Re: transmission (+ natpmp?) vs rtable != 0 [was: Re: update: net/transmission 4.0.6]

2024-08-22 Thread Lucas Gabriel Vuotto
Bump for both. diff refs/heads/master ca80566646f333620cc5ea11733e8ebaf680ae68 commit - 5a27026115546cbe11607b1197c547e14886732e commit + ca80566646f333620cc5ea11733e8ebaf680ae68 blob - 43b62e7c1a177a807fa1566b1e12a546b2df3456 blob + 0a87b49cfb749682588085855666b840ea93326e --- net/miniupnp/libna

Re: transmission (+ natpmp?) vs rtable != 0 [was: Re: update: net/transmission 4.0.6]

2024-08-15 Thread Lucas Gabriel Vuotto
Bump for both. diff refs/heads/master ca80566646f333620cc5ea11733e8ebaf680ae68 commit - 5a27026115546cbe11607b1197c547e14886732e commit + ca80566646f333620cc5ea11733e8ebaf680ae68 blob - 43b62e7c1a177a807fa1566b1e12a546b2df3456 blob + 0a87b49cfb749682588085855666b840ea93326e --- net/miniupnp/libna

Re: transmission (+ natpmp?) vs rtable != 0 [was: Re: update: net/transmission 4.0.6]

2024-08-09 Thread Lucas Gabriel Vuotto
Bump for both. On Sun, Aug 04, 2024 at 10:17:06AM GMT, Josh Grosse wrote: > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 11:37:29PM +, Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote: > > The PR to upstream got merged, so here is an update for libnatpmp to > > the latest commit. There is a single non-merge commit [0] inbetween, > > wh

Re: transmission (+ natpmp?) vs rtable != 0 [was: Re: update: net/transmission 4.0.6]

2024-08-04 Thread Josh Grosse
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 11:37:29PM +, Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote: > The PR to upstream got merged, so here is an update for libnatpmp to > the latest commit. There is a single non-merge commit [0] inbetween, > which is to remove some explicit setting in CMake that became the > default when they

Re: transmission (+ natpmp?) vs rtable != 0 [was: Re: update: net/transmission 4.0.6]

2024-08-03 Thread Lucas Gabriel Vuotto
The PR to upstream got merged, so here is an update for libnatpmp to the latest commit. There is a single non-merge commit [0] inbetween, which is to remove some explicit setting in CMake that became the default when they bumped the minimum version to 3.5. Lucas [0]: https://github.com/m

Re: transmission (+ natpmp?) vs rtable != 0 [was: Re: update: net/transmission 4.0.6]

2024-08-03 Thread Josh Grosse
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 05:18:49PM +, Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 05:50:20PM GMT, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Does that match with when I updated libnatpmp? Or is that a bit earlier. > > No, that's too early. I've been running it in rtable 2 since 2023 and I > now kno

Re: transmission (+ natpmp?) vs rtable != 0 [was: Re: update: net/transmission 4.0.6]

2024-08-02 Thread Lucas Gabriel Vuotto
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 05:50:20PM GMT, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Does that match with when I updated libnatpmp? Or is that a bit earlier. No, that's too early. I've been running it in rtable 2 since 2023 and I now know for certain that it happened for me after I read this thread https://marc.info

Re: transmission (+ natpmp?) vs rtable != 0 [was: Re: update: net/transmission 4.0.6]

2024-08-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/08/02 14:31, Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 01:25:24PM GMT, Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote: > > > > btw, decided to attempt that after rereading your debug attempts in > > Reddit. I believe that you keep looking at the loop in curlThreadFunc > > because that's the way th

Re: transmission (+ natpmp?) vs rtable != 0 [was: Re: update: net/transmission 4.0.6]

2024-08-02 Thread Lucas Gabriel Vuotto
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 01:25:24PM GMT, Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 10:48:37AM GMT, Josh Grosse wrote: > > Ping. This is a bugfix release. Tested on amd64. -daemon still > > has a non-zero rtable issue reported with 4.0.5. > > So, given I was a victim of the rtable issu

transmission (+ natpmp?) vs rtable != 0 [was: Re: update: net/transmission 4.0.6]

2024-08-02 Thread Lucas Gabriel Vuotto
On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 10:48:37AM GMT, Josh Grosse wrote: > Ping. This is a bugfix release. Tested on amd64. -daemon still > has a non-zero rtable issue reported with 4.0.5. So, given I was a victim of the rtable issue, I took another attempt at it. Josh, do you see the issue if you run transm