0 suffix using 17 patches (because it's too heavy for me to maintain). Here is the port I'm currently using: http://www10.plala.or.jp/sanrinsha/tamo/scim_20060508.tgz And mlterm-2.9.3 with SCIM

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-05-07 Thread Nikolay Sturm
* TAKAHASHI Tamotsu [2006-05-07]: Here is the port I'm currently using: http://www10.plala.or.jp/sanrinsha/tamo/scim_20060508.tgz And mlterm-2.9.3 with SCIM support is here: http://www10.plala.or.jp/sanrinsha/tamo/patch-mlterm293-20060508 Please provide unified diffs against -current.

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-05-07 Thread TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
On 5/8/06, Nikolay Sturm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * TAKAHASHI Tamotsu [2006-05-07]: Here is the port I'm currently using: http://www10.plala.or.jp/sanrinsha/tamo/scim_20060508.tgz And mlterm-2.9.3 with SCIM support is here: http://www10.plala.or.jp/sanrinsha/tamo/patch-mlterm293-20060508

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-04-17 Thread Tamo
On 4/15/06, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 02:20:35PM +0900, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote: Nevermind, this is just a warning. If you are using SCIM with no problem, there's no problem. in this case, it is not a problem because -liconv is already part of the link

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-04-17 Thread Tamo
On 4/13/06, steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - can you get rid of the -1.0 suffix for the shared library names? hint: avoid libtool's -release flag - is it possible to remove the versions in directory names, i.e. try to make scim-1.0 - scim. (don't bother about gtk-2.0 though..)

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-04-14 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 02:20:35PM +0900, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote: * Tue Apr 11 2006 Ash Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] And libtool-linker warns that its dynamically-linking capability may be disabled because several static libraries are linked (e.g. libiconv.a, libintl.a, and libgcc.a).

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-04-13 Thread TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
* Tue Apr 11 2006 Ash Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] And libtool-linker warns that its dynamically-linking capability may be disabled because several static libraries are linked (e.g. libiconv.a, libintl.a, and libgcc.a). I'm afraid this warning is not a false positive. SCIM-SKK doesn't work

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-04-13 Thread Ash Williams
some suggestions - remove unneeded PKGNAME done - can you use MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE ? yes, done - can you get rid of the -1.0 suffix for the shared library names? hint: avoid libtool's -release flag no - this leads to a few compile errors - is it possible to remove the versions in

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-04-12 Thread TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
* Tue Apr 11 2006 Ash Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 11/04/06, TAKAHASHI Tamotsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: // And note: scim-skk-0.5.2 is buggy. I think i should add here that i have tried scim with scim-anthy (which i'll submit after scim has been committed) works fine with scim - perhaps

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-04-12 Thread steven mestdagh
i have trouble reading your tar.gz $ tar tzvf scim.tar.gz gzip: stdin: unrecognized file format Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-04-11 Thread Ash Williams
See attached file scim-1.4.4 Glad to see the port. Good job! Please test, people. Has been tested on -current i386 make lib-depends-check complains something. (Have you followed http://www.openbsd.org/checklist.html ?) And libtool-linker warns that its dynamically-linking capability

Re: scim-1.4.4 testing

2006-04-09 Thread Ash Williams
On 09/04/06, Ash Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See attached file scim-1.4.4 Please test, people. Has been tested on -current i386 All feedback welcome ^_^ Can someone please commit this