Re: why no configure script?

2010-08-04 Thread Matt Hayes
On 08/04/2010 01:23 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote: what's the deal w/ no configure script? you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to install, right? they're not hiding behind that old dodge, are they? i'm so sick of that. if i supply a configure script, will you guys use it? every time i

Re: why no configure script?

2010-08-04 Thread Sahil Tandon
Jay G. Scott: > what's the deal w/ no configure script? There is no deal. > if i supply a configure script, will you guys use it? No. > every time i try to go to a newer version of postfix, the > installation overwrites the previous version. and that > interferes w/ my system documentation. w

Re: How to accept email from unknown servers

2010-08-04 Thread Walter Pinto
You might need to add these to your ok-ipaddresses file zr2usa.com OK vps.zr2usa.com OK nob...@vps.zr2usa.com OK ke...@vps.zr2usa.com OK 67.213.214.192 OK 212.96.160.162 OK It looks like its rejecting the HELO

How to accept email from unknown servers

2010-08-04 Thread Bill Gee
Hello everyone - I have my Postfix server set up to reject mail from servers which are unknown in DNS. Normally that is a good thing, but every now and then I run across one that I want to accept mail from. I have tried several ways to set up the exceptions in Postfix, but so far it is not

Re: dnswl doesn't work?

2010-08-04 Thread Chris St Denis
On 8/4/2010 12:13 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * Chris St Denis: I've setup a dns whitelist from dnswl.org as per the instructions here: http://www.dnswl.org/tech#postfix However I've discovered it doesn't work, because I rejected an email coming from a gmail server that got itself blackliste

Re: why no configure script?

2010-08-04 Thread Phil Howard
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 13:23, Jay G. Scott wrote: > > what's the deal w/ no configure script? > > you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to install, right? > they're not hiding behind that old dodge, are they?  i'm so sick of > that. > > if i supply a configure script, will you guys use

Re: why no configure script?

2010-08-04 Thread Kenneth Marshall
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:50:36PM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:40:29PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: > > On 8/4/2010 1:23 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote: > >> what's the deal w/ no configure script? > >> > >> you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to insta

Re: why no configure script?

2010-08-04 Thread Kenneth Marshall
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:40:29PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: > On 8/4/2010 1:23 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote: >> what's the deal w/ no configure script? >> >> you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to install, right? >> they're not hiding behind that old dodge, are they? i'm s

Re: why no configure script?

2010-08-04 Thread Wietse Venema
Jay G. Scott: > every time i try to go to a newer version of postfix, the > installation overwrites the previous version. and that You can choose the install location. Wietse

Re: why no configure script?

2010-08-04 Thread Jay G. Scott
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:40:29PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: > On 8/4/2010 1:23 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote: >> what's the deal w/ no configure script? >> >> you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to install, right? >> they're not hiding behind that old dodge, are they? i'm s

Re: why no configure script?

2010-08-04 Thread Brian Evans - Postfix List
On 8/4/2010 1:23 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote: what's the deal w/ no configure script? you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to install, right? they're not hiding behind that old dodge, are they? i'm so sick of that. if i supply a configure script, will you guys use it? every time i tr

Re: why no configure script?

2010-08-04 Thread Jay G. Scott
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:33:26PM -0500, Kenneth Marshall wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:23:13PM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote: > > > > what's the deal w/ no configure script? > > > > you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to install, right? > > they're not hiding behind that old dod

Re: why no configure script?

2010-08-04 Thread Kenneth Marshall
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:23:13PM -0500, Jay G. Scott wrote: > > what's the deal w/ no configure script? > > you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to install, right? > they're not hiding behind that old dodge, are they? i'm so sick of > that. > > if i supply a configure script, wil

why no configure script?

2010-08-04 Thread Jay G. Scott
what's the deal w/ no configure script? you do know that you DON'T NEED autoconf/automake to install, right? they're not hiding behind that old dodge, are they? i'm so sick of that. if i supply a configure script, will you guys use it? every time i try to go to a newer version of postfix, the

Re: mailing lists and "unknown mail transport error"

2010-08-04 Thread Wietse Venema
See http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging When Postfix does not receive or deliver mail, the first order of business is to look for errors that prevent Postfix from working properly: % egrep '(warning|error|fatal|panic):' /some/log/file | more Note: the most important message is

mailing lists and "unknown mail transport error"

2010-08-04 Thread Dominik Storck
Hello, I have a problem here with mailing lists. I've configured these as entries in the /etc/aliases like group-x: :include:/etc/group-x.list and corresponding files /etc/group-x.list with one line per (local) recipient This has been working perfectly for years. Now the number of recipie

Re: dnswl doesn't work?

2010-08-04 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Chris St Denis : > I've setup a dns whitelist from dnswl.org as per the instructions > here: http://www.dnswl.org/tech#postfix > > However I've discovered it doesn't work, because I rejected an email > coming from a gmail server that got itself blacklisted by sorbs, but > it is on the whitelist