On Oct 2, 2011, at 5:28 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Sahil Tandon:
>> On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 12:34:41 -0700, Cameron Smith wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 2, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>>>
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 10:29:20 -0700, Cameron Smith wrote:
> telnet 74.63.3.132 smtp
> Tr
Sahil Tandon:
> On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 12:34:41 -0700, Cameron Smith wrote:
>
> > On Oct 2, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 10:29:20 -0700, Cameron Smith wrote:
> > >
> > >> telnet 74.63.3.132 smtp
> > >> Trying 74.63.3.132...
> > >> Connected to alwaysbuywh
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 12:34:41 -0700, Cameron Smith wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 10:29:20 -0700, Cameron Smith wrote:
> >
> >> telnet 74.63.3.132 smtp
> >> Trying 74.63.3.132...
> >> Connected to alwaysbuywholesale.com.
> >> Escape charact
Le lundi 3 octobre 2011 01:05, vous avez écrit :
> Have you used sasl auth with packages built from this rpm? I've had a heck
> of a time trying to build with the pertinent features enabled on centos 5.
>
> Joe
sasl authentication for sending mail works, but the package that manages the
authentica
hello postfix list
I just updated to version postfix 2.8.5 with
the source rpm package
http://www.invoca.ch/pub/packages/postfix/RPMS/ils-5/SRPMS/
I made some changes to the file. spec
Is this correct. this does not compromise my security of my system
my file .spec
http://pastebin.com/rH5uGR
Simeon Ott:
> and how did you guys configure gnarwl without having these problems?
> am i the only one who experienced this with GNARWL? that sounds a
> bit strange to me.
First, few sites use BATV.
Second, BATV works perfectly fine with autoresponders that adhere
to mail standards: a) reply to
On 02.10.2011, at 20:26, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Simeon Ott:
>>> What happens when you send mail by hand to prvs=whatever@whatever?
>>>
>>> $ echo this is a test | /usr/sbin/sendmail prvs=whatever@whatever
> ...
>> Oct 2 18:54:05 ares postfix/smtp[17722]: 1795B2C64AC:
>> to=,
>> relay=mail.mess
On Oct 2, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 10:29:20 -0700, Cameron Smith wrote:
>
>> telnet 74.63.3.132 smtp
>> Trying 74.63.3.132...
>> Connected to alwaysbuywholesale.com.
>> Escape character is '^]'.
>> 220 vps.velvetpixel.net ESMTP Postfix <--This is not a matc
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 10:29:20 -0700, Cameron Smith wrote:
> telnet 74.63.3.132 smtp
> Trying 74.63.3.132...
> Connected to alwaysbuywholesale.com.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 vps.velvetpixel.net ESMTP Postfix <--This is not a match :(
>
> How do I change the SMTP banner for just the vhost
Simeon Ott:
> > What happens when you send mail by hand to prvs=whatever@whatever?
> >
> > $ echo this is a test | /usr/sbin/sendmail prvs=whatever@whatever
...
> Oct 2 18:54:05 ares postfix/smtp[17722]: 1795B2C64AC:
> to=,
> relay=mail.messaging.microsoft.com[65.55.88.22]:25, delay=0.98,
> de
On Sep 29, 2011, at 7:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Cameron Smith:
>>
>> On Sep 29, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>
>>> Cameron Smith:
For my system would like the domain name listed there to be the
domain that lives on that IP but the headers show:
Received: from www.a
On 02.10.2011, at 16:20, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> i invoked gnarwl by hand and the same thing happend. it sends an
>> email to instead of whatever@whatever.
>
> What happens when you send mail by hand to prvs=whatever@whatever?
>
> $ echo this is a test | /usr/sbin/sendmail prvs=whatever@whateve
Am 02.10.2011 17:22, schrieb Tolga:
> On 02-10-2011 18:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 02.10.2011 13:47, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
>>> there's a difference between telling people they need to do something in
>>> order
>>> to get help and insulting them. If you want to help people just do it
On 02-10-2011 18:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.10.2011 13:47, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
there's a difference between telling people they need to do something in order
to get help and insulting them. If you want to help people just do it, if you
don't want to help them then don't. In any cas
Am 02.10.2011 13:47, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
> there's a difference between telling people they need to do something in order
> to get help and insulting them. If you want to help people just do it, if you
> don't want to help them then don't. In any case stop being so aggressive.
sorry, bu
> i invoked gnarwl by hand and the same thing happend. it sends an
> email to instead of whatever@whatever.
What happens when you send mail by hand to prvs=whatever@whatever?
$ echo this is a test | /usr/sbin/sendmail prvs=whatever@whatever
Wietse
Thanks Wietse for your help!
On 02.10.2011, at 14:59, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Simeon Ott:
>> On 30.09.2011, at 19:25, Simeon Ott wrote:
>>
>>> hello,
>>>
>>> i recently configured gnarwl autoresponder on my mailserver. the
>> autoresponder works great as long as the sender doesn't use BATV.
>> o
Simeon Ott:
> On 30.09.2011, at 19:25, Simeon Ott wrote:
>
> > hello,
> >
> > i recently configured gnarwl autoresponder on my mailserver. the
> autoresponder works great as long as the sender doesn't use BATV.
> otherwise the autoresponded message is not delivered to the origin
> sender. is ther
On 30.09.2011, at 19:25, Simeon Ott wrote:
> hello,
>
> i recently configured gnarwl autoresponder on my mailserver. the
> autoresponder works great as long as the sender doesn't use BATV. otherwise
> the autoresponded message is not delivered to the origin sender. is there a
> possibility to
On 30.09.2011, at 19:25, Simeon Ott wrote:
> hello,
>
> i recently configured gnarwl autoresponder on my mailserver. the
> autoresponder works great as long as the sender doesn't use BATV. otherwise
> the autoresponded message is not delivered to the origin sender. is there a
> possibility to
Harald,
* Reindl Harald :
>
> Am 02.10.2011 10:50, schrieb Tolga:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Oct 2 12:36:52 vps postfix/smtpd[16208]: warning: SASL: Connect to
> > private/auth failed: Permission denied
> >
> > From these logs I understand that auth permissions return to the way it
> > used to be, becau
Am 02.10.2011 10:50, schrieb Tolga:
> Hi,
>
> Oct 2 12:36:52 vps postfix/smtpd[16208]: warning: SASL: Connect to
> private/auth failed: Permission denied
>
> From these logs I understand that auth permissions return to the way it used
> to be, because last
> time I chown'd it to postfix:postf
* Tolga :
> Oct 2 12:35:18 vps postfix/smtpd[16201]: warning: SASL: Connect to
> private/auth failed: Permission denied
> Oct 2 12:35:18 vps postfix/smtpd[16201]: fatal: no SASL authentication
> mechanisms
> Oct 2 12:35:19 vps postfix/master[9841]: warning: process
> /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 1
Hi,
Oct 2 12:35:18 vps postfix/smtpd[16201]: warning: SASL: Connect to
private/auth failed: Permission denied
Oct 2 12:35:18 vps postfix/smtpd[16201]: fatal: no SASL authentication
mechanisms
Oct 2 12:35:19 vps postfix/master[9841]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 16201 exit status
24 matches
Mail list logo
