devel anaconda put forth on 11/6/2009 12:18 AM:
> This is an 1U PowerEdge server with 4 slots for SCSI disks
Ouch, 4 disks is very limiting. Given that the spool files are
temporary in nature, your best option short of purchasing a new server
or an external SCSI array enclosure, is to add two mo
Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre wrote:
Hi,
I think outgoing scans are a little different. You have some
advantages and disadvantages respect incoming mail scanning.
Advantages are that you know you're users and more or less what they
do or you have it controlled with some scripts. So you can
i
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 10:16:35AM +0300, devel anaconda wrote:
> Actually, I didn't tell the complete story.
> The point is:
>
> MTA (postfix) recieves the message. Then I need to put this message
> to 3 scripts (I must notify three different services about incoming
> mail). Now it looks like th
ram wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 11:47 +0200, Alex wrote:
Hello
This is my first post on this list. I have a atypical configuration like :
- an MX server for inbound mails; this server is configured virtual
domains, graylisting , antivirus and antispam for all incoming mails; it
06.11.09, 01:58, "Victor Duchovni" :
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:02:45AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > If it's a 1U server, I can tell you already that you are screwed, and
> > that you need a bigger chassis with more SCSI/SAS disk bays, at least 8
> > disks given your load of 250-300 msgs/sec.
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:02:45AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> If it's a 1U server, I can tell you already that you are screwed, and
> that you need a bigger chassis with more SCSI/SAS disk bays, at least 8
> disks given your load of 250-300 msgs/sec.
Does this application really need Postfix a
06.11.09, 00:02, "Stan Hoeppner" :
> devel anaconda put forth on 11/5/2009 5:19 PM:
> > Hello everybody!
> >
> > I have a high-performance server (dual quad-core Xeon 2.8Ghz + 16GB RAM +
> > 2SCSI disks 140Gb), RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.4, software RAID1 + Postfix
> > 2.5.9.
> > This server ser
05.11.09, 17:58, "Kenneth Marshall" :
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 02:19:34AM +0300, devel anaconda wrote:
> > Hello everybody!
> >
> > I have a high-performance server (dual quad-core Xeon 2.8Ghz + 16GB RAM +
> > 2SCSI disks 140Gb), RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.4, software RAID1 + Postfix
> > 2.5.9.
devel anaconda put forth on 11/5/2009 5:19 PM:
> Hello everybody!
>
> I have a high-performance server (dual quad-core Xeon 2.8Ghz + 16GB RAM +
> 2SCSI disks 140Gb), RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.4, software RAID1 + Postfix
> 2.5.9.
> This server serves only smtp traffic. The only thing postfix shou
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:11:30PM -0500, Eric B. wrote:
> > Not necessarily. They may have already opened all the files they need and
> > loaded all the libraries they need before they chroot. Postfix processes
> > chroot themselves, after they initialize and just before they drop privs,
> > they
"Victor Duchovni" wrote in message
news:20091106004615.gn27...@np305c2n2.ms.com...
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 06:36:28PM -0500, Eric B. wrote:
>
>> smtp 7886 postfix rtd DIR 253,0 4096
>> 1762695 /var/spool/postfix
>
> The smtp(8) delivery agent is chrooted.
>
>> So
Hi Mouss:
Thanks for your help. I have checked my main.cf, there are some small problem
in it. So postfix does support this, just I make wrong setting. Thank you!
Best regrads!
Coofucoo
-邮件原件-
发件人: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
代表 mouss
发送时间: 2
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 06:36:28PM -0500, Eric B. wrote:
> smtp 7886 postfix rtd DIR 253,0 4096
> 1762695 /var/spool/postfix
The smtp(8) delivery agent is chrooted.
> So if these deamons are actually running chroot, wouldn't they need the lib
> dirs?
Not necessa
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 02:19:34AM +0300, devel anaconda wrote:
> user:|/usr/local/bin/script
>
> The flow is about 250-300 mails per second.
Stop right there. At 200 msgs/sec, fork/exec of scripts via local(8)
is never going to give you the right performance. You need (in addition
to the fa
devel anaconda:
> Hello everybody!
>
> I have a high-performance server (dual quad-core Xeon 2.8Ghz + 16GB RAM +
> 2SCSI disks 140Gb), RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.4, software RAID1 + Postfix
> 2.5.9.
