Re: troubleshooting inability to receive email: should I see a process running on port 25?

myPhone'dan gönderdim 18 Oca 2013 tarihinde 07:25 saatinde, Reindl Harald şunları yazdı: > > > Am 18.01.2013 06:13, schrieb Tracy Wise: >> Thanks Reindl. >> >> I do indeed have that line in main.cf . >> >> However in master.cf there is a slight difference. Mi

Re: troubleshooting inability to receive email: should I see a process running on port 25?

Am 18.01.2013 06:13, schrieb Tracy Wise: > Thanks Reindl. > > I do indeed have that line in main.cf . > > However in master.cf there is a slight difference. Mine > says: > > smtp unix - - n - - smtp this is NOT the smtpd

Re: troubleshooting inability to receive email: should I see a process running on port 25?

Thanks Reindl. I do indeed have that line in main.cf. However in master.cf there is a slight difference. Mine says: smtp unix - - n - - smtp Notice "unix" instead of "inet". Do you think that's the problem? But I would think it should be set right out of t

Re: troubleshooting inability to receive email: should I see a process running on port 25?

Am 18.01.2013 05:50, schrieb Tracy Wise: > Should there be a postfix process running on port 25, in order for me to > receive mail? If so then at least I know > what direction to go in troubleshooting. > > Any guidance would be greatly appreciated main.cf: inet_interfaces = all master.cf: sm

troubleshooting inability to receive email: should I see a process running on port 25?

Hi I'm setting up a dedicated server from 1&1 Internet which has CentOS 6.3 with Postfix 2.8.4 and Plesk 11.0.9 pre-installed. Though I've added the main domain name (and set the server hostname to be the same), and a mailbox for that domain, in Plesk, and set Plesk to activate mail for the domain

Re: RBLs, submission port, and permit_sasl_authenticated

On 1/17/2013 4:42 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > > With testing, I have the following for 465/submission. Thanks again > for the pointers! I used reject_unauth_destination because with > just "reject", some of my mail tests failed. That implies you were sending unauthenticated mail to a loca

Re: RBLs, submission port, and permit_sasl_authenticated

--On Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:26 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Hi Noel, I don't think postfix will start (or at least won't start this service) with both smtpd_recipient_restricions and smtpd_relay_restrictions set empty. Yeah, I just ran into that in testing the changes in more

Re: RBLs, submission port, and permit_sasl_authenticated

--On Thursday, January 17, 2013 4:12 PM -0600 Noel Jones wrote: On 1/17/2013 3:56 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: --On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 10:53 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Submission and "smtps" perform essentially the same function, and should get identical settings, with

Re: RBLs, submission port, and permit_sasl_authenticated

On 1/17/2013 3:56 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 10:53 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount > wrote: > >>> Submission and "smtps" perform essentially the same function, and >>> should get identical settings, with the obvious addition of tls >>> wrappermode for smtps. >>

Re: RBLs, submission port, and permit_sasl_authenticated

--On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 10:53 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: Submission and "smtps" perform essentially the same function, and should get identical settings, with the obvious addition of tls wrappermode for smtps. Perfect, thank you very much! Ok, I've modified my master.cf f

Re: Balancing destination concurrency + rate delay

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Steve Jenkins: > > yahoo_destination_concurrency_limit = 4 > > yahoo_destination_recipient_limit = 2 > > yahoo_destination_rate_delay = 1s > > As documented, rate_delay enforces a delay BETWEEN deliveries to > the same destination, and there

Re: Balancing destination concurrency + rate delay

Steve Jenkins: > yahoo_destination_concurrency_limit = 4 > yahoo_destination_recipient_limit = 2 > yahoo_destination_rate_delay = 1s As documented, rate_delay enforces a delay BETWEEN deliveries to the same destination, and therefore, the concurrency to that destination is always 1. I see no way

