hy,
thanks for replay.
my server postfix use smarthost smart-relay.mail.inet.it
the relay has been blocked because the address generated spam from:
freeelo...@hotmail.it
this is log for /var/log/mailllog:
May 8 08:18:41 neruda postfix/smtpd[3062]: BE80AB81E65:
client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
May 8
Giuseppe Perna:
this is log for /var/log/mailllog:
May 8 08:18:41 neruda postfix/smtpd[3062]: BE80AB81E65:
client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
May 8 08:18:43 neruda postfix/cleanup[3208]: BE80AB81E65:
message-id=62105.176.61.140.133.1336457923.squirrel@176.61.140.133
...
perhaps using the webmail
Hi Wietse,
That was the missing piece that got left out in my migration. I would
like to clean up that old version and I see that you wrote the comments
in the generic installed file so I have a question as I am not sure I
completely understand the function.
Essentially I want any outgoing
thanks for repaly,
this is log foe webmail:
176.61.140.133 - - [08/May/2012:08:18:41 +0200] GET
/src/compose.php?mail_sent=yes HTTP/1.1 200 556825
https://webmail.esempio.it/src/compose.php; Opera/9.80 (Windows NT
6.1; U; en) Presto/2.10.229 Version/11.61
176.61.140.133 - - [08/May/2012:08:18:43
Am 10.05.2012 14:10, schrieb Giuseppe Perna:
thanks for repaly,
this is log foe webmail:
176.61.140.133 - - [08/May/2012:08:18:41 +0200] GET
/src/compose.php?mail_sent=yes HTTP/1.1 200 556825
https://webmail.esempio.it/src/compose.php; Opera/9.80 (Windows NT
6.1; U; en) Presto/2.10.229
Dennis Putnam:
Hi Wietse,
That was the missing piece that got left out in my migration. I would
like to clean up that old version and I see that you wrote the comments
in the generic installed file so I have a question as I am not sure I
completely understand the function.
Essentially
Giuseppe Perna:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
thanks for repaly,
this is log foe webmail:
176.61.140.133 - - [08/May/2012:08:18:41 +0200] GET
/src/compose.php?mail_sent=yes HTTP/1.1 200 556825
https://webmail.esempio.it/src/compose.php; Opera/9.80 (Windows NT
6.1; U;
Hi Wietse,
Sorry for not being clear but I was not asking what those parameters
should be but rather if they even need to be specified. I was referring
to the comments in the generic file that refers to them. It was not
clear if I needed to really set them or not in order for the generic
Am 10.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Giuseppe Perna:
perhaps using the webmail with this ip 176.61.140.133
BE80AB81E65:
message-id=62105.176.61.140.133.1336457923.squirrel@176.61.140.133
your squirrelmail may get hacked by old version bugs and or php bugs
and using binary postfix sendmail for sending
Dennis Putnam:
Hi Wietse,
Sorry for not being clear but I was not asking what those parameters
should be but rather if they even need to be specified. I was referring
If you don't specify a parameter, it gets a built-in default setting
(see postconf -d parametername).
Again, if I knew
Hi Wietse,
Sorry, I am properly chastised. I simply did not see that link in the
comments.
On 05/10/2012 08:45 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Dennis Putnam:
Hi Wietse,
Sorry for not being clear but I was not asking what those parameters
should be but rather if they even need to be specified. I
On May 10, 2012, at 14:40, James Seymour wrote:
On Wed, 09 May 2012 01:22:27 +0200
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
Den 2012-05-08 15:43, Jona - DTNX Postmaster skrev:
The '550 ... rejected:' is Postfix, the rest is the reply Postfix
got from the SPF policy daemon. Customizing that
Off topic, but related to this thread.
I/we use Squirrelmail and while we have not had any problems with it I
wonder (and as this is this list seems to be the home of email gurus) if
there are any recommendations as to a better solution, particularly one
that would work in a postfix/dovecote
Am 10.05.2012 19:09, schrieb john:
Off topic, but related to this thread.
I/we use Squirrelmail and while we have not had any problems with it I
wonder (and as this is this list seems to be the home of email gurus) if
there are any recommendations as to a better solution, particularly one
On Thu, 10 May 2012, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 10.05.2012 19:09, schrieb john:
I/we use Squirrelmail and while we have not had any problems with it I
wonder (and as this is this list seems to be the home of email gurus) if
there are any recommendations as to a better solution,
* Jozsef Kadlecsik kad...@blackhole.kfki.hu:
I dunno. We had the newest squirrelmail (1.4.22) and still two times user
sessions were hijacked and used for spamming. The users could not recall
what they exactly did, unfortunately.
Only thing one can do against this is two-factor auth
Le 10/05/2012 19:09, john a écrit :
Off topic, but related to this thread.
I/we use Squirrelmail and while we have not had any problems with it I
wonder (and as this is this list seems to be the home of email gurus) if
there are any recommendations as to a better solution, particularly one
On Thu, 10 May 2012, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Jozsef Kadlecsik kad...@blackhole.kfki.hu:
I dunno. We had the newest squirrelmail (1.4.22) and still two times user
sessions were hijacked and used for spamming. The users could not recall
what they exactly did, unfortunately.
Only
Sorry about the top post, but i wanted to give anybody who looked the
earliest opportunity to skip as I was off topic.
Perhaps I should have started a new thread.
John A
Den 2012-05-10 14:40, James Seymour skrev:
Eh? Explain, please?
check_policy_service must be after reject_unlisted_recipient
# example fault
check_policy_service inet:10.3.19.214:10031
reject_unlisted_recipient
if port 10031 is a greylist daemon it will greylist users that does not
exists
Den 2012-05-10 16:21, DTNX Postmaster skrev:
If they even read the error message to begin with, heh.
do one need to know how to change a wheel on a wagon to drive it ? :=)
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 09:43:07 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
...
By the way, what is going on with your DNS? Why do both DNSBL replies
arrive (almost) simultaneously after two seconds?
My bad. postscreen reports 'DNSBL rank' after two seconds.
Phew. At least we're on the same page in
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 11:29:01 -0400, Rod K wrote:
Was wondering if anyone would be willing to share what DNSBL and
weights they are using with Postscreen.
Mine are adapted from a previous post by /dev/rob0:
postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 3
postscreen_dnsbl_sites =
zen.spamhaus.org*3
Am 10.05.2012 21:28, schrieb Jozsef Kadlecsik:
On Thu, 10 May 2012, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 10.05.2012 19:09, schrieb john:
I/we use Squirrelmail and while we have not had any problems with it I
wonder (and as this is this list seems to be the home of email gurus) if
there are any
24 matches
Mail list logo
