Thanks Victor and Barney. I got this correctly configured tonight (the
loop issue was resolved); works perfectly now!
Ville
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 07:18:32AM +0100, Magnus B?ck wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 26, 2008 at 07:06 CET,
> Rajkumar S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How can I suspend postfix delivering mails to external domains
> > temporary? Postfix must accept mails to other destinations but
> > not
On Wednesday, November 26, 2008 at 07:06 CET,
Rajkumar S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I suspend postfix delivering mails to external domains
> temporary? Postfix must accept mails to other destinations but
> not deliver them till it's told to.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#d
Hi,
How can I suspend postfix delivering mails to external domains
temporary? Postfix must accept mails to other destinations but not
deliver them till it's told to.
raj
Bijayant Kumar
--- On Tue, 25/11/08, Barney Desmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Barney Desmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Reject Non-Ascii characters
> To: "postfix"
> Date: Tuesday, 25 November, 2008, 6:16 PM
> bijayant kumar wrote:
> > Thanks For the reply.
> > I did as sugge
hi!
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:18 AM, Rocco Scappatura
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:49 AM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa a écrit :
>> >
>> >>> However, Postfix supports access maps that can reject mail for
>> >>> over-quota users, if
--On Tuesday, November 25, 2008 7:32 PM -0500 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To test it, move the policy check above "permit_mynetworks", but make
sure that the script ignores domains you are not responsible for or
is triggered via a restriction class:
Great, thanks! I managed to
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 02:30:22PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:21 PM -0500 Victor Duchovni
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>What's the correct action to take if the account doesn't exist?
> >>Currently I have "defer_if_permit Service temporarily unava
--On Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:21 PM -0500 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's the correct action to take if the account doesn't exist?
Currently I have "defer_if_permit Service temporarily unavailable".
A hard "REJECT" seems more reasonable for invalid recipient addresses.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 02:14:10PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Friday, November 21, 2008 7:49 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >So, I'm guessing not breaking recipient validation means adding aliases,
> >which I can't do, or the above bit about the domai
--On Friday, November 21, 2008 7:49 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, I'm guessing not breaking recipient validation means adding aliases,
which I can't do, or the above bit about the domain and query, which I
also apparently can't do. I'll look into a policy service,
Sturgis, Grant:
> I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message headers of
> outbound email. I've done some reading about this and have found two
> solutions:
...
> 2. Use header_checks like this
> http://www.nabble.com/Hide-internal-address-(Postfix)-td2300995.html
Wietse Venema
Sturgis, Grant a écrit :
> On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 17:26 -0700, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Sturgis, Grant:
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message
>> headers of
>>> outbound email. I've done some reading about this and have found
>> two
>>> solutions:
>>> 2.
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 11:32 -0700, Sturgis, Grant wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 17:26 -0700, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Sturgis, Grant:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message
> > headers of
> > > outbound email. I've done some reading about this and
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 17:26 -0700, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Sturgis, Grant:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I'm trying to hide our internal mail servers from the message
> headers of
> > outbound email. I've done some reading about this and have found
> two
> > solutions:
> > 2. Use header_checks like this
>
ram:
> Our clients set up their mail forwarding to blackberry servers
> The blackberry server is doing a ratelimit and mails get held up on our
> servers
>
> I can easily configure multiple IP addresses on the machine. Can I
> configure postfix to send using different bind addresses
>
> I know
bijayant kumar wrote:
> Thanks For the reply.
> I did as suggested but postfix accepted this mail also and then rejects
> complaining
> Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table;
> from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proto=ESMTP helo=
>
> It should not accep
ram wrote:
> Our clients set up their mail forwarding to blackberry servers
> The blackberry server is doing a ratelimit and mails get held up on our
> servers
>
> I can easily configure multiple IP addresses on the machine. Can I
> configure postfix to send using different bind addresses
>
>
Bijayant Kumar
--- On Tue, 25/11/08, Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Reject Non-Ascii characters
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: Tuesday, 25 November, 2008, 5:45 PM
> On Tuesday 25 November 2008 12:26:17 bijayant kumar w
Ville Walveranta wrote:
> Does the domain name that comes after
> "smtp:" need to be the external filtering service's MX directly, or a
> domain name whose MX records point to the external filtering service's
> MX?
It can be either, as documented here under "Result Format".
http://www.postfix.org/
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 12:26:17 bijayant kumar wrote:
> Some days ago at my original amavis server logs I observed some strange
> lines like (16188-21) WARN: address modified (recip):
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> <"\240singh.richa09"@gmail.com>
>
> (16188-21) (!) lookup_sql: sql exec: err=7, 22021
Our clients set up their mail forwarding to blackberry servers
The blackberry server is doing a ratelimit and mails get held up on our
servers
I can easily configure multiple IP addresses on the machine. Can I
configure postfix to send using different bind addresses
I know I can change the smt
Thanks For the reply.
I did as suggested but postfix accepted this mail also and then rejects
complaining
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table;
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proto=ESMTP helo=
It should not accepts the mail right?
Some days ago at
Ville Walveranta a écrit :
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:35 AM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As Henrik says, you can break them with /x.
>
> Got it to work after realizing a blank space is needed in front of the
> continuation lines...
>
>> Note that in this example, pcre is too much. a hash
bijayant kumar a écrit :
> Hello to list,
>
> I am using postfix-2.5.5 on gentoo box in a virtual domain environment. Some
> of my users just copy paste the email addresses which contains some non-ascii
> characters in their recipients list which results in delaying mails for other
> users beca
Res a écrit :
> Is it possible to set the default reject message for this type? So in
> access file "1.2.3.4reject" only needs 'reject' rather than
> re-entering the custom message for every entry.
>
[method 1]
use a script.
sed -e s'/%REJECT_NO_5%/reject blah blah/' \
/etc/postf
Hello to list,
I am using postfix-2.5.5 on gentoo box in a virtual domain environment. Some of
my users just copy paste the email addresses which contains some non-ascii
characters in their recipients list which results in delaying mails for other
users because it gets stuck in amavis. I am try
Thanks Victor.. I'll give that a try. With my first attempt I managed
to create a loop of some kind, but after re-reading your description I
think I know what caused it. One thing I wanted to clarify is the
transport map definition. Does the domain name that comes after
"smtp:" need to be the exter
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:35 AM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Henrik says, you can break them with /x.
Got it to work after realizing a blank space is needed in front of the
continuation lines...
> Note that in this example, pcre is too much. a hash (or cdb) will do fine:
>
> virtualdoma
Hmm..
I think I was mistakingly replying to Michael as the original poster,
but he was not. So, if OP does not live in The Netherlands, plz
disregard my previous post ;]
On Nov 25, 2008, at 11:20 AM, Samy Ascha, Xel Media B.V. wrote:
Hey,
Have you actually tried telnetting from other loc
Hey,
Have you actually tried telnetting from other locations? I see you
live in The netherlands, where it is common for ISPs to block this
port to all destinations, other than their own SMTP servers.
I think this is kind of fascist, but it does, somewhat, limit zombies
from sending spam t
Ville Walveranta пишет:
> Is it possible to limit header_checks either by recipient domain or by
> listening interface? I'd like to remove certain headers, but only from
> specific domains.
>
> Ville
something like this:
main.cf:
...
header_checks = regexp:$config_directory/header_checks
...
smtpd
32 matches
Mail list logo
