On Fri, 9 May 2008, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> I am not sure I understand your last question. How can you do typesetting
> without displaying graphics?
Uh, with a LaserJet 5? With an actual digital printing press?
Or you don't look at it on the machine where it resides?
TeX is used a lot for
Am 09.05.2008 um 12:31 schrieb Predrag Punosevac:
Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 02:24:56AM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
I am not sure I understand your last question. How can you do
typesetting without displaying graphics?
TeXLive does not require X for processing but in o
Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 02:24:56AM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
I am not sure I understand your last question. How can you do typesetting
without displaying graphics?
TeXLive does not require X for processing but in order to see your document
you need to use xdvi, gho
Olivier Mehani wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 10:23:46AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
I've been trying to find TeX for 4.3 but can not find it in ports.
teTeX is obsolete and unmaintained for more than three years. TeXLive is
the next standard TeX distribution for Unix
and Unix
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 10:23:46AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> > I've been trying to find TeX for 4.3 but can not find it in ports.
> Edd Barrett has done a lot of work on porting TeXLive, the actively
> maintained TeX distribution. This ought to provide you with what
> you're looking for.
Are y
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 12:36:53AM -0700, Daniel Thomas Nevistic wrote:
> I've been trying to find TeX for 4.3 but can not find it in ports.
>
> I believe that teTeX is the UNIX TeX program which has TeX and the LaTeX2e
> macros package for it.
>
> Does anybody know whe
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 12:36:53AM -0700, Daniel Thomas Nevistic wrote:
> I've been trying to find TeX for 4.3 but can not find it in ports.
>
> I believe that teTeX is the UNIX TeX program which has TeX and the LaTeX2e
> macros package for it.
>
> Does anybody know whe
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 12:36:53AM -0700, Daniel Thomas Nevistic wrote:
> I've been trying to find TeX for 4.3 but can not find it in ports.
> I believe that teTeX is the UNIX TeX program which has TeX and the LaTeX2e
> macros package for it.
Same here. I updated from 4.2 to 4.3
I've been trying to find TeX for 4.3 but can not find it in ports.
I believe that teTeX is the UNIX TeX program which has TeX and the LaTeX2e
macros package for it.
Does anybody know where I can find TeX? -Dan
Daniel Nevistic
Electrical Engineering
University of Washington
206.818.1127
> Original Message
> Subject: Evince depends upon teTeX?
> From: "Edd Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, May 15, 2007 4:42 pm
> To: ports@openbsd.org
>
> Hi there,
>
> Does anyone know why evince needs teTeX to run?
to show .d
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 09:42:20PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Does anyone know why evince needs teTeX to run?
It needs kpathsea for dvi support.
> Will I need to do anything with TeXLive regarding this?
No, not really, since your TeXLive base package is very similar to
teTeX base (
Hi there,
Does anyone know why evince needs teTeX to run?
Will I need to do anything with TeXLive regarding this?
Thanks
--
Best Regards
Edd
---
http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett/
2007/3/29, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
So I guess there is no maintained version of latex for unix?
Furthermore a texlive port would make no difference.
LaTeX is not a program. If you don't know this, shut up.
TeXLive has already been split up into packages for debian, and _that_
work wou
On 3/29/07, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
It appears teTeX has been stagnant for quite some time now. You can
read about its non-maintainance here:
http://www.tug.org/tetex.
As far as I know this is the only latex distribution for OpenBSD. Just
wondering if it would be
Hello,
It appears teTeX has been stagnant for quite some time now. You can
read about its non-maintainance here:
http://www.tug.org/tetex.
As far as I know this is the only latex distribution for OpenBSD. Just
wondering if it would be useful to have texlive
(http://www.tug.org/texlive/) ported
this diff is for OPENBSD_3_9 to make teTeX fetch it's distfile again.
Index: print/teTeX/texmf/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/teTeX/texmf/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -r1.21 Makefile
--- print/teTeX/
* Tomasz Zielinski [2006-07-08]:
> > 1) tetex has a maintainer, he is the first person to contact (that's
> It is U :-) So first private mail, right?
Yes
> > 2) how about telling us WHICH file gives you a bad checksum
> tetex-texmf-3.0.tar.gz, I was thinking that it
Dnia 8-07-2006 o godz. 17:34 Nikolay Sturm napisał(a):
> * Tomasz Zielinski [2006-07-08]:
> > I cannot install TeTeX on OpenBSD 3.9-stable. Always get bad checksum
> > (downloading files from different servers)
>
> 1) tetex has a maintainer, he is the first person to contac
* Tomasz Zielinski [2006-07-08]:
> I cannot install TeTeX on OpenBSD 3.9-stable. Always get bad checksum
> (downloading files from different servers)
1) tetex has a maintainer, he is the first person to contact (that's me)
2) how about telling us WHICH file gives you a bad checksum
Nikolay
Hello,
I cannot install TeTeX on OpenBSD 3.9-stable. Always get bad checksum
(downloading files from different servers)
1. # cd /usr/ports/print/teTeX
2 # make install
Can somebody confirm that checksum does not match? Thank You.
