Hi Stan,
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:24:53 -0600
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Mikael Bak put forth on 12/9/2009 4:18 AM:
I understand why you avoid the real question. But hey - it's your server :-)
Do you? I have avoided it because these threads can quickly delve into
After updating postfix postgresql (still 8.3 though), postmap lookups to
postgres aren't working anymore. I HAVE recompiled postfix rpm to include the
postgresql libraries.
# rpm -q postfix postgresql-server
postfix-2.6.5-2.fc11.i586 (This is actually from a fedora12 SRPM)
Hi,
I have already set up DOVECOT + POSTFIX mail server and I can send and receive
mails outside my Domain. The problem however is that LOCAL Mail is not working.
When I send LOCAL mails, it leaves my system without error messages but it is
not received by the recipient. Same thing happens when
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:42:13AM -0800, Brian Neu wrote:
After updating postfix postgresql (still 8.3 though), postmap lookups
to postgres aren't working anymore. I HAVE recompiled postfix rpm to
include the postgresql libraries.
snip
I get:
]# postmap -q testus...@advancedopen.com
Devdas, that worked! Sorta.
At least now it reveals another message:
postmap: warning: connect to pgsql server localhost: FATAL: Ident
authentication failed for user dbmail?
but I can psql into the db just fine with those settings.
Got it.
had to s/localhost/127.0.0.1/ for everything. I
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 06:33:42AM -0800, Brian Neu wrote:
Devdas, that worked! Sorta.
At least now it reveals another message:
postmap: warning: connect to pgsql server localhost: FATAL: Ident
authentication failed for user dbmail?
I bet Postfix is not running as user dbmail and you
Hi all,
I would like to forward all mail as they come(with the same envelope
recipient addr.)
- it is not problem to do it with transport_map, for example:
domain.tldsmtp:remoteserver
BUT i would like to keep a local copy too.(for all addresses)
I mean, i have 2 almost identical postfix
Wietse Venema wrote:
The postscreen manpage lists the tests in the order of execution.
Thus, the blacklist is done tested first. If the client is not
blacklisted, then the whitelist test is done. And so on.
I could swap the order of black/white tests if there is agreement that
the current
On 9-Dec-2009, at 22:23, Eero Volotinen wrote:
3) We currently have all our members configured as virtual users with
all their email stored as maildir stores under /var/mail/example.com. We
are considering giving each member a personal space, probably under
/home (there would be no local login
Hello I'm having weird problems with unknown mail transport error.
I moved a working postfix server from a linux machine to a netbsd one
and at first I thought everything was working. I am receiving emails
to all my mails that are hosted on this server, however I can't send
mail from my
On 12/10/2009 11:57 AM, c...@mail.bg wrote:
Hello I'm having weird problems with unknown mail transport error.
I moved a working postfix server from a linux machine to a netbsd one
and at first I thought everything was working. I am receiving emails
to all my mails that are hosted on this
Цитат от Brian Evans - Postfix List grkni...@scent-team.com:
On 12/10/2009 11:57 AM, c...@mail.bg wrote:
Hello I'm having weird problems with unknown mail transport error.
I moved a working postfix server from a linux machine to a netbsd one
and at first I thought everything was
Hi,
after updating Postfix from 2.4.7.5 to 2.6.5.2 I see some changed
behaviour in the smtp process delivering to our content_filter. The
content filter does not recive the part after the recipient_delimiter as
RCPT TO anymore. Caused by this we loose this information for any mail
going through
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:14:26PM +0100, Simon Klempert wrote:
after updating Postfix from 2.4.7.5 to 2.6.5.2 I see some changed
You also changed main.cf, or the package update did it for you.
behaviour in the smtp process delivering to our content_filter. The
content filter does not recive
Mark Martinec:
Wietse Venema wrote:
The postscreen manpage lists the tests in the order of execution.
Thus, the blacklist is done tested first. If the client is not
blacklisted, then the whitelist test is done. And so on.
I could swap the order of black/white tests if there is
As of snapshot 20091209, postscreen searches the whitelist first.
great, thanks
Len
Thanks for looking into this, I've attached postconf -n output below. If
you need some LDAP queries performed, please let me know. See some answers
below as well.
On Thu, December 10, 2009 19:37, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:14:26PM +0100, Simon Klempert wrote:
after
On 11/30/2009 10:48 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:35:02AM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote:
It seems like understanding where the delay=86457
and delays=86457/0/0.36/0.18 come from would probably help me to
understand the 24 delay.
Not really. The message took 1 day to
Emmett Culley:
snip email header
Received: from den1.thisserver.net (den1.thisserver.net [198.202.202.21])
by g1.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3586C400032
for webmas...@example.com; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:15:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by den1.thisserver.net (Postfix,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:12:36AM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote:
It seems like understanding where the delay=86457
and delays=86457/0/0.36/0.18 come from would probably help me to
understand the 24 delay.
Not really. The message took 1 day to enter the active queue, not
surprising,
Is there a way to rate limit what a user can send?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist
rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630
Merry Christmas
* The Doctor doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca:
Is there a way to rate limit what a user can send?
The policyd policy server http://www.policyd.org can do that.
--
All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on the
list and archived for public access unless privacy is
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 08:03:01PM +0100, Simon Klempert wrote:
Dec 10 18:37:07 zimbra postfix/smtp[542]: 81058E3232:
to=bou...@aruba.com, orig_to=bounce+0.6...@.com,
relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=14, delays=8.8/0/0.01/4.8,
dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok,
http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html
I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix
to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't
seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 error
if spamc/spamd
Thomas Bolioli wrote:
http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html
I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix
to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't
seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550
http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html
I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring
postfix to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is
complete. I can't seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs
to get a 550 error if spamc/spamd
http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html
I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix
to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't
seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 error
if spamc/spamd
http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html
I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix
to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't
seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 error
if spamc/spamd
On 12/10/2009 8:09 PM, Marty Anstey wrote:
Rejecting messages inline is a far better solution than generating a
bounce or simply dropping the message. Most, if not all spam has a
forged sender so generating a bounce is a very bad idea. Rejecting
inline is much better than dropping message; at
Hi folks,
We are having an email server here running postfix/dovecot using mysql
as a backend (virtual user of course). The problem, or the question
we have is, how I can change the @something by default.
For example, if a batch job running on the server using userid "daemon"
send an
Mr Rob0,
I really take exception to your insulting language.
This is a Mailing list where people who do not know can learn a few things from
others who know.
It is NOT a place to insult and demean people.
Meanwhile helping is optional, if you do not wish to help, you could easily
ignore the
31 matches
Mail list logo
