Hello postfix users,
I have question concerning the hold queue.
I have a smtpd_*_restriction map that puts certain mails in the hold
queue. (E.g. phishing messages).
My idea was to then update the restriction to DISCARD or REJECT the
message and to move the mails out of the hold queue.
However
Wietse Venema wrote:
Claudio Prono:
Hi to all,
Just a question, there is any method to limit the outgoing mails ?
Something like domain.com allowed, domain.net not allowed, or
u...@domain.com allowed, u...@domain.net not allowed. And this can be
done for each user?
Postfix enforces s
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 07:16:58PM -0400, zhong ming wu wrote:
> I don't find anywhere in TLS documentation how to make postfix respect a crl
> so that client's whose certs have been revoked cannot use the submission
> server.
The supported model for submission servers that use client certs is t
zhong ming wu:
> Dear List
>
> I don't find anywhere in TLS documentation how to make postfix respect a crl
> so that client's whose certs have been revoked cannot use the submission
> server.
>
> Can someone please confirm that this feature is supported or not?
If it is not in the documentatio
mouss wrote, On 04/15/2010 06:03 PM:
CT a écrit :
I have several boxes that "check" my relay every 40 seconds to
check that the server is up.
After multiple attempts to get the number of checks reduced I would
like the know the preferred way to block specific IP addresses in Postfix.
I have no
Stan Hoeppner wrote, On 04/15/2010 05:16 PM:
CT put forth on 4/15/2010 4:43 PM:
I have several boxes that "check" my relay every 40 seconds to
check that the server is up.
After multiple attempts to get the number of checks reduced I would
like the know the preferred way to block specific IP ad
it may be a problem in dealing with amavisd perl milter
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] catch-all not working with postfix dovecot lda
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:07:55 +1000, Noel Butler
wrote:
> Postfix must first "know the user(s)"
> therefore this isa postfix issue and not dovecot
> dovecot deliver assum
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:07:55 +1000, Noel Butler
wrote:
> Postfix must first "know the user(s)"
> therefore this isa postfix issue and not dovecot
> dovecot deliver assumes the MTA has verified the user to accept mail
> from and does not do further authentication
>
>
how to build a catch-all wi
Dear List
I don't find anywhere in TLS documentation how to make postfix respect a crl
so that client's whose certs have been revoked cannot use the submission server.
Can someone please confirm that this feature is supported or not?
Thanks
CT a écrit :
> I have several boxes that "check" my relay every 40 seconds to
> check that the server is up.
>
> After multiple attempts to get the number of checks reduced I would
> like the know the preferred way to block specific IP addresses in Postfix.
>
> I have no issue with checks.. but e
Eduardo Júnior put forth on 4/15/2010 4:52 PM:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Eduardo Júnior put forth on 4/15/2010 8:04 AM:
>>
>>> Due the high load of e-mails over my link, I want that
>>> my messages outgoing through more IPs with only postfix box.
>>
>> If you only
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:26:25 +0200, fakessh wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones
> wrote:
>> On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote:
>>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jones
>>> wrote:
On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Ch
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
> On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jones
>> wrote:
>>> On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles Marcus
wrote:
>>
>>
>> I changed the entries @f
CT put forth on 4/15/2010 4:43 PM:
> I have several boxes that "check" my relay every 40 seconds to
> check that the server is up.
>
> After multiple attempts to get the number of checks reduced I would
> like the know the preferred way to block specific IP addresses in Postfix.
>
> I have no iss
On 2010-04-15 Bruno Ribeiro da Silva wrote:
> Hi, I'm having some trouble with my production server, that mailman
> stopped working apparently without any modification. I think
> everything at my postfix configuration is ok, but what I'm seeing is
> that virtual_alias_maps isn't working as expected
On 4/15/2010 3:22 PM, Bruno Ribeiro da Silva wrote:
Hi, I'm having some trouble with my production server, that mailman
stopped working apparently without any modification. I think
everything at my postfix configuration is ok, but what I'm seeing is
that virtual_alias_maps isn't working as expect
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Eduardo Júnior put forth on 4/15/2010 8:04 AM:
>
>> Due the high load of e-mails over my link, I want that
>> my messages outgoing through more IPs with only postfix box.
>
> If you only have one physical link, how will sending mail fro
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, CT wrote:
> I have several boxes that "check" my relay every 40 seconds to
> check that the server is up.
>
> After multiple attempts to get the number of checks reduced I would
> like the know the preferred way to block specific IP addresses in Postfix.
http://www.postfix.o
I have several boxes that "check" my relay every 40 seconds to
check that the server is up.
After multiple attempts to get the number of checks reduced I would
like the know the preferred way to block specific IP addresses in Postfix.
I have no issue with checks.. but every 40 seconds is ridicul
Eduardo Júnior put forth on 4/15/2010 8:04 AM:
> Due the high load of e-mails over my link, I want that
> my messages outgoing through more IPs with only postfix box.
If you only have one physical link, how will sending mail from multiple IPs
within the same subnet solve your link congestion prob
Hi, I'm having some trouble with my production server, that mailman
stopped working apparently without any modification. I think
everything at my postfix configuration is ok, but what I'm seeing is
that virtual_alias_maps isn't working as expected.