> This server serves only smtp traffic. The only thing postfix should do -
> receive mails for on
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 04:03:13PM -0800, Corey Chandler wrote:
> Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>>
>> Your system is not a high-performance server I/O-wise. Your two disks can
>> only
>> handle 200-300 fsync's to disk per second and postfix will always sync
>> your
>> mail to disk before passing it on
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
Your system is not a high-performance server I/O-wise. Your two disks can only
handle 200-300 fsync's to disk per second and postfix will always sync your
mail to disk before passing it on for local processing. You will need a
battery backed caching RAID controller or fas
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 02:19:34AM +0300, devel anaconda wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> I have a high-performance server (dual quad-core Xeon 2.8Ghz + 16GB RAM +
> 2SCSI disks 140Gb), RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.4, software RAID1 + Postfix
> 2.5.9.
> This server serves only smtp traffic. The only t
"Victor Duchovni" wrote in message
news:20091105225922.gi27...@np305c2n2.ms.com...
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 05:34:46PM -0500, Eric B. wrote:
>
>> pickup5509 postfix rtd DIR 253,0 4096
>> 1762695 /var/spool/postfix
>> qmgr 5510 postfix rtd DIR
Hello everybody!
I have a high-performance server (dual quad-core Xeon 2.8Ghz + 16GB RAM + 2SCSI
disks 140Gb), RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.4, software RAID1 + Postfix 2.5.9.
This server serves only smtp traffic. The only thing postfix should do -
receive mails for one user and send it to local scr
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 05:34:46PM -0500, Eric B. wrote:
> pickup5509 postfix rtd DIR 253,0 4096
> 1762695 /var/spool/postfix
> qmgr 5510 postfix rtd DIR 253,0 4096
> 1762695 /var/spool/postfix
>
> So it seems as though Postfix is not
"Wietse Venema" wrote in message
news:20091105214748.ad1b71f3...@spike.porcupine.org...
> Daniel L'Hommedieu:
>> > I definitley have chroot set to Y in my master.cf file, and have
>> > done a
>> > postfix restart. I do get a warning on restart that
>
> Run LSOF and see what it says for the proce
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 05:12:28PM -0500, Eric B. wrote:
> > Much easier to just use a transport(5) table entry. If one is willing
> > to implement static overrides (rather than redirect DNS queries to an
> > alternate source), the transport(5) table is by far the simplest choice.
>
> I did get t
"Victor Duchovni" wrote in message
news:20091105214246.gd27...@np305c2n2.ms.com...
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 04:27:33PM -0500, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
>
>> Your postfix
>> server will use DNS to query for the MX record for example.com, which
>> will
>> return mx.example.com. Ordinarily it would
"Daniel L'Hommedieu" wrote in message
news:9a3f9786-0cb4-41a7-8462-4c49445a4...@gmail.com...
> On Nov 5, 2009, at 16:12, Eric B. wrote:
>> "Daniel L'Hommedieu" wrote in message
>> news:670a051c-1871-4e2e-82d8-187324ef1...@gmail.com...
>>> On Nov 5, 2009, at 15:52, Eric B. wrote:
"Eric B."
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 04:40:49PM -0500, Eric B. wrote:
> "Victor Duchovni" wrote in message
> news:20091105212519.gz27...@np305c2n2.ms.com...
> > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 03:52:00PM -0500, Eric B. wrote:
> >
> >> I definitley have chroot set to Y in my master.cf file, and have done a
> >> postf
Daniel L'Hommedieu:
> > I definitley have chroot set to Y in my master.cf file, and have
> > done a
> > postfix restart. I do get a warning on restart that
Run LSOF and see what it says for the process root directory
(indicated with the rtd field).
Wietse
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 21:32:50 +0100
Patrick Ben Koetter replied:
>cmusaslsecretCRAM is a default field SASL queries for. It will be
>dropped in an upcoming release of Cyrus SASL. For the moment, add the
>column and ingore it or just ignore it.
Just to see what would happen, I added to column. I wa
"Victor Duchovni" wrote in message
news:20091105212519.gz27...@np305c2n2.ms.com...
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 03:52:00PM -0500, Eric B. wrote:
>
>> I definitley have chroot set to Y in my master.cf file, and have done a
>> postfix restart. I do get a warning on restart that
>
> What row in the ta
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 04:27:33PM -0500, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
> Your postfix
> server will use DNS to query for the MX record for example.com, which will
> return mx.example.com. Ordinarily it would then query DNS for the "A"
> record for mx.example.com, but if you configure nsswitch.com
waltari2001 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a webapp that hands email messages to the local Postfix. One of the
> requirement is that I need to hold all (client specific) messages for a day
> before delivery.
