On 02/20/2012 11:27 PM, Peter wrote:
On 21/02/12 09:10, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 02/20/2012 03:45 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
When starting a new thread, please do not reply to an existing one;
make it a new message. This one contains irrelevant threading
information in the headers, which causes a pro
On 21/02/12 09:10, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 02/20/2012 03:45 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>> When starting a new thread, please do not reply to an existing one;
>> make it a new message. This one contains irrelevant threading
>> information in the headers, which causes a problem for thread-aware
>> mail
On 2/20/12 3:10 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 02/20/2012 03:45 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>> When starting a new thread, please do not reply to an existing one;
>> make it a new message. This one contains irrelevant threading
>> information in the headers, which causes a problem for thread-aware
>> mail
Christopher Koeber:
> Fair enough. Just an enhancement I was willing to add if available.
>
Before you consider any steps toward design, I suggest that you start reading
http://www.postfix.org/bounce.5.html
to understand that only a minute portion of the entire return message
is "unstructur
Fair enough. Just an enhancement I was willing to add if available.
Regards,
Christopher Koeber
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt <
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> wrote:
> * Christopher Koeber :
> > Usability concern (making sure the message was easier to read for those
> who
> >
* Christopher Koeber :
> Usability concern (making sure the message was easier to read for those who
> needed the formatting).
Believe me: Nobody reads those.
And those who do don't care about HTML.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Be
Usability concern (making sure the message was easier to read for those who
needed the formatting).
And yes, an ASCII version would be made available.
Regards,
Christopher Koeber
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:26:26 -0500
> Christopher Koeber articulate
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:26:26 -0500
Christopher Koeber articulated:
> Quick question. Is HTML formatting possible in Postfix bounce
> messages? I saw the bounce guide and customized it but not sure if
> HTML formatting is possible.
Even if it is possible, for what conceivable reason would you want
Hello,
Quick question. Is HTML formatting possible in Postfix bounce messages? I
saw the bounce guide and customized it but not sure if HTML formatting is
possible.
Thanks.
Regards,
Christopher Koeber
On 02/20/2012 03:45 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
When starting a new thread, please do not reply to an existing one;
make it a new message. This one contains irrelevant threading
information in the headers, which causes a problem for thread-aware
mail readers. Thanks.
I'm curious which these are - I h
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 04:42:21PM +0100, Przemysław.Orzechowski wrote:
> Now that i know what is happening i will have to somehow setup a delivery
> route that will not exceed those limits.
Why do you have to work around arbitrary limits?
Bastian
--
"Get back to your stations!"
On 2/20/2012 9:42 AM, Przemysław.Orzechowski wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 07:00:11 -0600, Stan Hoeppner
> wrote:
>> On 2/20/2012 5:45 AM, Przemysław.Orzechowski wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Feb 19 10:47:27 panel2 postfix/smtp[10854]: 56F7A8ED0DC:
>>> to=,
>>> relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25,
>>
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 07:00:11 -0600, Stan Hoeppner
wrote:
> On 2/20/2012 5:45 AM, Przemysław.Orzechowski wrote:
>
>
>> Feb 19 10:47:27 panel2 postfix/smtp[10854]: 56F7A8ED0DC:
>> to=,
>> relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25,
>> conn_use=7, delay=24703, delays=22811/1887/0.02/5.3, dsn=4.7.
On 19/02/2012 17:05, Michael Laris wrote:
I am looking for someone who might be willing to donate some time to help me
get this configured properly. It is for a good cause.
I have replied offlist. Dog rescues are close to my heart :-)
When starting a new thread, please do not reply to an existing one;
make it a new message. This one contains irrelevant threading
information in the headers, which causes a problem for thread-aware
mail readers. Thanks.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 02:35:10PM +0100, Dragan Zubac wrote:
> Postfix is
Hello
Postfix is running on a server with domain : domain.com
Is it possible to have Postfix configured to forward emails only if
To,CC or BCC fields contain the following domains :
- test.com
- example.com
Forwarding emails that has To,CC or BCC fields containing destination
addresses for othe
On 2/20/2012 5:45 AM, Przemysław.Orzechowski wrote:
> Feb 19 10:47:27 panel2 postfix/smtp[10854]: 56F7A8ED0DC:
> to=, relay=mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146]:25,
> conn_use=7, delay=24703, delays=22811/1887/0.02/5.3, dsn=4.7.1,
> status=deferred (host mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.147.146] said: 450
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 04:30:55 -0600, Stan Hoeppner
wrote:
> On 2/20/2012 12:10 AM, Przemysław.Orzechowski wrote:
>
>> One of my clients made a setup that all her mails are forwarded to
remote
>> ISP
>> Unfortunatly i noticed that sometimes i get 450 error from destination
>> ISP
>> this triggers
Hi,
We would like to block ONLY user somebad...@example.net so that he can't
send mail to myu...@example.com.
Does the following look sane?
smtpd_restriction_classes = controlled_senders, otherclass1, otherclass2
controlled_senders = check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/blocked_senders
/et
On 2/20/2012 12:10 AM, Przemysław.Orzechowski wrote:
> One of my clients made a setup that all her mails are forwarded to remote
> ISP
> Unfortunatly i noticed that sometimes i get 450 error from destination ISP
> this triggers Delivery Failure Notice wich is naturally sent to this ISP
450 is a t
20 matches
Mail list logo
