* Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse [2006-02-07]:
> But why isn't clisp marked broken then? It's quite obvious it doesn't
> work.
It's marked ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=i386, no idea about its status, though.
Nikolay
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 21:35:07 +0100
Nikolay Sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse [2006-02-07]:
> > > math/maxima clisp not for sparc
>
> There is nothing to fix here. clisp is only for i386 and maxima,
> theoretically, works EVERYWHERE, where there is a clisp
* Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse [2006-02-07]:
> > math/maxima clisp not for sparc
There is nothing to fix here. clisp is only for i386 and maxima,
theoretically, works EVERYWHERE, where there is a clisp. So when clisp
will work on sparc, we'll see what happens with maxima. We only mark
ports b
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 20:15:37 +0100
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 19:41:09 -0700
> Peter Valchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > security/p5-Digest-MD5-M4p M4p.xs:135: stray '\' in program
>
> That file is in DOS format, that's what broke it, and made
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 19:41:09 -0700
Peter Valchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> math/maxima clisp not for sparc
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/math/maxima/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 Makefile
---
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 19:41:09 -0700
Peter Valchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> security/p5-Digest-MD5-M4pM4p.xs:135: stray '\' in program
That file is in DOS format, that's what broke it, and made gcc2
choke on it. I fixed it on my alpha, and I assume it works too
on the sparc.
This fix is qui
Antoine Jacoutot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > www/cssed ScintillaGTK.cxx:1164: syntax error before `>='
>
> Anyone could have a look at it ?
Fixed. A number of source files have trailing carriage returns
(i.e., Microsoft end of line format). gcc usually doesn't care,
it's just trailing whi
Selon Peter Valchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> www/cssed ScintillaGTK.cxx:1164: syntax error before `>='
Unfortunately, I have no sparc around and no architecture that uses gcc2 either
to try to fix this.
Anyone could have a look at it ?
Thanks!
--
Antoine
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 07:41:09PM -0700, Peter Valchev wrote:
> Just copied fresh sparc and macppc packages snapshots.
>
> There is a fairly extensive breakage on sparc, there are 59 broken
> ports and as a result a total of 354 packages are missing (due to
> dependencies). This is of course to
Just copied fresh sparc and macppc packages snapshots.
There is a fairly extensive breakage on sparc, there are 59 broken
ports and as a result a total of 354 packages are missing (due to
dependencies). This is of course to be expected, since sparc is
one of the few architectures remaining to use
10 matches
Mail list logo
