Hi,
This updates leveldb from an svn snapshot to release 1.5.0.
One thing I'm not sure about is that I'm using upstream's shared library
major/minor numbers rather than setting it to 0.1 or something.
ok?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS fi
On 2012/08/16 13:52, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This updates leveldb from an svn snapshot to release 1.5.0.
>
> One thing I'm not sure about is that I'm using upstream's shared library
> major/minor numbers rather than setting it to 0.1 or something.
We use our own versioning for this, it
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012/08/16 13:52, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This updates leveldb from an svn snapshot to release 1.5.0.
>>
>> One thing I'm not sure about is that I'm using upstream's shared library
>> major/minor numbers rather than setting
The attached diff updates databases/leveldb to the latest version
(1.22).
The changelog can be viewed here:
https://github.com/google/leveldb/releases/tag/1.22
It seems the previous version (1.21) introduced a CMake build. But the
OpenBSD port had not yet adopted it. Here, I've updated the port
Another fun leveldb update. This updates from 1.22 to 1.23.
The change log is rather extensive and can be viewed here:
https://github.com/google/leveldb/releases/tag/1.23
There's a couple of fun things that they've done here. You might recall
also that the last update completely flipped the tabl
Ping.
Ashton Fagg writes:
> The attached diff updates databases/leveldb to the latest version
> (1.22).
>
> The changelog can be viewed here:
>
> https://github.com/google/leveldb/releases/tag/1.22
>
> It seems the previous version (1.21) introduced a CMake build. But the
> OpenBSD port had not
On 2021/02/28 10:08, Ashton Fagg wrote:
> Another fun leveldb update. This updates from 1.22 to 1.23.
>
> The change log is rather extensive and can be viewed here:
>
> https://github.com/google/leveldb/releases/tag/1.23
>
> There's a couple of fun things that they've done here. You might recall
Stuart Henderson writes:
> They haven't built tarballs themselves to distribute, but are relying on
> github auto-generating them. These don't include submodules (because
> git-archive doesn't include them).
Ah, that makes sense. I had wondered if it was an oversight on their
part, but they may
Ping again.
> Ashton Fagg writes:
>
>> The attached diff updates databases/leveldb to the latest version
>> (1.22).
>>
>> The changelog can be viewed here:
>>
>> https://github.com/google/leveldb/releases/tag/1.22
>>
>> It seems the previous version (1.21) introduced a CMake build. But the
>> Ope
On 2020/12/15 10:18, Ashton Fagg wrote:
> Ping again.
>
> > Ashton Fagg writes:
> >
> >> The attached diff updates databases/leveldb to the latest version
> >> (1.22).
I'll take care of this, a few comments inline:
> >>
> >> The changelog can be viewed here:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/google/
On 2020/12/15 15:55, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > -#'atomic_pointer.h: error Please implement AtomicPointer for this
> > platform' on other archs
> > -ONLY_FOR_ARCHS = i386 amd64
> > +#'atomic_pointer.h: error Please implement AtomicPointer for this
> > +# platform' on other archs
> > +ONLY_FOR_A
11 matches
Mail list logo
