Re: xstatbar memory leak

2016-02-09 Thread Gregor Best
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:43:32AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I just noticed xstatbar using "quite a lot" more memory than I was > expecting. Does anyone fancy trying to track down the leak? It doesn't > look like any flags are needed to trigger the leak, but using "-s 0" > to avoid sleeping

Re: xstatbar memory leak

2016-02-09 Thread Erling Westenvik
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:43:32AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I just noticed xstatbar using "quite a lot" more memory than I was > expecting. Does anyone fancy trying to track down the leak? It doesn't > look like any flags are needed to trigger the leak, but using "-s 0" > to avoid sleeping

Re: xstatbar memory leak

2016-02-09 Thread Ryan Flannery
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Gregor Best wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 02:43:32AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > I just noticed xstatbar using "quite a lot" more memory than I was > > expecting. Does anyone fancy trying to track down the leak? It doesn't > > look

xstatbar memory leak

2016-02-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
I just noticed xstatbar using "quite a lot" more memory than I was expecting. Does anyone fancy trying to track down the leak? It doesn't look like any flags are needed to trigger the leak, but using "-s 0" to avoid sleeping between updates makes it very easy to spot.