fakessh a écrit :
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles
Curtis a écrit :
It's not documented, because there is no promise that it will work
the same way in a future Postfix version.
However, the names of the records give a hint.
Most particularly, I'm concerned about the following three fields:
named_attribute:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
fakessh a écrit :
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel
Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 4/14/2010
fakessh a écrit :
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
fakessh a écrit :
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel
Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org
Birta Levente a écrit :
Hi all
My postfix server is set up with amavisd-new and dkim-milter.
In the main.cf:
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
non_smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:20209
milter_protocol = 2
milter_default_action =
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:16:04 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
fakessh a écrit :
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
fakessh a écrit :
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones
njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 4/14/2010 3:42 PM, fakessh wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:29:04 +0200, fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:16:04 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
fakessh a écrit :
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net
wrote:
fakessh a écrit :
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones
fakessh a écrit :
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:16:04 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
fakessh a écrit :
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:22 +0200, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
fakessh a écrit :
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:33:43 -0500, Noel Jones
njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 4/14/2010 3:42
Hi
I have some apps on a debian server which use to send mail using
localhost on the same server and I want allow only email sent to this
address u...@domain and reject all other. This is my main.cf
smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Debian/GNU)
biff = no
append_dot_mydomain = no
Israel Garcia a écrit :
Hi
I have some apps on a debian server which use to send mail using
localhost on the same server and I want allow only email sent to this
address u...@domain and reject all other. This is my main.cf
smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Debian/GNU)
biff = no
On 2010-04-17 Israel Garcia wrote:
So, if I test sending mail using mail command or mutt rules does not
work, but, if I use telnet or nc to connect to localhost on 25/tcp
port rule works. Simple question, WHY?
Because mutt et al. submit their mail via pickup, not via smtpd, and
Gary Smith a écrit :
Is there some reason the Message-ID won't work as a unique
identifier?
It's about compliance tracking and tagging for specific things.
You can use a policy server to insert a header based on
envelope information.
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
If
Our mailing list situaton is a little different from what normal list
software handles, so I'm trying to roll my own. I want to use address
extensions to identify the list. /etc/postfix/main.cf includes only
one instance of:
recipient_delimiter = +
For testing, the user sends to testmonkey,
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jim Carter wrote:
I have recipient_delimiter = + in main.cf, but postconf -d reports that
the variable is empty. What could be suppressing setting it?
-d is for DEFAULT. The -n flag is what you use to display non-default
parameter settings. See the postconf(1) for more
14 matches
Mail list logo
