On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:42 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
>
> another go, keep /etc/tinyproxy/
haven't tested it yet but looks good.
i will put it in my server and see how it goes.
f.-
another go, keep /etc/tinyproxy/
-f
--
a satisfied virgin is a virgin no longer.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/tinyproxy/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -p -u -r1.20 Makefile
--- Makefile22 Nov 2010 08
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 5:52 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 05:21:56PM +, Federico Schwindt said that
>> >[..]
>> >
>> > the port i sent does as mainstream.
>> > (nobody commented otherwise, i will do as requested)
>>
>> and? how much more are we going to wait?
>
> i
hmm, on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 05:21:56PM +, Federico Schwindt said that
> >[..]
> >
> > the port i sent does as mainstream.
> > (nobody commented otherwise, i will do as requested)
>
> and? how much more are we going to wait?
i am sorry, it's not clear to me at the moment
what is expected of m
>[..]
>
> the port i sent does as mainstream.
> (nobody commented otherwise, i will do as requested)
and? how much more are we going to wait?
f.-
hmm, on Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:20:23PM +, Federico Schwindt said that
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:52 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
> > hmm, on Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:33:49AM +, Stuart Henderson said that
> >> On 2012/02/22 23:26, frantisek holop wrote:
> >> > -configuration moved upstream f
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:52 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:33:49AM +, Stuart Henderson said that
>> On 2012/02/22 23:26, frantisek holop wrote:
>> > -configuration moved upstream from /etc/tinyproxy/
>> > to /etc/tinyproxy.conf
>>
>> oh *why* do they needlessly b
using cvs diff -uN
-f
--
let me show you the world in my eyes.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/tinyproxy/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -p -u -r1.20 Makefile
--- Makefile22 Nov 2010 08:36:54 -
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 06:54:02PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> here is another try.
>
> no /var/run directory in package, added rc_pre
Can you post a diff please.
--
Antoine
here is another try.
no /var/run directory in package, added rc_pre
-f
--
the best way to keep your word is not to give it.
tinyproxy.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
hmm, on Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:33:49AM +, Stuart Henderson said that
> On 2012/02/22 23:26, frantisek holop wrote:
> > -configuration moved upstream from /etc/tinyproxy/
> > to /etc/tinyproxy.conf
>
> oh *why* do they needlessly break people's installations like this...
do you want me to ove
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:26:39AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 07:54:41AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot said that
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:26:27PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> > > hi there,
> > >
> > > please find attached my update for tinyproxy.
> > >
> > > -
On 2012/02/22 23:26, frantisek holop wrote:
> -configuration moved upstream from /etc/tinyproxy/
> to /etc/tinyproxy.conf
oh *why* do they needlessly break people's installations like this...
hmm, on Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 07:54:41AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot said that
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:26:27PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> > hi there,
> >
> > please find attached my update for tinyproxy.
> >
> > -the license is now GPLv2 (was v3)
> >
> > -configuration moved upstream from /
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:26:27PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
>
> please find attached my update for tinyproxy.
>
> -the license is now GPLv2 (was v3)
>
> -configuration moved upstream from /etc/tinyproxy/
> to /etc/tinyproxy.conf
>
> i hope it's not a big problem that it's not i
hi there,
please find attached my update for tinyproxy.
-the license is now GPLv2 (was v3)
-configuration moved upstream from /etc/tinyproxy/
to /etc/tinyproxy.conf
i hope it's not a big problem that it's not in patch
format...
thanks to Federico G. Schwindt for prodding and something
to compa
16 matches
Mail list logo
