Jacob Meuser wrote:
probably. maybe this patch (picked from ffmpeg svn some time ago)
helps? ffmpeg really needs to be updated ...
The patch fixes the segfault but the regression tests which uses ffmpeg
still fails.
Ok to add this patch to ffmpeg port ?
Cheers
Giovanni
Index: Makefile
===
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 07:12:09PM +0200, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> ImageMagick updated to 6.5.3.2, some regression tests (which uses
> ffmpeg) fails and ffmpeg segfaults in put_pixels_clamped_mmx
> (libavcodec.so.13.0) @amd64.
> Does anybody knows if is a known ffmpeg bug ?
probably. maybe this
ImageMagick updated to 6.5.3.2, some regression tests (which uses
ffmpeg) fails and ffmpeg segfaults in put_pixels_clamped_mmx
(libavcodec.so.13.0) @amd64.
Does anybody knows if is a known ffmpeg bug ?
Cheers & Thanks
Giovanni
Index: Makefile
==
On Thu 2008.11.06 at 08:20 +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Okan Demirmen wrote:
>
> > new diff, plus a few others.
> >
> > graphics_ImageMagick.diff:
> > - update ImageMagick to 6.4.5-3
> >(supersedes graphics/p5-PerlMagick)
> >
> > comms_xastir.diff:
> > graphics_inksc
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> new diff, plus a few others.
>
> graphics_ImageMagick.diff:
> - update ImageMagick to 6.4.5-3
>(supersedes graphics/p5-PerlMagick)
>
> comms_xastir.diff:
> graphics_inkscape.diff:
> multimedia_dvdauthor.diff:
> net_kismet.diff:
> www_webgui.diff:
>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 05:53:21PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> which tests fail?
> sparc64 has failures (with segfaults) on the DPX tests.
>
i386 fails only on FPX tests (fpx is disabled via configure), PerlMagick
fails on wmf related tests if libwmf is not installed and on filter.t test
(not
On 2007/09/18 14:56, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:11:46AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > To save duplication of effort, it would be really useful if people
> > submitting new or updated ports would say which architecture/s they
> > have tested. Even if it's only i386.
> >
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:11:46AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> To save duplication of effort, it would be really useful if people
> submitting new or updated ports would say which architecture/s they
> have tested. Even if it's only i386.
>
You are right, diffs fixed, on i386 regression fails
On 2007/09/17 23:54, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> ImageMagick and p5-PerlMagick updated to latest version,
thank you.
> Comments ?
To save duplication of effort, it would be really useful if people
submitting new or updated ports would say which architecture/s they
have tested. Even if it's only i3
ImageMagick and p5-PerlMagick updated to latest version,
a lot of bug and new options added.
Comments ?
Cheers
Giovanni
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.97
diff -u -r1
10 matches
Mail list logo