On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 08:02:01PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Both dependencies on non-library data are removed in snapshot 20101204.
Unfortunately DEF_COMMAND_MAXTIME is a string (time units), not an integer,
so we something along the lines of (untested, ...):
Index: src/global/pipe_command
Victor Duchovni:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 06:10:04PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Oh, this is a bug in the scache_clnt_create() routine. It is supposed
> > to use the "service" argument, instead of the global parameter. Victor
> > reported that one a few weeks ago.
>
> Indeed, the same repo
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 06:10:04PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Oh, this is a bug in the scache_clnt_create() routine. It is supposed
> to use the "service" argument, instead of the global parameter. Victor
> reported that one a few weeks ago.
Indeed, the same report also included the "maxtime"
Michael Tokarev:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > The patch below is something I carry locally
> > since very long time, I forgot when I used it
> > first. It were rejected when I first posted
> > it to postfix-users, but without it building
> > shared libpostfix is not possib
Michael Tokarev:
> 05.12.2010 19:46, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Michael Tokarev:
> >> The patch below is something I carry locally
> >> since very long time, I forgot when I used it
> >> first. It were rejected when I first posted
> >> it to postfix-users, but without it building
> >> shared libpost
05.12.2010 19:46, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Michael Tokarev:
>> The patch below is something I carry locally
>> since very long time, I forgot when I used it
>> first. It were rejected when I first posted
>> it to postfix-users, but without it building
>> shared libpostfix is not possible due to
>> w
Michael Tokarev:
> The patch below is something I carry locally
> since very long time, I forgot when I used it
> first. It were rejected when I first posted
> it to postfix-users, but without it building
> shared libpostfix is not possible due to
> wrongly placed variable. FWIW.
>
> /mjt
That
05.12.2010 19:12, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> The patch below is something I carry locally
> since very long time, I forgot when I used it
> first. It were rejected when I first posted
> it to postfix-users, but without it building
> shared libpostfix is not possible due to
> wrongly placed variable.
The patch below is something I carry locally
since very long time, I forgot when I used it
first. It were rejected when I first posted
it to postfix-users, but without it building
shared libpostfix is not possible due to
wrongly placed variable. FWIW.
/mjt
Well, I don't know where this should go
