Zitat von Henrik K :
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:06:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I will say generically that for an OP who has the time, avoiding content
filters and using SMTP time blocking methods is probably more
effective in the
long run and makes more efficient use of network and se
On 16 juil. 2010, at 09:27, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> In Germany many companies have given up on content filtering because it is
> not allowed to drop mail after accepting, if there is a chance that private
> mail *could* be involved. So with content filter your only choice would be to
> tag
Am 16.07.2010 09:27, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> Zitat von Henrik K :
>
>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:06:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>>
>>> I will say generically that for an OP who has the time, avoiding content
>>> filters and using SMTP time blocking methods is probably more
>>> effect
Hi Everyone,
I have set up a mail server (on a VM) as per this article:
http://workaround.org/ispmail/lenny
I wish to host this server for a customer. However, I don't think it's "best
practise" to simply place the whole VM in a DMZ and port forward to it. My
question is, what should I do a
Zitat von Robert Schetterer :
Am 16.07.2010 09:27, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Henrik K :
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:06:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I will say generically that for an OP who has the time, avoiding content
filters and using SMTP time blocking methods is probab
Am 16.07.2010 10:15, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> Zitat von Robert Schetterer :
>
>> Am 16.07.2010 09:27, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
>>> Zitat von Henrik K :
>>>
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:06:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> I will say generically that for an OP who has the ti
Zitat von Robert Schetterer :
Am 16.07.2010 10:15, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Robert Schetterer :
Am 16.07.2010 09:27, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Zitat von Henrik K :
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:06:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I will say generically that for an OP who ha
Hi all
i've been looking for a solution to rewrite a non FQDN to a valid domain with
postfix. my users are writing mails to +123...@sms and it should be rewriten to
+123...@sms.provider.tld.
Any ideas?
uwe
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:03:27 +0200
> Von: Robert Schetterer
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix
> Am 16.07.2010 10:15, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> > Zitat von Robert Schetterer :
> >
> >> Am 16.07.2010 09:27
* "Körner, Uwe" :
> Hi all
>
> i've been looking for a solution to rewrite a non FQDN to a valid
> domain with postfix. my users are writing mails to +123...@sms and it
> should be rewriten to +123...@sms.provider.tld.
append_dot_mydomain = yes
mydomain = provider.tld
which is the default, BTW.
Am 16.07.2010 13:10, schrieb Steve:
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:03:27 +0200
>> Von: Robert Schetterer
>> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix
>
>> Am 16.07.2010 10:15, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
>>> Zitat von Ro
Steve wrote:
[big snip]
>> So you have made your point. You prefer (or are required) to have user in
>> control.
>>
> Yes. The big problem is that no solution out there is 100% accurate for all
> users. So the only way to make the user happy is to delegate the control to
> him.
>
Can't speek fo
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:55:17PM +0200, Mikael Bak wrote:
> Steve wrote:
> [big snip]
> >> So you have made your point. You prefer (or are required) to have user in
> >> control.
> >>
> > Yes. The big problem is that no solution out there is 100% accurate for all
> > users. So the only way to ma
* El Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:35:07PM +0200, escribiste:
> * Adrian P. van Bloois :
> > Hi,
> > Can I automagically attach a different disclaimer for each domain?
> > if so, how? Are there different options?
>
> Which program is appending the single disclaimer now?
None at al. :-)
>
> --
> Ralf
* Adrian P. van Bloois :
> > > Can I automagically attach a different disclaimer for each domain?
> > > if so, how? Are there different options?
> >
> > Which program is appending the single disclaimer now?
> None at al. :-)
Well, you can use altermime to add disclaimers, either directly (see
m
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:55:17 +0200
> Von: Mikael Bak
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix
> Steve wrote:
> [big snip]
> >> So you have made your point. You prefer (or are required) to have user
> in
> >> control.
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:09:54 -0500
> Von: Kenneth Marshall
> An: Mikael Bak
> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 02:55:17PM +0200, Mikael Bak wrote:
> > Steve wrote:
> > [big snip]
> >
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 08:06:11PM +0200, Steve wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:09:54 -0500
> > Von: Kenneth Marshall
> > An: Mikael Bak
> > CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
> > Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix
>
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at
On 2010-07-16 2:04 PM, Steve wrote:
> Using something like greylisting is no option either because that
> damn steel price can change a bunch of cents in minutes and then
> multiply that with a gazillion of kilos a ship can transport and
> there you are: a lot of money can be lost by holding back a
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:44:23 -0400
> Von: Charles Marcus
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix
> On 2010-07-16 2:04 PM, Steve wrote:
> > Using something like greylisting is no option either because that
> > damn s
Steve:
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:44:23 -0400
> > Von: Charles Marcus
> > An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> > Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix
Steve, I request that you end this thread.
Wietse
I've been running dovecot + postfix with a MySQL backend for a while now,
and been happy with it.
Now that I want to implement Sieve filtering, I discovered that I'm using
postfix's virtual transport instead of Dovecot's LDA.
Adding virtual_transport = dovecot to the main.cf file and
dovecot u
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 03:28:07PM -0700, Corey Chandler wrote:
> I've been running dovecot + postfix with a MySQL backend for a while now,
> and been happy with it.
>
> Now that I want to implement Sieve filtering, I discovered that I'm using
> postfix's virtual transport instead of Dovecot's LDA
Corey Chandler:
> Jul 16 14:52:13 Leavenworth postfix/pipe[31344]: fatal: user=
> command-line attribute specifies mail system vmail group id 1008
As the error message says, you MUST NOT run non-Postfix programs
with Postfix user or group privileges.
Wietse
Hi Adri,
You can add disclaimer in outgoing mails using altermime. Please follow
the below instruction for configuring postfix with altermime.
http://www.studioc.hu/doc/altermime/html/postfix-altermime-howto-2.html
Regarding different disclaimer for each domain you can tweak the
disclaimer scrip
25 matches
Mail list logo
