On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:06:06AM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
Thanks a lot in advance. Also, be warned that the rakudo spectest will
take a very long time, maybe even days on such a machine.
armish is still building
Still. Swapping. Poor little machine.
Unless there are arm machines
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 02:35:42PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
I'll try, but building rakudo seems to need a lot of memory. This
may take some time on my poor little armish ;-)
Thanks a lot in advance. Also, be warned that the rakudo spectest will
take a very long time, maybe even days on
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:06:06AM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
This is similar to the results on amd64, except for
t/spec/S29-context/sleep.t, which passes on amd64.
[...]
Running it through ktrace(1) and then reading the trace with kdump
-R shows that `sleep' is implemented using poll(2),
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 12:27:15PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:06:06AM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
This is similar to the results on amd64, except for
t/spec/S29-context/sleep.t, which passes on amd64.
[...]
Running it through ktrace(1) and then reading the
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 02:58:51PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
FWIW, amd64 has the same strangeness, but here the timeout parameter
is smaller than on mips64el, so it passes the test case. ktrace/kdump
examples on amd64:
7989 perl60.04 CALL poll(0x202a42800,0x1,0x14ef)
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 01:22:50AM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
arm:
Test Summary Report
---
t/op/arithmetics.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 80 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 30
Files=381, Tests=13723, 9253 wallclock secs (132.27 usr 23.37 sys + 7265.69
cusr
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 08:16:51AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 01:21:51AM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:00:51PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 05:28:08PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
Oh, and you
diff has some
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 10:01:20AM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 01:22:50AM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
arm:
Test Summary Report
---
t/op/arithmetics.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 80 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 30
Files=381,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:53:28PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:49:43PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
+src/
+src/parrot/
+src/parrot/3.0.0/
+src/parrot/3.0.0/pmc/
+src/parrot/3.0.0/pmc/addrregistry.dump
Err.. no way, this is outside FHS. If the
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 09:27:52AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:53:28PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:49:43PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
+src/
+src/parrot/
+src/parrot/3.0.0/
+src/parrot/3.0.0/pmc/
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 02:14:10PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 09:27:52AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 11:53:28PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:49:43PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
snip
If you look, src/ is not in
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:42:17PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
diff -urN -x CVS parrot.orig/Makefile parrot/Makefile
--- parrot.orig/Makefile Wed Nov 17 09:05:18 2010
+++ parrot/Makefile Fri Mar 4 15:26:07 2011
[...]
+pre-build:
+ chown nobody ${WRKSRC}/docs
[...]
diff -urN -x
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 04:40:39PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:42:17PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
diff -urN -x CVS parrot.orig/Makefile parrot/Makefile
--- parrot.orig/MakefileWed Nov 17 09:05:18 2010
+++ parrot/Makefile Fri Mar 4 15:26:07 2011
[...]
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 05:28:08PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 04:40:39PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:42:17PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
diff -urN -x CVS parrot.orig/Makefile parrot/Makefile
--- parrot.orig/Makefile Wed Nov 17
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 04:40:39PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
ps: I'm trying to build it on arm and mips64el now.
Full regress logs at
http://openbsd.dead-parrot.de/parrot-arm-regress.log
http://openbsd.dead-parrot.de/parrot-mips64el-regress.log
arm:
Test Summary Report
---
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:15:44PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 04:40:39PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
ps: I'm trying to build it on arm and mips64el now.
Full regress logs at
http://openbsd.dead-parrot.de/parrot-arm-regress.log
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 01:21:51AM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:00:51PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 05:28:08PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
Oh, and you
diff has some /usr/local hardcoded which should use LOCALBASE+SUBST_CMD.
It's only in the
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 02:27:12PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
Perl 6 on OpenBSD needs some love, so I ported the most recent stable
version of the parrot, plus the Rakudo Perl6 compiler. The parrot passes
all currently implemented regression tests on amd64, and rakudo passes
all but five
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 09:40:43PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 02:27:12PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
Perl 6 on OpenBSD needs some love, so I ported the most recent stable
version of the parrot, plus the Rakudo Perl6 compiler. The parrot passes
all currently
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:49:43PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
+src/
+src/parrot/
+src/parrot/3.0.0/
+src/parrot/3.0.0/pmc/
+src/parrot/3.0.0/pmc/addrregistry.dump
Err.. no way, this is outside FHS. If the files are needed by parrot,
patch it so that it finds them in a
20 matches
Mail list logo
