[Wietse]
I just stubled across this thread:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/90005
We could take a bold step and do it in two "main stream" MTAs,
damn the torpedoes.
Let's not call it a bold step, let's call it a bottom-up approach ;-). I
can't speak for Oracle, but I wou
* Claus Assmann :
> Per RCPT filtering is a feature that is often asked by ISPs who
> offer anti-spam/virus for their customers: some pay for additional
> filtering.
In Germany you either reject globally in session, and stick with the law, or
you reject post-queue per recipient.
Adding functional
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> * Claus Assmann :
> > Per RCPT filtering is a feature that is often asked by ISPs who
> > offer anti-spam/virus for their customers: some pay for additional
> > filtering.
>
> In Germany you either reject globally in session, and stick with
> the law, or you reject post-queu
Wietse wrote:
> To make per-recipient end-of-data replies useful with Postfix, PRDR
> would need to be supported by at least one third-party content
> inspection mechanism (such as Amavisd-new or Milter), because I see
> no obvious user interface for PRDR with Postfix header/body_checks.
>
> - SMT
I have been puzzled over this for a while and do not know what causes the
problem or what is really happening.
I have two internet mail relay servers, let's call them mr1 and mr2. Both are
identical in configuration but have different host names and ip addresses are
running simultaneously. Ev
On 11/23/2011 9:52 AM, Islam, Towhid wrote:
> I have been puzzled over this for a while and do not know what causes the
> problem or what is really happening.
>
> I have two internet mail relay servers, let's call them mr1 and mr2. Both
> are identical in configuration but have different host n
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:11:55AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> To make per-recipient end-of-data replies useful with Postfix, PRDR
> would need to be supported by at least one third-party content
> inspection mechanism (such as Amavisd-new or Milter), because I see
> no obvious user interface fo
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:29:54AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 9:52 AM, Islam, Towhid wrote:
> > I have been puzzled over this for a while and do not know what causes the
> > problem or what is really happening.
> >
> > I have two internet mail relay servers, let's call them mr1
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:23:11PM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Wietse wrote:
> > To make per-recipient end-of-data replies useful with Postfix, PRDR
> > would need to be supported by at least one third-party content
> > inspection mechanism (such as Amavisd-new or Milter), because I see
> > no o
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:11:55AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > To make per-recipient end-of-data replies useful with Postfix, PRDR
> > would need to be supported by at least one third-party content
> > inspection mechanism (such as Amavisd-new or Milter), because I see
> >
postfix 2.9.2019 warns me:
unused parameter: smtpd_client_connection_limit_exceptions
Yet if I remove this option from master.cf, I soon reach the connection
limit at the pre-queue content filter's re-entry smtpd service:
421-4.7.0 mail.ijs.si Error: too many connections from ::1
451 4
Hello,
I've got a postfix system running mysql virtual mailbox domains and
dspam hooked in to it. I've got a test user called test1 and have
hooked in dspam in to my setup. I'm having an issue with the alias
addresses.
To my database I've added:
INSERT INTO `mail`.`virtual_aliases` (
`id`,
`
Mark Martinec:
> postfix 2.9.2019 warns me:
>
> unused parameter: smtpd_client_connection_limit_exceptions
The problem is that postconf no longer parses parameter values
that have their default value.
You can work around this with an explicit
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_client_event_l
On 2011-11-23 21:05, Mark Martinec wrote:
postfix 2.9.2019 warns me:
unused parameter: smtpd_client_connection_limit_exceptions
Yet if I remove this option from master.cf, I soon reach the connection
limit at the pre-queue content filter's re-entry smtpd service:
421-4.7.0 mail.ijs.s
> > -o smtpd_client_connection_limit_exceptions=0.0.0.0/0
Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> This is probably old code, since postconf(5) says:
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions
>
> *smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions(
> default: $mynetworks )*
>
> Clients
On Wednesday 23 November 2011 14:14:03 David Mehler wrote:
> I've got a postfix system running mysql virtual mailbox domains and
> dspam hooked in to it. I've got a test user called test1 and have
> hooked in dspam in to my setup. I'm having an issue with the alias
> addresses.
>
> To my database
Wietse Venema:
> Mark Martinec:
> > postfix 2.9.2019 warns me:
> >
> > unused parameter: smtpd_client_connection_limit_exceptions
>
> The problem is that postconf no longer parses parameter values
> that have their default value.
Actually, the "unused parameter" detector never looked at
bu
Hi
Why would postfix log "lost connection after DATA from
ns.0.us.jsdaav.net[98.158.177.54]" after receiving a mail that contains
the following hyperlink?
mailto:diseasemanagem...@bestmed.co.za";
target="_blank"
title="blocked::mailto:diseasemanagem...@bestmed.co.za";>title=
Bennie Joubert:
> Hi
>
> Why would postfix log "lost connection after DATA from
> ns.0.us.jsdaav.net[98.158.177.54]" after receiving a mail that contains
> the following hyperlink?
Because something decides to break the connection and it isn't Postfix.
Look for "security" products such as firew
root@pinkie:/var/log# postqueue -p
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
808AD1858E* 459339 Wed Nov 23 17:20:37 i...@dpsdirect.us
@brookeagent.com
2BDBF18581* 459337 Wed Nov 23 17:50:25 i...@dpsdirect.us
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 02:03:17 +, wrote:
> root@pinkie:/var/log# postqueue -p
> -Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
> 808AD1858E* 459339 Wed Nov 23 17:20:37 i...@dpsdirect.us
> @brookeagent.com
>
> 2BDBF18581* 459
Hello,
I don't know where I can send feedback , so I send it here.
I have read the "README_FILES/SASL_README" in the postfix source folder.
And I found that some strange sentences appear in the file.I use kate as
the text reader , and I can see many "right" symbols(or something you
called it "t
On Wednesday 23 November 2011 20:31:51 蔡火胜 wrote:
> I have read the "README_FILES/SASL_README" in the postfix source
> folder. And I found that some strange sentences appear in the
> file.I use kate as the text reader , and I can see many "right"
> symbols(or something you called it "tick",freque
于 2011年11月24日 10:56, /dev/rob0 写道:
> On Wednesday 23 November 2011 20:31:51 蔡火胜 wrote:
>> I have read the "README_FILES/SASL_README" in the postfix source
>> folder. And I found that some strange sentences appear in the
>> file.I use kate as the text reader , and I can see many "right"
>> symbols
Oh , I have found the html version . Sorry .
于 2011年11月24日 10:56, /dev/rob0 写道:
> On Wednesday 23 November 2011 20:31:51 蔡火胜 wrote:
>> I have read the "README_FILES/SASL_README" in the postfix source
>> folder. And I found that some strange sentences appear in the
>> file.I use kate as the text re
Thanks Viktor, for you have diagnosed my problem to the point.
>>Typically this also means that the DNS view of the domain's MX
>>records as seen by the servers is likely the external one, but
>>they probably need an internal view that presents only the internal
>>SMTP servers for the domain.
Thi
Is there some way to enumerate the bounce queue and flush it?
27 matches
Mail list logo
