Postfix and subaddressing (plus) problem

2012-07-08 Thread lutz . niederer
Hi! We use Postfix and Dovecot (with Dovecot LDA). Normal subaddressing works. So if I send to john+foo the mail comes up in john's folder foo. How about subfolders of foo? Can/should that work, too? How do I write the subfolder of a folder in an email address? We did change the imap

got local delivery where there should be delivery via dovecot to virtual mbox

2012-07-08 Thread Christopher J. Ruwe
Hello, I am currently fighting against a postfix-dovecot installation, wich I have taken from another functional server and adapted IPs and names. The new installation is behaving differently in so much as the new one delivers locally where the old one delivers using dovecot and virtual

Re: Postfix and subaddressing (plus) problem

2012-07-08 Thread Wietse Venema
lutz.niede...@gmx.net: Hi! We use Postfix and Dovecot (with Dovecot LDA). Normal subaddressing works. So if I send to john+foo the mail comes up in john's folder foo. How about subfolders of foo? Can/should that work, too? How do I write the subfolder of a folder in an email address?

Re: got local delivery where there should be delivery via dovecot to virtual mbox

2012-07-08 Thread Wietse Venema
Christopher J. Ruwe: I am currently fighting against a postfix-dovecot installation, wich I have taken from another functional server and adapted IPs and names. The new installation is behaving differently in so much as the new one delivers locally where the old one delivers using dovecot and

Re: Postfix and subaddressing (plus) problem

2012-07-08 Thread James B. Byrne
I cannot answer for Dovecot's behavior but in Cyrus-imap one does this: mailbox+folder.subfolder.sub-subfol...@example.com The spectators between subfolders is configurable in c-I and I speculate that the same is true in other imap implementations. Check the imap permissions on direct delivery

Re: got local delivery where there should be delivery via dovecot to virtual mbox

2012-07-08 Thread Christopher J. Ruwe
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 09:07:14 -0400 (EDT) Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote: Christopher J. Ruwe: I am currently fighting against a postfix-dovecot installation, wich I have taken from another functional server and adapted IPs and names. The new installation is behaving differently in

Re: got local delivery where there should be delivery via dovecot to virtual mbox

2012-07-08 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 7/8/2012 3:20 PM, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote: Jul 8 22:09:28 mail postfix/local[1999]: 144761410: to=test@muellerbackwaren.local, relay=local, delay=0.97, delays=0.54/0.03/0/0.4, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (unknown user: test) By default, for local delivery, Postfix looks up user names in

Re: got local delivery where there should be delivery via dovecot to virtual mbox

2012-07-08 Thread Wietse Venema
Christopher J. Ruwe: Jul 8 22:09:28 mail postfix/local[1999]: 144761410: to=test@muellerbackwaren.local, relay=local, delay=0.97, delays=0.54/0.03/0/0.4, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (unknown user: test) That is were I was before. How can I, without having a named to nameserve proper

Post upgrade problem(?)

2012-07-08 Thread Rick Zeman
Just upgraded to 3.93 from 3.62 from source (amazingly smooth make upgrade after skipping 3 years of interim versions. Easier than using an rpm!). I fixed the TLS database location warnings that cropped up in the logs, but I'm also seeing: Jul 8 21:51:51 tux postfix/verify[28749]: close

Re: got local delivery where there should be delivery via dovecot to virtual mbox

2012-07-08 Thread Noel Jones
On 7/8/2012 4:18 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 7/8/2012 3:20 PM, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote: Jul 8 22:09:28 mail postfix/local[1999]: 144761410: to=test@muellerbackwaren.local, relay=local, delay=0.97, delays=0.54/0.03/0/0.4, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (unknown user: test) By default, for

Re: Post upgrade problem(?)

2012-07-08 Thread Noel Jones
On 7/8/2012 9:09 PM, Rick Zeman wrote: Just upgraded to 3.93 from 3.62 from source (amazingly smooth make upgrade after skipping 3 years of interim versions. Easier than using an rpm!). I fixed the TLS database location warnings that cropped up in the logs, but I'm also seeing: Jul 8

Hook into the Postfix sending process

2012-07-08 Thread Thomas Spycher
Hi I'm working for a Swiss Company and developing a special mail system. Open Source is the company's wide philosophy. The Application takes a new mail from a customer, does some magic stuff with it (with content filters), and then sends it out to the original recipient. The Server does only