Re: OpenSSL: TXT_DB error number 2

2012-11-24 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 07:55:28PM -0500, c...@lavabit.com wrote: SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO: unknown protocol Check the server logs. /var/log/mail.info: warning: cannot get RSA private key from file /etc/postfix/smtpd.pem: disabling TLS support warning: TLS library

Re: [OT] Non-interactive Debian (aptitude) install

2012-11-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, November 23, 2012 11:05:42 PM Glenn Park wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Scott Kitterman post...@kitterman.com wrote: On Friday, November 23, 2012 09:29:08 PM Glenn Park wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Scott Kitterman post...@kitterman.com wrote: On

Lamentation and query

2012-11-24 Thread Dennis Carr
So I went and looked at O'Reilly Publications, as they had, for me, been the historical go-to for tech documentation of all flavors. Imagine my dismay, then, when I find that the cricket book (DNS and BIND) was current for version 9.3, but more to the point for this list's topic, Postfix has

Re: Lamentation and query

2012-11-24 Thread Dennis Carr
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Dennis Carr wrote: I miss my dead tree versions being current. =/ and having said all this, I realize I forgot the query, but it may be foregone. =) Does anyone know who's currently published the most recent documentation for Postfix in a dead-tree form? -Dennis

enabling double delivery for some users

2012-11-24 Thread Patrick Proniewski
Hello, I want to enable double delivery for selected users into my MX servers. My MX servers (I have two, load balanced through a Cisco ACE) are only relay servers, once filtered and accepted, emails are transported to a gateway that performs, if needed address rewrite, and dispatch. On MX

Re: Lamentation and query

2012-11-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Dennis Carr: On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Dennis Carr wrote: I miss my dead tree versions being current. =/ and having said all this, I realize I forgot the query, but it may be foregone. =) Does anyone know who's currently published the most recent documentation for Postfix in a

Re: Lamentation and query

2012-11-24 Thread Dennis Carr
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Wietse Venema wrote: Dennis Carr: and having said all this, I realize I forgot the query, but it may be foregone. =) Does anyone know who's currently published the most recent documentation for Postfix in a dead-tree form? Have you tried a bookseller's search

Re: Lamentation and query

2012-11-24 Thread Glenn English
On Nov 24, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Dennis Carr wrote: Checking bookfinder, though, it appears that much of what's out there seems to only be as recent as 2004. =/ My Book of Postfix (No Starch Press) is a year newer than that -- well done, but still significantly out of date. Have you

Re: enabling double delivery for some users

2012-11-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Patrick Proniewski: What would be the best way to do this? I've though about using bcc maps, something like this: user1@domain user1@training.domain user2@domain user2@training.domain but in case of failure on the training server side, the From: address would get an delivery error

Re: enabling double delivery for some users

2012-11-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: Patrick Proniewski: What would be the best way to do this? I've though about using bcc maps, something like this: user1@domainuser1@training.domain user2@domainuser2@training.domain but in case of failure on the training server side, the From:

Re: enabling double delivery for some users

2012-11-24 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 03:09:59PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: Any help greatly appreciated! Patrick Postfix built-in mechanisms to add recipients are reliable in the sense that the sender will be informed of delivery errors. To add a recipient without notification, use an

Re: [OT] Non-interactive Debian (aptitude) install

2012-11-24 Thread Glenn Park
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Scott Kitterman post...@kitterman.com wrote: On Friday, November 23, 2012 11:05:42 PM Glenn Park wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Scott Kitterman post...@kitterman.com wrote: On Friday, November 23, 2012 09:29:08 PM Glenn Park wrote: On Fri, Nov 23,

Re: enabling double delivery for some users

2012-11-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Viktor Dukhovni: On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 03:09:59PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: Any help greatly appreciated! Patrick Postfix built-in mechanisms to add recipients are reliable in the sense that the sender will be informed of delivery errors. To add a recipient without

Re: enabling double delivery for some users

2012-11-24 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: Viktor Dukhovni: On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 03:09:59PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: Any help greatly appreciated! Patrick Postfix built-in mechanisms to add recipients are reliable in the sense that the sender will be informed of delivery errors. To add

Re: enabling double delivery for some users

2012-11-24 Thread Patrick Proniewski
On 24 nov. 2012, at 23:40, Wietse Venema wrote: I believe the same properties hold with recipients added via recipient_bcc_maps (automatic NOTIFY=NEVER up to the last forward-path MTA that supports DSN). Therefore, it may be simpler to use bcc maps, rather than implement a proxy filter or

filter spam messages with maildrop

2012-11-24 Thread Jumping Mouse
Hi Everyone,  I am trying to filter out emails that have been flagged as spam using Maildrop but am not able to get it to work. Here is my configuration: (I want to create .Junkmail folder if it does not exist, sub-scribe .Junkmail folder and move all email with X-Spam-Flag= Yes to the