Re: postfix without berkeleydb support

2012-01-17 Thread Eray Aslan
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:40:25AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > No problem. This is a three-line change in sys_defs.h and two lines > of documentation in makedefs. There probably needs to be some > documentation in DB_README.html as well. Thank you. I also needed this 2 line patch: --- a/src/g

Re: postfix without berkeleydb support

2012-01-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Eray Aslan: > I have requests from users to build postfix without BerkeleyDB support. > Usual complaint is that they are running in a resource constrained > environment, that tinycdb is enough, that BerkeleyDB is bloated, that > they are not using hash or btree lookups etc. This is on Linux by the

postfix without berkeleydb support

2012-01-17 Thread Eray Aslan
I have requests from users to build postfix without BerkeleyDB support. Usual complaint is that they are running in a resource constrained environment, that tinycdb is enough, that BerkeleyDB is bloated, that they are not using hash or btree lookups etc. This is on Linux by the way. Is this an ac

Re: Sending the local TCP port with Dovecot SASL

2012-01-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Phil Vandry: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 06:57:57AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Postfix allows a client to connect to the server through a proxy. > > Naively doing a getsockname() call on the SMTP server's file > > descriptor would produce an incorrect result (the port of the > > proxy-to-Postfix

Re: Sending the local TCP port with Dovecot SASL

2012-01-17 Thread Phil Vandry
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 06:57:57AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > Postfix allows a client to connect to the server through a proxy. > Naively doing a getsockname() call on the SMTP server's file > descriptor would produce an incorrect result (the port of the > proxy-to-Postfix connection). The corr

Re: Sending the local TCP port with Dovecot SASL

2012-01-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Phil Vandry: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:20:48AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > It isn't difficult to add the local TCP port number to the Dovecot > > > SASL request. May I suggest that this be added? > > > > You may suggest, but you may not know what you're asking for. Adding > > server (loc

Re: Sending the local TCP port with Dovecot SASL

2012-01-17 Thread Phil Vandry
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:20:48AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: > > It isn't difficult to add the local TCP port number to the Dovecot > > SASL request. May I suggest that this be added? > > You may suggest, but you may not know what you're asking for. Adding > server (local) port support to Postf