Re: smtp_fallback_relay and greylistst

Rafael Azevedo: > > Yes, you can, as long as the MTAs run on the SAME HOST. > > Hmm.. Is there anyway we can have multiple postfix instances sharing > the same queue? Definitely not. Wietse

Re: Backup server

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote: > Am 17.01.2013 07:59, schrieb Muhammad Yousuf Khan: >> i want to plan a backup postfix server for minimizing the downtime. i >> have read about MX record entry to use as backup server . but this if >> for pure postfix only in my case i wil

Re: Relay access denied

On 17 January 2013 18:40, Ansgar Wiechers wrote: > On 2013-01-17 Muzaffer wrote: > > On 17 January 2013 16:17, Noel Jones wrote: > >> On 1/17/2013 3:58 AM, Muzaffer wrote: > >>> Is there a simpler way of making postfix accept mail for all the > >>> domains I'm hosting, than adding them one by on

Re: Fiddling with smtp_fallback_relay

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > I know you're not Steve. > No.. I AM Steve! ;)

Re: smtp_fallback_relay and greylistst

Rafael Azevedo: > > smtp_bind_address sets the SOURCE IP address. > > Yes, but I cant have 2 servers with same smtp_bind_address Yes, you can, as long as the MTAs run on the SAME HOST. Wietse

Re: smtp_fallback_relay and greylists

> smtp_bind_address sets the SOURCE IP address. Yes, but I cant have 2 servers with same smtp_bind_address - Rafael

Re: smtp_fallback_relay and greylists

Steve Jenkins: > Could this be achieved with a single instance of Postfix on one > host machine configured for 2+ virtual domains with the same domain > name ( mailer1.example.com, mailer2.example.com, etc.), or would > it need to be two separate instances of Postfix running on the > same host? Th

Re: smtp_fallback_relay and greylists

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > host = computer (operating system on top of real or virtual hardware) > MTA = postfix > > The text in main.cf assumes that both non-fallback and fallback > MTA run on the same host and that they send mail from the same > source IP address. Y

prevent sasl auth when login in form user@domain

Hello list, I'm using postfix 2.6.6 with cyrus-sasl (saslauthd + pam_mysql). Everything works ok, except that I've noticed that users can login successfully using their username with an arbitrary @domain part, that is I see login success in 2 cases: - username = user - username = u...@whatever.d

Re: Relay access denied

On 1/17/2013 10:28 AM, Muzaffer wrote: > > > On 17 January 2013 16:17, Noel Jones > wrote: > > On 1/17/2013 3:58 AM, Muzaffer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there a simpler way of making postfix accept mail for all the > > domains I'm hosting, than

Re: Relay access denied

On 2013-01-17 Muzaffer wrote: > On 17 January 2013 16:17, Noel Jones wrote: >> On 1/17/2013 3:58 AM, Muzaffer wrote: >>> Is there a simpler way of making postfix accept mail for all the >>> domains I'm hosting, than adding them one by one to >>> $virtual_alias_domains? >> >> In addition to listing

Re: Relay access denied

On 17 January 2013 16:17, Noel Jones wrote: > On 1/17/2013 3:58 AM, Muzaffer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there a simpler way of making postfix accept mail for all the > > domains I'm hosting, than adding them one by one to > > $virtual_alias_domains? > > > > Regards, > > In addition to listing the

Re: Relay access denied

On 1/17/2013 3:58 AM, Muzaffer wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a simpler way of making postfix accept mail for all the > domains I'm hosting, than adding them one by one to > $virtual_alias_domains? > > Regards, In addition to listing the domains in main.cf, postfix can read from an sql database or fr

Re: smtp_fallback_relay and greylists

Rafael Azevedo: > > A host is a computer (or virtual machine). myhostname is a Postfix > > parameter. Now plug these into the context of Wietse's statement to you > > and you should understand. > > Thanks Stan! > > But if I point it to another host (different than myhostname) it > will send thr

Re: Recommendations for antivirus

On Jan 17, 2013, at 09:25, Jamie Griffin wrote: > * Ned Slider [2013-01-17 04:25:04 +]: > >> On 16/01/13 22:20, Erwan David wrote: >>> Le 16/01/2013 23:17, Terry Gilsenan a écrit : > -Original Message- > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > us...

