RE: SMTP transaction interrupted

Rocco Scappatura: 12:31:06.808714 O client.1395 server.25: . 1931191:1932551(1360) ack 358 win 65178 (DF) Can you show the TCP handshake (SYN/SYN+ACK/ACK) with TCP options. You are right, there is no TCP option. I will try to dump another SMTP session. This time directly on mail

temporary lookup problem

Hello all, Hope you all are well. I have found a problem with my 1+1/2 months old mail server here. Some times I get an error as below during sending email to an account as temporary lookup problem ~~~`` postfix/trivial-rewrite[13203]: fatal:

Re: temporary lookup problem

J. Bakshi wrote: Hello all, Hope you all are well. I have found a problem with my 1+1/2 months old mail server here. Some times I get an error as below during sending email to an account as temporary lookup problem ~~~`` postfix/trivial-rewrite[13203]: fatal:

RE: Use discard in a check_recipient_access

Why? If I want to avoid that the spammer wouldn't receive a response like this: but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 554 554 5.7.1

Re: Use discard in a check_recipient_access

On 11/4/2008, Lluis Ribes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: If I want to avoid that the spammer wouldn't receive a response like this: but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that

RE: Use discard in a check_recipient_access

OK! I'm going to configure REJECT, Thanks a lot Lluís -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Charles Marcus Enviado el: martes, 04 de noviembre de 2008 15:47 Para: postfix-users@postfix.org Asunto: Re: Use discard in a check_recipient_access On

RE: SMTP transaction interrupted

Which tcpdump version is this? Where are the time stamps and the packets with data (Len0)? tcpdump show only initial packet data by default and -s0 show all data. Is usefull when decode HEX (-xX) or ASCII (-A) I repeat, there is no need to look at the data itself. However, this

Message forwarding, sort of

I had been googling but with no avail since I have no clue how to query. I hope you can tell me with directive to use, I will do the rest of the homework :) what I want to make is some kind of rule that does the following: If an email message arrives from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Use discard in a check_recipient_access

Lluis Ribes wrote: Why? because: - mail loss is bad. The RFC recommends against it (search the RFC for frivoulously). ask those of us who keep criticizing hotmail for such behaviour. - with a reject at RCPT time, you don't lose your bandwidth and time reading the message (the connection

Re: Message forwarding, sort of

Francisco Neira wrote: I had been googling but with no avail since I have no clue how to query. I hope you can tell me with directive to use, I will do the rest of the homework :) what I want to make is some kind of rule that does the following: If an email message arrives from [EMAIL

SOLVED: SMTP transaction interrupted

I think I have solved the mystery. But I can offer you only a workaround, to turn off selective ACK support. Here is one event in a tcpdump file that I received a few hours ago (full context is below the signature): 10:49:57.930285 80.74.176.142.25 217.11.85.59.2528: . ack 1998901

Re: Message forwarding, sort of

Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: Francisco Neira wrote: I had been googling but with no avail since I have no clue how to query. I hope you can tell me with directive to use, I will do the rest of the homework :) what I want to make is some kind of rule that does the following: If an email

Re: SOLVED: SMTP transaction interrupted

Rocco Scappatura: I think I have solved the mystery. But I can offer you only a workaround, to turn off selective ACK support. Here is one event in a tcpdump file that I received a few hours ago (full context is below the signature): 10:49:57.930285 80.74.176.142.25

RE: SOLVED: SMTP transaction interrupted

I think I have solved the mystery. But I can offer you only a workaround, to turn off selective ACK support. Here is one event in a tcpdump file that I received a few hours ago (full context is below the signature): 10:49:57.930285 80.74.176.142.25 217.11.85.59.2528: .

[OFF] SPF

Hi, I am now using the policyd as shown below: main.cf # SPF spfpolicy_time_limit = 3600 smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ... check_policy_service unix: private / spfpolicy ... master.cf #SPF spfpolicy unix - nn - - spawn user = nobody argv = /usr/lib/postfix/policyd now the message

Re: [OFF] SPF

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Márcio Luciano Donada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am now using the policyd as shown below: main.cf # SPF spfpolicy_time_limit = 3600 smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ... check_policy_service unix: private / spfpolicy ... master.cf #SPF spfpolicy unix

Re: [OFF] SPF

On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:56:10 -0200 Márcio Luciano Donada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am now using the policyd as shown below: main.cf # SPF spfpolicy_time_limit = 3600 smtpd_recipient_restrictions = ... check_policy_service unix: private / spfpolicy ... master.cf #SPF spfpolicy unix - nn -

Re: How to implement a delay between emails sent by postfix

Wietse Venema wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I followed instructions from: http://prantran.blogspot.com/2007/01...untu-with.html to use postfix to send mails trough gmail.com using sendmail. My problem is when my bugzilla uses sendmail to send mails to specified addresses. From time to time

Re: SOLVED: SMTP transaction interrupted

Rocco Scappatura: I think I have solved the mystery. But I can offer you only a workaround, to turn off selective ACK support. Here is one event in a tcpdump file that I received a few hours ago (full context is below the signature): 10:49:57.930285 80.74.176.142.25

Re: DKIM-Signature not being added when sending from remote Outlook client

Bailo, John: I set up postfix with the dkim-milter. It works great when I am logged into the linux server and send mail with the mail command. However, if I try to connect to postfix from a remote computer, and send mail using a client such as outlook, the DKIM-Signature is not being

RE: DKIM-Signature not being added when sending from remote Outlook client

Do you think this is a better solution than trying to set the Internal Hosts parameter? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 10:42 AM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: DKIM-Signature not being added