--
Pozdrawienia/Regards
Tomasz Zielinski
Bachman Kharazmi [2006-06-05, 00:47:21]:
> Hi
>
> I try to install a latex replacement since I couldn't find it as a
> pkg, and teTeX looks to be a alternative.
> but when I try to pkg_add it in 3.8. I get:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/bkw/docs/ > sudo pkg_add
&
On Monday 05 June 2006 00:47, Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
> Hi
>
> I try to install a latex replacement since I couldn't find it as a
> pkg, and teTeX looks to be a alternative.
> but when I try to pkg_add it in 3.8. I get:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/bkw/
Hi
I try to install a latex replacement since I couldn't find it as a
pkg, and teTeX looks to be a alternative.
but when I try to pkg_add it in 3.8. I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/bkw/docs/ > sudo pkg_add
ftp://ftp.stacken.kth.se/pub/OpenBSD/3.8/packages/i386/teTeX_base-3.0p3-no_x11.t
hi there,
i am trying to make ConTeXt work (can't get past missing fonts)
and in the process i upgraded pdftex, metapost and context itself.
here is a wiki about ConTeXt, and my contribution how to upgrade
all this stuff: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/OpenBSD_installation
(work in progress)
-f
full of binaries which will be never used on a
> > firewall?
>
> If you have enough disk space on your firewall/server, just install
> xbase and be done. If you don't have the space, you are on your own
> anyways and can just as well pull tetex/base/Makefile from -current and
7;t use, and xbase is full of binaries which will be never used on a
> firewall?
If you have enough disk space on your firewall/server, just install
xbase and be done. If you don't have the space, you are on your own
anyways and can just as well pull tetex/base/Makefile from -current and
build your own package with a correct no_x11 FLAVOR.
Now I need to get back to porting...
Nikolay
hmm, on Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 01:45:45PM +0100, Nikolay Sturm said that
> Now for your problem, you can just pull the -current port's Makefile to
> your 3.8 machine and it should work. Furthermore it is consensus among
> porters that installing xbase on a machine is not a problem, so the
> broken FL
* frantisek holop [2005-11-25]:
> > > could this be fixed for 3.8 release?
> >
> > no, only security/reliability issues are fixed in -stable.
> > you can try to backport the fixes from current, if you really need this.
>
> isn't this reliability?
In principal we only backport security fixes. If
situation,
> > > if this is fixed in current, disregard it.
> > >
> > > first of all here's the log of installing tetex no_x11:
> > >
> > > integer> sudo pkg_add teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11
> > > teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11:png-1.2.8: complete
&g
bout the new
> > rrdtools i sense some shift in what actually no_x11 means
> > or will mean in the future.
> >
> > please note that i am describing a 3.8 release situation,
> > if this is fixed in current, disregard it.
> >
> > first of all here's the
uture.
>
> please note that i am describing a 3.8 release situation,
> if this is fixed in current, disregard it.
>
> first of all here's the log of installing tetex no_x11:
>
> integer> sudo pkg_add teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11
> teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11:png-1.2
, disregard it.
first of all here's the log of installing tetex no_x11:
integer> sudo pkg_add teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11
teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11:png-1.2.8: complete
teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11:t1lib-5.0.0: complete
teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11:ghostscript-fonts-6.0: complete
Can't install ghost
Andreas Bartelt [Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 01:11:32PM +0200] wrote:
>after upgrading teTeX, I get the following errors (there were no errors
>before the upgrade):
>
>/usr/ports/infrastructure/build/out-of-date
><
>Collecting installed packages
>Collecting
Andreas Bartelt [Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 01:11:32PM +0200] wrote:
>after upgrading teTeX, I get the following errors (there were no errors
>before the upgrade):
>
>/usr/ports/infrastructure/build/out-of-date
><
>Collecting installed packages
>Collecting
Hi all,
after upgrading teTeX, I get the following errors (there were no errors
before the upgrade):
/usr/ports/infrastructure/build/out-of-date
<
Collecting installed packages
Collecting port versions: complete
"Makefile", line 49: Malformed conditional (defi
35 matches
Mail list logo
