Hi!
Is there anyone using postfix in cloud, like Amazon ec2?
My questions:
Is this interesting?
The pros and cons..
Other clound sistem...
Why and why not to cloud postfix.
Anyone?
--
-
_Julio Cesar Covolato
0v0
/(_)\ F: 55-11-3129-3366
^ ^ PSI INT
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 08/03/2010 02:05 AM, Edward avanti wrote:
>
> Halo Noel,
>
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It appear from more investigation this cause is SERVFAIL
>>> always send 4xx, can postifx override to 5xx wi
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
See Zip Attachment
I see it. What is this?
-Dennis
On Friday, August 06, 2010 10:35:45 pm junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
> patch policyd-spf (0.8.0) to support rejection of no SPF record.
This is off topic for postfix-users. Please file a bug with the patch and we
can
discuss it in an appropriate venue:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pypolicyd-s
Zhou, Yan:
> Hi there,
>
> I have seen success stories with SMTP AUTH integrating with both MySQL
> and LDAP, but our user/configuration are stored in Oracle 10g database.
> Is there any info. on integrating Postfix with Oracle?
If you use DOVECOT SASL, look in the DOVECOT documentation.
If you
Hi there,
I have seen success stories with SMTP AUTH integrating with both MySQL
and LDAP, but our user/configuration are stored in Oracle 10g database.
Is there any info. on integrating Postfix with Oracle?
Thanks,
Yan
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electro
Manuel Mely:
> Hi,
>
> I've programmed one script for checking the allowed message size for
> every user on my network. I started programming this script based on
> the greylist perl example script that it's in the postfix
> documentation[1] (very nice start point).
> The script is working well bu
Hi,
I've programmed one script for checking the allowed message size for
every user on my network. I started programming this script based on
the greylist perl example script that it's in the postfix
documentation[1] (very nice start point).
The script is working well but i'm having one problem, t
Mike Morris:
> approach. Out of curiosity, what would your reasons be for suggesting
> running postscreen with 2.7 rather than using a 2.8 snapshot? Wouldn't
> similar instability concerns about the latter apply to the former?
The difference is that stable release features not change except
in c
* Alex :
> >> Some non-spam messages have Received headers, but they are always
> >> internal non-routable addresses. The majority of the messages have no
> >> Received headers at all.
> ...
> > Check your header_checks file for IGNORE rules.
>
> Ah, thanks very much. I should have known to check
10 matches
Mail list logo