On Wed, April 14, 2010 5:01 am, Stan Hoeppner said:
> Gary Smith put forth on 4/13/2010 7:07 PM:
[...]
> > I know some time ago someone had mentioned for the hash lookup table
> > to work correctly it needed a key pair so I would think:
> >
> > j...@domain.tld j...@domain.tld
> >
> > Which is th
I want to thank you and Viktor for replying.
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 07:18:38PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> John Schmitt:
[...]
> > Transcript of session follows.
> >
> > Out: 220 mymachine.mydomain.net ESMTP Postfix
> > In: HELO mymachine
> > Out: 250 mymachine.mydomain.net
> > In: MAIL
Gary Smith put forth on 4/13/2010 7:07 PM:
> Currently we are using mysql plugin for this and are switching over to static
> files (or files generated on a schedule from the database). Anyway, looking
> at the docs, it says that the entry need only been found in the file to be
> accepted, other
> The script just does:
>
> * Copy in new relay_recipients file
> * postmap relay_recipients
> * postfix reload
>
> Is there a better way to do this? Should I stop postfix completely during
> this time? Will putting the queue on hold avoid this problem, or do I need
> to stop Postfix completely
Currently we are using mysql plugin for this and are switching over to static
files (or files generated on a schedule from the database). Anyway, looking at
the docs, it says that the entry need only been found in the file to be
accepted, otherwise it will be rejected.
"Postfix needs to know
mouss wrote:
> do never say "this does that and that does this". show what things do
> instead. With all due respect, we don't trust you judgement. Unjustified
> claims are useless. so please try to convince us. tell us what happens.
> don't tell us what you think.
I'm sorry. I got the welcome mai
fakessh a écrit :
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:38:28 -0300, Egberto Monteiro
> wrote:
>> Apr 13 23:31:35 r13151 postfix/trivial-rewrite[5504]: warning: do not
> list
>> domain fakessh.eu in *BOTH *mydestination and virtual_alias_domains
>>
>>
>>
>
> this error I do not know how to correct
> my mail s
Voytek Eymont a écrit :
> I seem to be having problems delivering emails to yahoo, how can I
> troubleshoot this ?
>
> mailq:
> ...
> 777DAB446E8 7709303 Fri Apr 9 12:15:32 a...@googlemail.com
> (lost connection with e.mx.mail.yahoo.com[67.195.168.230] while sending
> end of data -- message may
Voytek Eymont a écrit :
> I just see a number of these entries:
>
> Apr 13 20:45:37 postfix/smtp[31121]: D1F8DB4491F: to=,
> relay=mail4.barnet.com.au[202.83.178.125]:25, delay=54911,
> delays=54902/0.04/5.4/3.9, dsn=4.1.7, status=deferred (host
> mail4.barnet.com.au[202.83.178.125] said: 450 4.1.
Bob Eastbrook a écrit :
> I use wildcard MX records for mail, and a wildcard CNAME for web
> traffic. For example:
>
> *.example.com = MX record for mail.example.com
> *.example.com = CNAME myapp.appspot.com
>
so you say that *.example.com is an alias (CNAME record), yet you want
to g
t...@nerd.fi a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> I'm building an fresh multidomain environment with Debian Lenny. I've
> installed and configured postfix, spamc and cyrus-imapd and things are
> running almost smoothly.
>
> I can send email everywhere just fine via SMTPS, including my own host.
> Since I'm on
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On
Behalf Of fakessh [fake...@fakessh.eu]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 April 2010 7:43 AM
To: Egberto Monteiro
Cc: Postfix users
Subject: Re: catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:38:28 -0300, Egberto M
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:38:28 -0300, Egberto Monteiro
wrote:
> Apr 13 23:31:35 r13151 postfix/trivial-rewrite[5504]: warning: do not
list
> domain fakessh.eu in *BOTH *mydestination and virtual_alias_domains
>
>
>
this error I do not know how to correct
my mail server work correctly with that e
Apr 13 23:31:35 r13151 postfix/trivial-rewrite[5504]: warning: do not list
domain fakessh.eu in *BOTH *mydestination and virtual_alias_domains
fakessh wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:02:01 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
On 4/13/2010 3:34 PM, fakessh wrote:
hello all
hello list
hello much ma
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:02:01 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
> On 4/13/2010 3:34 PM, fakessh wrote:
>> hello all
>> hello list
>> hello much many people
>> hello wieste
>>
>> the catch-all does not seem to work.
