Hello,
i have a problem with my postfix. It doesn't send HELO when the
hostname is set to a real FQDN name (A and PTR records are done). If i
change the hostname or smtp_helo_name to something that is not my
original FQDN, then it sends the HELO.
Thanks in advance
Antanas Kneita:
Hello,
i have a problem with my postfix. It doesn't send HELO when the
hostname is set to a real FQDN name (A and PTR records are done). If i
change the hostname or smtp_helo_name to something that is not my
original FQDN, then it sends the HELO.
Please report the ERROR
I'm using SMTP content filter in my postfix smtp server, I'm receiving raw
message on my
SMTP filter like:
Mail From, RCPT TO, DATA
Now I need to convert this message into javamail multipart message.
Is there any good way to convert into it.
Thanks,
Sumit Arora
I have someone telling me that they can't send email to my mail
server. I checked the logs and it appears that Postfix is not happy
with the way their client or server is sending the message to me. I
want to understand what is causing this. I would like to know if
anyone can please help me
Hi Carlos,
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 09:08 -0400, Carlos Williams wrote:
I have someone telling me that they can't send email to my mail
server. I checked the logs and it appears that Postfix is not happy
with the way their client or server is sending the message to me. I
want to understand what
Hi listers
On one hand this site uses SASL2 authentication to access the postfix
SMTPD, i.e. for sending messages.
On the other hand this site uses LDAP for all pam and mail parameters.
i wanted to combine both. i.e. take the SASL2 passwords from LDAP,
because maintaining the SASL DB file
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Martijn de Munnik mart...@youngguns.nl wrote:
I think this is not too restrictive and the sending mailserver should
fix their rdns, YMMV. We use a policy server (policyd-weight) which
gives scores for things like no rdns, dailup ip, ip in dnsbl etc.
So the
Antanas Kneita:
The thing is that there is no error message and the email is delivered
to the servers that do not require HELO. If the server requires HELO
the error is:
550 Forged host name (in reply to RCPT TO command))
Please show evidence that Postfix sends no HELO or EHLO command.
For
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 15:48 +0200, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 09:41 -0400, Carlos Williams wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Martijn de Munnik mart...@youngguns.nl
wrote:
I think this is not too restrictive and the sending mailserver should
fix their rdns,
On 9/24/2009 9:08 AM, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 15:48 +0200, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 09:41 -0400, Carlos Williams wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Martijn de Munnikmart...@youngguns.nl wrote:
I think this is not too restrictive and the
I have a Postfix server running with also Postgrey enabled. It seems
to work great however in the last week I have noticed a huge increase
in spam mail that is sent to postmas...@... I am configured on the
mail server to get all mail destined for Postmaster and it appears
that everyone and their
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
Some older versions of postfix give special treatment to the postmaster
address. To disable this special treatment, add
# main.cf
address_verify_sender = $double_bounce_sender
I am guessing that 2.3 which the latest
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 09:59:21AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
to the servers that do not require HELO. If the server requires HELO
the error is:
550 Forged host name (in reply to RCPT TO command))
Please show evidence that Postfix sends no HELO or EHLO command.
The question is of
Hello all,
Is this a problem with uribl.com's MX setup in DNS, or a problem on my
end? Or both? My DNS provider enables wildcard DNS for my domain. I'm
not sure if that is part of this problem, but seems possible. If so,
what can I do, short of switching DNS providers, to prevent this hard
fursink:
I have just upgraded from postfix 2.3.3 (CentOS 5.3 stock package) to
2.6.5-1. The process went quite smoothly and everything seems good,
except I just noticed a log entry pertaining to failed delivery for a
virtual user. I am not familiar enough with milters to know if this
Please review the Postfix 2.6 RELEASE_NOTES file, in particular
the section titled Major changes - milter support.
milter_protocol = 2 in main.cf. did the trick... Thank you.
On 24-Sep-2009, at 08:57, wiskbr...@hotmail.com
wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Can I have two or more virtual aliases maps?
Sure. Here are mine
virtual_alias_maps =
hash:$config_directory/virtual
pcre:$config_directory/virtual.pcre,
pcre:$config_directory/virtual_sql.pcre,
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:50:19 -0400
fursink furs...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just upgraded from postfix 2.3.3 (CentOS 5.3 stock package) to
2.6.5-1. The process went quite smoothly and everything seems good,
except I just noticed a log entry pertaining to failed delivery for a
virtual user. I
On 24-Sep-2009, at 15:34, Erick Calder wrote:
On Sep 24, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 01:40:58PM -0700, Erick Calder wrote:
I've been asking at the google groups mailing list with no results
so I
figure I'd try this list:
how can I customise the notice
On Sep 24, 2009, at 4:01 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 24-Sep-2009, at 15:34, Erick Calder wrote:
On Sep 24, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 01:40:58PM -0700, Erick Calder wrote:
I've been asking at the google groups mailing list with no
results so I
figure I'd
Erick Calder:
On Sep 24, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 01:40:58PM -0700, Erick Calder wrote:
I've been asking at the google groups mailing list with no results
so I
figure I'd try this list:
how can I customise the notice sent to a user when
Victor Duchovni wrote:
Postfix is not Psychic.
Have you tried postfix --psychic?
On Sep 24, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
If Postfix announces a size limit of X, many SMTP clients won't
attempt to send larger messages, and Postfix won't accept a larger
message (and thus Postfix will not generate a bounce email message).
If you must configure Postfix to accept
Erick Calder:
On Sep 24, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
If Postfix announces a size limit of X, many SMTP clients won't
attempt to send larger messages, and Postfix won't accept a larger
message (and thus Postfix will not generate a bounce email message).
If you must configure
24 matches
Mail list logo