>
> I created the following rule in header_checks:
>
> /^Subject:.*KEYWORD/ HOLD
>
> I have a
On Nov 5, 2009, at 16:12, Eric B. wrote:
"Daniel L'Hommedieu" wrote in message
news:670a051c-1871-4e2e-82d8-187324ef1...@gmail.com...
On Nov 5, 2009, at 15:52, Eric B. wrote:
"Eric B." wrote in message
news:hcupsk$b8...@ger.gmane.org...
"Victor Duchovni" wrote in
message
news:20091104232
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 03:52:00PM -0500, Eric B. wrote:
> I definitley have chroot set to Y in my master.cf file, and have done a
> postfix restart. I do get a warning on restart that
What row in the table has the chroot set to "y"?
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-li
Hi,
I have a webapp that hands email messages to the local Postfix. One of the
requirement is that I need to hold all (client specific) messages for a day
before delivery.
I created the following rule in header_checks:
/^Subject:.*KEYWORD/ HOLD
I have a script that runs every 5 mins that
"Daniel L'Hommedieu" wrote in message
news:670a051c-1871-4e2e-82d8-187324ef1...@gmail.com...
> On Nov 5, 2009, at 15:52, Eric B. wrote:
>> "Eric B." wrote in message
>> news:hcupsk$b8...@ger.gmane.org...
>>> "Victor Duchovni" wrote in message
>>> news:20091104232940.gi27...@np305c2n2.ms.com...
Hi,
I think outgoing scans are a little different. You have some
advantages and disadvantages respect incoming mail scanning.
Advantages are that you know you're users and more or less what they
do or you have it controlled with some scripts. So you can
identify easier when a user is
On Nov 5, 2009, at 15:52, Eric B. wrote:
"Eric B." wrote in message
news:hcupsk$b8...@ger.gmane.org...
"Victor Duchovni" wrote in
message
news:20091104232940.gi27...@np305c2n2.ms.com...
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 06:16:56PM -0500, Eric B. wrote:
Is there no way to direct Postfix to a differen
"Eric B." wrote in message
news:hcupsk$b8...@ger.gmane.org...
> "Victor Duchovni" wrote in message
> news:20091104232940.gi27...@np305c2n2.ms.com...
>> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 06:16:56PM -0500, Eric B. wrote:
>>
>>> Is there no way to direct Postfix to a different DNS server (as opposed
>>> to
>>
coofucoo zhang a écrit :
>
>
> I want to set up a postfix mail server which have many IP. Each of the
>
> ip will work for one of my customer. So that is means my customer will
>
> think that he has a dedicate mail server. But in fact all the mail
>
> server are running on one real machine. I
Roderick A. Anderson a écrit :
> Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
>> Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
>>> My understanding, from following several threads here and some
>>> research, is the return-path is transmitted out-of-band in the SMTP
>>> MAIL request and placed in the message by the LDA.
>>>
>>> How w
* Jerry :
> I have just started using SQL with SASL2. Previously, I was using the
> sasldb file.
>
> Although everything appears to be working correctly, I am finding this
> error message in the /var/log/messages log file.
>
> Nov 5 14:55:01 scorpio postfix/smtpd[9719]: sql query failed: Unknown
I have just started using SQL with SASL2. Previously, I was using the
sasldb file.
Although everything appears to be working correctly, I am finding this
error message in the /var/log/messages log file.
Nov 5 14:55:01 scorpio postfix/smtpd[9719]: sql query failed: Unknown column
'cmusaslsecretC
On Nov 5, 2009, at 3:02 PM, "Roderick A. Anderson" > wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
My understanding, from following several threads here and some
research, is the return-path is transmitted out-of-band in the
SMTP MAIL request and placed in the message by th
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
My understanding, from following several threads here and some
research, is the return-path is transmitted out-of-band in the SMTP
MAIL request and placed in the message by the LDA.
How would a proxy determine the value(s) that will be u
Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
My understanding, from following several threads here and some research,
is the return-path is transmitted out-of-band in the SMTP MAIL request
and placed in the message by the LDA.
How would a proxy determine the value(s) that will be used to create the
Return-Pat
45 matches
Mail list logo