My setup consists in one virtual domain example.co
Even if you solve quotes problem, postfix will deliver message to
olpcx@aol.com. Is this what you want?
You may try smtpname option of fetchmail to deliver to local mail user
on postfix server. Or if you do not change "rcpt to", you may try to
deliver directly to mda with "-m" option.
On Fri
* Wietse Venema :
> Normally the queue manager deletes a defer logfile when it brings
> a message into the active queue, and the bounce daemon deletes the
> defer logfile after sending a "mail too old" bounce message.
>
> If the defer file still exists without the message file, some of
> the follo
Stefan Foerster:
> * Wietse Venema :
> > Stefan Foerster:
> > > It was followed by what seemed the normal delivery of a single mail:
> > >
> > > postfix-hub/smtpd[27112]: 1E0DE10003:
> > > client=edge.kvm.incertum.net[192.168.122.13]
> >
> > Right, this is a new message that has claimed the name
Claudio Prono:
> Hi to all,
>
> Just a question, there is any method to limit the outgoing mails ?
> Something like domain.com allowed, domain.net not allowed, or
> u...@domain.com allowed, u...@domain.net not allowed. And this can be
> done for each user?
Postfix enforces such limits while RECE
* Wietse Venema :
> Stefan Foerster:
> > It was followed by what seemed the normal delivery of a single mail:
> >
> > postfix-hub/smtpd[27112]: 1E0DE10003:
> > client=edge.kvm.incertum.net[192.168.122.13]
>
> Right, this is a new message that has claimed the name 1E0DE10003,
> Postfix must not a
El 15/04/10 12:41, ram escribió:
The points mentioned should help you especially ratelimits , and FBL's
Are you planning to do outgoing scanning.
Hi Ram. I believe ratelimits and FBLs can help, but just partially. FBLs
are of great help, but they work only after much harm has been done. For
From: Birta Levente
Subject: DKIM-milter only for outgoing
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:23:12 +0300
> My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter.
>
> In the main.cf:
>
> content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
>
> smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
> non_smtpd_milters =
Hi all
My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter.
In the main.cf:
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
non_smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
milter_protocol = 2
milter_default_action = accept
With this configuration the D
Hi to all,
Just a question, there is any method to limit the outgoing mails ?
Something like domain.com allowed, domain.net not allowed, or
u...@domain.com allowed, u...@domain.net not allowed. And this can be
done for each user?
If is possible, there is any web based or similar tool to manage t
On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles Marcus
wrote:
I changed the entries @fakessh to r...@localhost in /etc/postfix/virtual
postmap then a file to
the po
> Is there some reason the Message-ID won't work as a unique
> identifier?
>
It's about compliance tracking and tagging for specific things.
> You can use a policy server to insert a header based on
> envelope information.
> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
>
> If your header mus
On 4/14/2010 11:02 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
We use a filter to break out and run our spamassassin and other checks. In bash
shell that process, we have a need to insert a custom unique header per email
for compliance. Is there a simple way of doing this without having to go into
any special mime
> Anyone could point me to the respective doc?
how about:
http://www.kutukupret.com/2009/11/30/postfix-smtp-outgoing-ip-rotator-using-iptables/
--
Eero
On 4/15/2010 8:04 AM, Eduardo Júnior wrote:
Hi, all
Due the high load of e-mails over my link, I want that
my messages outgoing through more IPs with only postfix box.
I read about that, but not in official documentation.
I want understand how this works and how to implement.
Anyone could po
Hi, all
Due the high load of e-mails over my link, I want that
my messages outgoing through more IPs with only postfix box.
I read about that, but not in official documentation.
I want understand how this works and how to implement.
Anyone could point me to the respective doc?
Thanks,
--
E
Patric Falinder:
> Ok after a little trail and error I tried to remove the
> "no_address_mappings" from "-o receive_override_options=" in mater.cf
> and it started working:D I did as I first was told, with the options in
> main.cf so I didn't add the -o recipient_bcc_maps =
> regexp:/etc/postfix/re
Stefan Foerster:
> This morning, I got a warning in my logs that I have never seen
> before:
>
> postfix-hub/cleanup[27115]: warning: defer: removed spurious 1E0DE10003 log
Long ago, queue file after {incoming/active/deferred}/1E0DE10003 was
deleted, without removing also removing the file defer/
This morning, I got a warning in my logs that I have never seen
before:
postfix-hub/cleanup[27115]: warning: defer: removed spurious 1E0DE10003 log
It was followed by what seemed the normal delivery of a single mail:
postfix-hub/smtpd[27112]: 1E0DE10003:
client=edge.kvm.incertum.net[192.168.122
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 21:15 +0200, Ignacio García wrote:
> Hi there. Some days ago 1 of our postfix servers was abused by bot
> networks using one of our customer's stolen credentials, inadvertently
> done by a virus/keylogger probably. In few hours more than 2 spam
> messages were in our
40 matches
Mail list logo