Limit one forward do a specified user

Hi All! Currently, I use the forwards in /etc/aliases like this: # cat /etc/aliases forward1: user1 user2 forward2: user3 forward3: user1 user2 user3 I wanna know if I can limit the use of forward3, because I want to only the user9 send e-mail to forward3. All users can send e-mail to forward1

Use discard in a check_recipient_access

Hi, Could I use the “DISCARD” word in a check_recipient_access hash: rule? By example: %more /etc/postfix/access [EMAIL PROTECTED] permit_mynetworks,DISCARD or should I use use REJECT word. I don’t want to send error reply if someone sends mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from out of my

Re: Limit one forward do a specified user

M. Rodrigo Monteiro пишет: Hi All! Currently, I use the forwards in /etc/aliases like this: # cat /etc/aliases forward1: user1 user2 forward2: user3 forward3: user1 user2 user3 I wanna know if I can limit the use of forward3, because I want to only the user9 send e-mail to forward3. All users

OT: When Out Of Office Replies go bad

Thought most people here would get a kick out of this :) Evan http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/7702913.stm When officials asked for the Welsh translation of a road sign, they thought the reply was what they needed. Unfortunately, the e-mail response to Swansea council said in

Re: temporary lookup problem

mouss wrote: J. Bakshi wrote: Hello all, Hope you all are well. I have found a problem with my 1+1/2 months old mail server here. Some times I get an error as below during sending email to an account as temporary lookup problem ~~~`` postfix/trivial-rewrite[13203]: fatal:

Re: Use discard in a check_recipient_access

Lluis Ribes wrote: Hi, Could I use the “DISCARD” word in a check_recipient_access hash: rule? By example: %more /etc/postfix/access [EMAIL PROTECTED] permit_mynetworks,DISCARD or should I use use REJECT word. I don’t want to send error reply if someone sends mail to [EMAIL

Re: temporary lookup problem

J. Bakshi wrote: Hello mouss, hope you are well, thanks for your kind response. shall I use proxy in all the maps option. I like to be confirmed as it is a production server. The settings for virtual user and domains where you suggestion fits is # ##

Re: Re[7]: postfix 2.5 vmail hosting - Resource temporarily unavailable + mail transport unavailable - SOLVED

?li?s Tam?s: Udv / Greetings! I did not have sysctl compiled in the kernel. that one caused the problem. (the old .config become incmpatible with the new one and I havent chacked is all options are in place) I don't know what the affect of sysctl to postfix, but definately has. The effect

Re: SMTP transaction interrupted

Reinaldo de Carvalho: Which tcpdump version is this? Where are the time stamps and the packets with data (Len0)? tcpdump show only initial packet data by default and -s0 show all data. Is usefull when decode HEX (-xX) or ASCII (-A) I repeat, there is no need to look at the data itself.

Re: SMTP transaction interrupted

Rocco Scappatura: Rocco Scappatura: 12:31:06.808714 O client.1395 server.25: . 1931191:1932551(1360) ack 358 win 65178 (DF) Can you show the TCP handshake (SYN/SYN+ACK/ACK) with TCP options. You are right, there is no TCP option. I will try to dump another SMTP session.

Re: SOLVED: SMTP transaction interrupted

Rocco Scappatura: I think I have solved the mystery. But I can offer you only a workaround, to turn off selective ACK support. Here is one event in a tcpdump file that I received a few hours ago (full context is below the signature): 10:49:57.930285

Re: SOLVED: SMTP transaction interrupted

Wietse Venema: I don't know if this is a problem with Windows TCP/IP, or if this is a problem with a firewall on the client side. Reportedly, some firewalls randomize TCP sequence numbers but don't update the sequence numbers in SACK fields. That would be a sure way to mess up TCP. Quoting

Re: SOLVED: SMTP transaction interrupted

Wietse Venema wrote: Wietse Venema: I don't know if this is a problem with Windows TCP/IP, or if this is a problem with a firewall on the client side. Reportedly, some firewalls randomize TCP sequence numbers but don't update the sequence numbers in SACK fields. That would be a sure way

Re: Message forwarding, sort of

The above two are very good suggestions. In addition, thinking of doing this at client side. You may setup a mail matching and forwarding rules in .procmailrc at user's home to achieve this specific forwarding issues for each users. You can avoid to touch server side config each time when this

How to run patch file making correction

Hi folks, Debian Etch Postfix Cyrus I stuck on unable to send mails couple days. Telnet localhost 25 fails to work with following warning on; $ tail /var/log/mail.log Nov 5 03:49:17 xen03 postfix/postfix-script[1239]: refreshing the Postfix mail system Nov 5 03:49:17 xen03

Re: How to run patch file making correction

Stephen Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nov 5 03:49:45 xen03 postfix/smtpd[1245]: warning: unsupported SASL server implementation: cyrus Nov 5 03:49:45 xen03 postfix/smtpd[1245]: fatal: SASL per-process initialization failed # grep pwcheck /usr/local/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf #pwcheck_method:

Re: How to run patch file making correction

--- Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephen Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nov 5 03:49:45 xen03 postfix/smtpd[1245]: warning: unsupported SASL server implementation: cyrus Nov 5 03:49:45 xen03 postfix/smtpd[1245]: fatal: SASL per-process initialization failed # grep

Re: How to run patch file making correction

On Wednesday, November 05, 2008 at 06:25 CET, Stephen Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I have tried building Postfix Virtual by following other 3 howtos before, all packages download on Debian repo. After finish all servers can't work properly. This is my 4th round. I think I have

Re: How to run patch file making correction

* Stephen Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm following this howto; POSTFIX http://www.postfixvirtual.net/postfixvirtual.html#postfix CYRUS_SASL http://www.postfixvirtual.net/postfixvirtual.html#cyrussasl building the mail server. All packages were compiled from sources. Version;