>
> Doesn't work in what way? Show logs of what happens vs. what
> you expect to happen.
On 4/13/2010 3:34 PM, fakessh wrote:
hello all
hello list
hello much many people
hello wieste
the catch-all does not seem to work.
Doesn't work in what way? Show logs of what happens vs. what
you expect to happen.
I, however, a proper definition of it in /etc/postfix/virtual
Please show
hello all
hello list
hello much many people
hello wieste
the catch-all does not seem to work.
I, however, a proper definition of it in /etc/postfix/virtual
postconf -n
[r...@r13151 ~]# postconf -n
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
body_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/body_checks.cf
bounce_notice_recip
Victor Duchovni:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 02:23:06PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Stephen Carville:
> > > FWIW, it looks like the copies of non-delivery notifications go to
> > > bounce_notice_recipient but the messages with the SMTP transactions
> > > go to error_notice_recipient. By sett
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 02:23:06PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stephen Carville:
> > FWIW, it looks like the copies of non-delivery notifications go to
> > bounce_notice_recipient but the messages with the SMTP transactions
> > go to error_notice_recipient. By setting these to different addres
Stephen Carville:
> FWIW, it looks like the copies of non-delivery notifications go to
> bounce_notice_recipient but the messages with the SMTP transactions
> go to error_notice_recipient. By setting these to different addresses
> I can separate the non-delivery notices from the error messages.
FWIW, it looks like the copies of non-delivery notifications go to
bounce_notice_recipient but the messages with the SMTP transactions
go to error_notice_recipient. By setting these to different addresses
I can separate the non-delivery notices from the error messages.
--
Stephen Carville
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:16:47AM -0700, Bob Eastbrook wrote:
> I use wildcard MX records for mail, and a wildcard CNAME for web
> traffic. For example:
>
> *.example.com = MX record for mail.example.com
> *.example.com = CNAME myapp.appspot.com
This is invalid. No DNS domain can res
On Tuesday 13 April 2010 16:32:03 motty.cruz wrote:
> Hello, I seemed to be losing the fight against backscatter email, one of
> our users is getting tons of backscatter spam a day. I'm using postfix
> Mail_version 2.7.0 + amavisd (Spamassassin) on FreeBSD machine. Please
> help!
Did you try this
On 4/13/2010 2:16 AM, Bob Eastbrook wrote:
I use wildcard MX records for mail, and a wildcard CNAME for web
traffic. For example:
*.example.com = MX record for mail.example.com
*.example.com = CNAME myapp.appspot.com
MX records must not point to a CNAME.
Email to b...@foo.examp
Hello, I seemed to be losing the fight against backscatter email, one of our
users is getting tons of backscatter spam a day. I'm using postfix
Mail_version 2.7.0 + amavisd (Spamassassin) on FreeBSD machine. Please help!
# cat header_checks
/^Content-Type: multipart\/report; report-type=d
Zitat von Voytek Eymont :
I just see a number of these entries:
Apr 13 20:45:37 postfix/smtp[31121]: D1F8DB4491F: to=,
relay=mail4.barnet.com.au[202.83.178.125]:25, delay=54911,
delays=54902/0.04/5.4/3.9, dsn=4.1.7, status=deferred (host
mail4.barnet.com.au[202.83.178.125] said: 450 4.1.7 :
Sen
Le 13/04/2010 14:28, Voytek Eymont a écrit :
> I seem to be having problems delivering emails to yahoo, how can I
> troubleshoot this ?
>
> mailq:
> ...
> 777DAB446E8 7709303 Fri Apr 9 12:15:32 a...@googlemail.com
> (lost connection with e.mx.mail.yahoo.com[67.195.168.230] while sending
> end
I seem to be having problems delivering emails to yahoo, how can I
troubleshoot this ?
mailq:
...
