Hello all
i wrote another anti SPAM framework called Decency, which works perfectly with
Postfix. It's based on Perl POE and Mouse and is highly modularized /
componentized. Since something last week, it has earned it's own website:
http://www.decency-antispam.org
Also on github:
https://githu
Hi all,
Iam trying to setup autoreply via transport on already running
mail server. My problem is transport isn't triggered instead all
vacation emails are going thru none transport.
main.cf:
transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql/transport_maps.cf
in transport table i have:
autoreply.domain
Zitat von Ulrich Kautz :
Hello all
i wrote another anti SPAM framework called Decency, which works
perfectly with Postfix. It's based on Perl POE and Mouse and is
highly modularized / componentized. Since something last week, it
has earned it's own website:
http://www.decency-antispam.o
On 05/25/2011 11:22 AM, houmles wrote:
Hi all,
Iam trying to setup autoreply via transport on already running
mail server. My problem is transport isn't triggered instead all
vacation emails are going thru none transport.
main.cf:
transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql/transport_maps.cf
in
I have virtual_alias_domains=$transport_maps so it should be there.
There is log:
May 25 23:43:40 prusa3 postfix/smtpd[7395]: A4B08382:
client=xxx.xxx.xxx[x.x.x.x]
May 25 23:43:40 prusa3 postfix/cleanup[7398]: A4B08382:
message-id=<4ddd6c14.9030...@domain.com>
May 25 23:43:40 prusa3 pos
On 05/25/2011 11:13 PM, houmles wrote:
I have virtual_alias_domains=$transport_maps so it should be there.
There is log:
May 25 23:43:40 prusa3 postfix/smtpd[7395]: A4B08382:
client=xxx.xxx.xxx[x.x.x.x]
May 25 23:43:40 prusa3 postfix/cleanup[7398]: A4B08382:
message-id=<4ddd6c14.9030..
On 5/25/2011 4:13 PM, houmles wrote:
I have virtual_alias_domains=$transport_maps so it should be
there.
What a terrible idea. What happens when you (or someone else)
decides to add yahoo.com or hotmail.com or a wildcard default
to transport_maps?
Use a dedicated map to define domains.
T
* Robert Schetterer wrote :
>* Am 24.05.2011 13:43, schrieb Noel Jones:
>>* On 5/24/2011 2:38 AM, Troy Piggins wrote:
>>
>>> Just curious if it's possible to pass messages that match certain
>>> header checks to postgrey instead of flat out rejecting them. The
>>> reason I ask is that I was trying