Gilles Chehade wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 06:49:46PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 05:37:38PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> > Talking with landry@ we realized there aren't many ports that make
>sense under ports/palm.
>> > We are thinking about
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 06:49:46PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 05:37:38PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Talking with landry@ we realized there aren't many ports that make sense
> > under ports/palm.
> > We are thinking about trashing the entire category
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 05:37:38PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Talking with landry@ we realized there aren't many ports that make sense
> under ports/palm.
> We are thinking about trashing the entire category and keep only the
> following 3 ports for the time being:
> bibelot, palm-
Hi.
Talking with landry@ we realized there aren't many ports that make sense under
ports/palm.
We are thinking about trashing the entire category and keep only the following
3 ports for the time being:
bibelot, palm-bookmarks, palm2ical
Thoughts?
--
Antoine