777DAB446E8 7709303 Fri Apr 9 12:15:32 a...@googlemail.com
(lost connection with e.mx.mail.yahoo.com[67.195.168.230] while sending
end of data -- message may be sent more than once)
Patric,
> I looked in to it a little more and it looks like Maia re-writes the
> new.sub.domain.com to sub.domain.com.
> I get:
>
> /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[22834]: (22834-04) Checking: [62.127.194.20]
> ->
> ,
>
> When I guess it should be:
>
> /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[22834]: (22834-04) Checking:
Patric Falinder skrev 2010-04-13 11:41:
Wietse Venema skrev 2010-03-29 15:00:
Patric Falinder:
/etc/postfix/recipient_bcc:
/@sub\.domain\.com/
/^(.*)@sub\.domain\.com$/ $...@new.sub.domain.com
Wietse Venema skrev 2010-03-29 14:47:
That first line has no result value.
Patric Falinder:
What
I just see a number of these entries:
Apr 13 20:45:37 postfix/smtp[31121]: D1F8DB4491F: to=,
relay=mail4.barnet.com.au[202.83.178.125]:25, delay=54911,
delays=54902/0.04/5.4/3.9, dsn=4.1.7, status=deferred (host
mail4.barnet.com.au[202.83.178.125] said: 450 4.1.7 :
Sender address rejected: unverif
Bob Eastbrook wrote:
> NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com[68.142.199.123]: 554 5.7.1
> : Relay access denied;
> from= to= proto=SMTP
> helo=
>
This says that the yahoo user tries to send mail addressed to
b...@myapp.appspot.com, not to b...@example.org.
Your mail server is
On Tuesday 13 April 2010 10:16:49 Bob Eastbrook wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Simon Waters wrote:
> > Your post appears mangled beyond hope of direct assistance.
>
> Are you saying that the message was improperly formatted?
No I'm saying I don't think you aren't administering "example
Wietse Venema skrev 2010-03-29 15:00:
Patric Falinder:
/etc/postfix/recipient_bcc:
/@sub\.domain\.com/
/^(.*)@sub\.domain\.com$/ $...@new.sub.domain.com
Wietse Venema skrev 2010-03-29 14:47:
That first line has no result value.
Patric Falinder:
What should I set the result value to?
I got
2010/4/12 mouss
> Alexis Ducastel a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've postfix width dkim-filter installed. Each mail sent from sendmail ,
> > or coming from internet before to be forwarded are delayed of 5 min.
> > Not 4'30, not 5'10 ... but exactly 5 min ! according to received
> > headers, it see
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Simon Waters wrote:
>
> Your post appears mangled beyond hope of direct assistance.
Are you saying that the message was improperly formatted?
>> Remote host said: 554 5.7.1 : Relay access denied
>
> This implies that your server rejected it. So where is the log
On Tuesday 13 April 2010 08:16:47 Bob Eastbrook wrote:
>
Your post appears mangled beyond hope of direct assistance.
> Remote host said: 554 5.7.1 : Relay access denied
This implies that your server rejected it. So where is the log from your
server?
The DNS config you give appears to be a case
Steve put forth on 4/12/2010 10:56 AM:
> AFAIK Outlook often saves the messages in a local Sent folder if you use
> Outlook as a pure IMAP client. On the IMAP server nothing gets saved.
>
> But you are right. All the other clients that I know save the message on the
> server or at least are abl
"Thou shalt not quote RFC whilst composing in HTML or RTF!"
I think that's chiseled on a stone tablet somewhere. If not it should have
been.
--
Stan
Mike Abbott put forth on 4/12/2010 8:56 AM:
>>> + if (in_stream == NULL) {
>>> +/* must fail the entire transaction */
>>> +chat_reset(s
I use wildcard MX records for mail, and a wildcard CNAME for web
traffic. For example:
*.example.com = MX record for mail.example.com
*.example.com = CNAME myapp.appspot.com
Email to b...@foo.example.com gets delivered to mail.example.com, and
web traffic to http://foo.example.com goes
40 matches
Mail list logo
