--On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 7:58 PM -0400 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
This is extremely difficult to reproduce, but it does happen
occasionally -- We will tell postfix to stop, and once that is
complete, a "postdrop" process will sometimes remain, and will run
until it is
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> This is extremely difficult to reproduce, but it does happen occasionally
> -- We will tell postfix to stop, and once that is complete, a "postdrop"
> process will sometimes remain, and will run until it is manually killed.
>
> Is this an expected behavior of postdrop -- T
This is extremely difficult to reproduce, but it does happen occasionally
-- We will tell postfix to stop, and once that is complete, a "postdrop"
process will sometimes remain, and will run until it is manually killed.
Is this an expected behavior of postdrop -- That after the master postfix
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:21:39 +0200
Tobias Hachmer articulated:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:23:26 +0300, gaby wrote:
> > Use Win Xp Sp3,outllok express,the CA certificate is stored in
> > trusted
> > Root Certification Authorities and it is imported with success.
> > In the other device (Nokia Phone)
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:23:26 +0300, gaby wrote:
Use Win Xp Sp3,outllok express,the CA certificate is stored in
trusted
Root Certification Authorities and it is imported with success.
In the other device (Nokia Phone) answer about CA certificate is only
once,then phone email is normal functionaly
Use Win Xp Sp3,outllok express,the CA certificate is stored in trusted Root
Certification Authorities and it is imported with success.
In the other device (Nokia Phone) answer about CA certificate is only
once,then phone email is normal functionaly,without any answer.
- Original Message --
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:34:08 +0300, gaby wrote:
I use postfix with TLS optiion.I create certificates in same mod as
postfix documentation.It is Ok,postfix is perfect functionaly
I import CA certificate from PEM format in DER format then was
installed
in
wihttps://www.hachmer.de/?_task=mail&_id
Dieter Modig:
> said: 450 Requested mail action not taken: mailbox unavailable (in reply
> to RCPT TO command))
Wietse:
> That is NOT a Postfix error message. To fix this, look at the OTHER
> mail system whose name and IP address you helpfully deleted.
Dieter Modig:
> they have a malfunction how
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:54:21AM -0300, Lima Union wrote:
> Hi all!
> Unfourtunately the link posted in http://www.postfix.org/addon.html
> for 'crm114 Postfix howto by Eugene Borukhovich' is broken (google
> didnt't help either), does anyone by chance have that document? I'm
> trying to setup a
Hi all!
Unfourtunately the link posted in http://www.postfix.org/addon.html
for 'crm114 Postfix howto by Eugene Borukhovich' is broken (google
didnt't help either), does anyone by chance have that document? I'm
trying to setup a low volume/resources antispam system (any other
recommendation is welc
No Problem at all.
Seems you are using an "self-signed" Cert.
You can buy cheap domain validated ssl certs by 59€ / year i mean to
remember.
Then this message wont show up.
Or you Accept the Cert in the mailclient , then this message also is
not shown.
In thunderbird you can do this, dunno how
Hi
I use postfix with TLS optiion.I create certificates in same mod as postfix
documentation.It is Ok,postfix is perfect functionaly
I import CA certificate from PEM format in DER format then was installed in
windows as trusted certificate.
When I send email with outlook,or outlook express,i
Artica seems not any more under develpment since 2009
Last Changes was 2009
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 13:33:34 +0200, David Touzeau
wrote:
Take a look here
Open Source solution.
Tried to perform Complex settings such has multiples postfix
instances
Postfix upgrade by compilation supported
Dieter Modig:
> -> said: 450 Requested mail action not taken: mailbox unavailable (in reply
> to RCPT TO command))
That is NOT a Postfix error message. To fix this, look at the OTHER
mail system whose name and IP address you helpfully deleted.
Wietse
Vladimir Vassiliev:
>
> Hi all,
>
> i'm trying to setup commercial spam filter with postfix. It works with
> Sendmail using milter
> protocol, but with Postfix I've got in logs:
>
> Aug 31 11:34:11 master postfix/cleanup[8458]: warning: milter
> inet:127.0.0.1:2266: malformed reply:
> 550 Th
Hi!
I have stumbled across a problem I don't understand. I have an email
address that several users in my domain send email to. For a while now
(they claim it previously worked) one of them can send email to the
recipient and the other can not. I've tried as well with my domain local
account an
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:12:12AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> The server replies with 502 because LMTP uses LHLO, while SMTP uses
> HELO or EHLO, and for good reasons: the protocol has different
> replies for multi-recipient email.
Doh... I was confused and thought it was connecting to por
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:01:56 -0400, John Peach
wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:10:29 +0200
Michael Weissenbacher wrote:
On Wed Aug 31 2011 12:01:20 GMT+0200 (CET),
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> annyone can acknowledge that following dnsbl services are not
> reachable?
>
> zen.spamhaus.org*2D
On Wednesday 31 August 2011 05:01:20 we...@zackbummfertig.de wrote:
> annyone can acknowledge that following dnsbl services are not
> reachable?
>
> zen.spamhaus.org*2DOWN
Spamhaus lists are not free for certain uses. If you have exceeded
allowed free use from a single IP address, you
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:10:29 +0200
Michael Weissenbacher wrote:
> On Wed Aug 31 2011 12:01:20 GMT+0200 (CET),
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > annyone can acknowledge that following dnsbl services are not
> > reachable?
> >
> > zen.spamhaus.org*2DOWN
> > b.barracudacentral.orgDOWN
> >
Jan-Frode Myklebust:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:16:36AM +0200, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> > I would like to point postfix' virtual_transport at several addresses
> > for lmtp delivery, and hopefully want postfix to gracefully handle that
> > any one of them might be down.
> >
> > virtual_
On Wed Aug 31 2011 12:01:20 GMT+0200 (CET), wrote:
> Hello,
>
> annyone can acknowledge that following dnsbl services are not reachable?
>
> zen.spamhaus.org*2DOWN
> b.barracudacentral.orgDOWN
> bl.spamcop.net*2
> combined.rbl.msrbl.net*2
> ix.dnsbl.manitu.net*2DOWN
> dnsrbl.
> ix.dnsbl.manitu.net*2DOWN
works fine here from germany.
Hello,
annyone can acknowledge that following dnsbl services are not
reachable?
zen.spamhaus.org*2DOWN
b.barracudacentral.orgDOWN
bl.spamcop.net*2
combined.rbl.msrbl.net*2
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net*2DOWN
dnsrbl.swinog.ch*2
dnsbl.njabl.org*2no-more-funn.moensted.dk
db.wpbl.info
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:16:36AM +0200, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> I would like to point postfix' virtual_transport at several addresses
> for lmtp delivery, and hopefully want postfix to gracefully handle that
> any one of them might be down.
>
> virtual_transport = lmtp:loadbalancers.
Hi all,
i'm trying to setup commercial spam filter with postfix. It works with Sendmail using milter
protocol, but with Postfix I've got in logs:
Aug 31 11:34:11 master postfix/cleanup[8458]: warning: milter inet:127.0.0.1:2266: malformed reply:
550 The message has been rejected by spam filt
I would like to point postfix' virtual_transport at several addresses
for lmtp delivery, and hopefully want postfix to gracefully handle that
any one of them might be down.
virtual_transport = lmtp:loadbalancers.example.com:24
What's the best way of doing that? Will simple rr-dns work:
27 matches
Mail list logo