Re: Deferred mail

Muzaffer: > Hi, > > I fear I might have misconfigured. Here's my logs: > > Jan 17 06:14:20 ommuse postfix/smtp[25504]: BC05AF629A: to=< > x...@gmail.com>, relay=none, delay=116212, > delays=116107/0.02/105/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to > alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[74.125.

Re: smtp_fallback_relay and greylists

> A host is a computer (or virtual machine). myhostname is a Postfix > parameter. Now plug these into the context of Wietse's statement to you > and you should understand. Thanks Stan! But if I point it to another host (different than myhostname) it will send through another IP right? I'm not

Re: smtp_fallback_relay and greylists

On 1/17/2013 5:16 AM, Rafael Azevedo wrote: > Could you please tell me the difference of "same host" and "myhostname"? A host is a computer (or virtual machine). myhostname is a Postfix parameter. Now plug these into the context of Wietse's statement to you and you should understand. -- Stan

Re: Fiddling with smtp_fallback_relay

On 1/16/2013 6:49 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stan Hoeppner > wrote: >> And BTW, if you're not a spammer... > Gotit - thanks. I am certainly NOT a spammer. I know you're not Steve. I should have said "as you're not a spammer.." instead of "if you're..." -- St

Re: smtp_fallback_relay and greylists

> It says use the same host. It does not say use the same > myhostname setting. Wietse, Could you please tell me the difference of "same host" and "myhostname"? What I understood from the document is that its suggested to use the same host/ip to re-send the message in cases of greylists. In my

Re: Messages stucked in maildrop folder

Just to share with everyone (in case somebody see this problem in the future), it seems to be fixed after I added this to main.cf: mailbox_command = /usr/bin/maildrop -d ${USER} After that all messages went through. BR - Rafael - Mensagem original - De: "Rafael Azevedo" Para: "Postfix

Messages stucked in maildrop folder

Hi Guys, I noticed that a specific SMTP has lots of files on maildrop folder, and I dont know why postfix is not sending theses messages neither to its destination or back to sender. I tried reading this document (http://www.postfix.org/MAILDROP_README.html) but could not understand how to fix

Re: smtp_fallback_relay and greylists

> It says use the same host. It does not say use the same > myhostname setting. Thanks once again Wietse! Your help is very appreciated. I'll try to work on this. BR, - Rafael

Relay access denied

Hi, Is there a simpler way of making postfix accept mail for all the domains I'm hosting, than adding them one by one to $virtual_alias_domains? Regards,

Re: Backup server

Am 17.01.2013 07:59, schrieb Muhammad Yousuf Khan: > i want to plan a backup postfix server for minimizing the downtime. i > have read about MX record entry to use as backup server . but this if > for pure postfix only in my case i will be running round cube, dovecot > for IMAP storage. how is that

Re: Recommendations for antivirus

Am 16.01.2013 22:55, schrieb TFML: > I'm running a server on average week we receive 14,000, send 19,000, and in > total deferred/bounced/rejected 5,000 -- Can you guys recommend a good > antivirus that will work well with postfix. Meaning efficient in processing > emails without dropping them i

Re: Recommendations for antivirus

On 01/17/2013 09:25 AM, Jamie Griffin wrote: * Ned Slider [2013-01-17 04:25:04 +]: On 16/01/13 22:20, Erwan David wrote: Le 16/01/2013 23:17, Terry Gilsenan a écrit : -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of T

Re: Recommendations for antivirus

* Ned Slider [2013-01-17 04:25:04 +]: > On 16/01/13 22:20, Erwan David wrote: > >Le 16/01/2013 23:17, Terry Gilsenan a écrit : > >>>-Original Message- > >>>From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- > >>>us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of TFML > >>>Sent: Thursday, 17 Ja