On Jul 23, 2013, at 16:17, Jerry wrote:
> Of course. this assumes that you are attempting to install Postfix via
> the ports system.
I am not, though db48 was installed via ports. I'm on my phone so it's hard to
check, but I thought I included the make line I used to build postfix and what
I
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:29:51 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema articulated:
> LuKreme:
> > Given that I have db48 installed from ports under FreeBSD, what
> > is the appropriate flag to pass to compile postfix against this
> > rather than the ?default?
>
> To build with Berkeley DB 4.8 installed from /us
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:34:02AM +0400, ??? ? wrote:
> Hello all, can't find which variables I could use in smtpd_banner
> except of $myhostname/$mail_name? Is that possible to use
> $client_address?
There are no variables in smtpd_banner. You're confused by generic
support for re
??? ?:
> Hello all, can't find which variables I could use in smtpd_banner
> except of $myhostname/$mail_name? Is that possible to use
> $client_address?
Postfix behavior is documented. If something is missing please post
a bug report.
As documented at the top of "man 1 postconf",
Hello all, can't find which variables I could use in smtpd_banner except of
$myhostname/$mail_name? Is that possible to use $client_address?
LuKreme:
> Given that I have db48 installed from ports under FreeBSD, what
> is the appropriate flag to pass to compile postfix against this
> rather than the ?default?
To build with Berkeley DB 4.8 installed from /usr/ports, you have
to specify the location of the include file and of the object
l
Given that I have db48 installed from ports under FreeBSD, what is the
appropriate flag to pass to compile postfix against this rather than the
“default”
db48-4.8.26.0 is in databases/db48 databases/db48
I previously compiled postfix with the following:
make -f Makefile.init makefiles 'CCARGS
Florin Andrei:
> I apologize for not being more specific at the beginning. I appreciate
> the fact that support is offered here freely for everyone, it's a great
> help.
>
> I am getting the impression that it's not possible to make routing
> decisions based on sender *before* making decisions
On Jul 23, 2013, at 22:25, Florin Andrei wrote:
> I apologize for not being more specific at the beginning. I appreciate the
> fact that support is offered here freely for everyone, it's a great help.
>
> I am getting the impression that it's not possible to make routing decisions
> based on s
I apologize for not being more specific at the beginning. I appreciate
the fact that support is offered here freely for everyone, it's a great
help.
I am getting the impression that it's not possible to make routing
decisions based on sender *before* making decisions based on recipient.
AFAIC
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:49:00PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Not surprisingly this fails, and you need TLS for connections to 127.0.0.1,
> that would be just a waste of CPU (if it worked). So:
For the record: s/and you need/and you don't need/
--
Viktor.
Thanks for your prompt answer.
>Not surprisingly this fails, and you need TLS for connections to 127.0.0.1,
>that would be just a waste of CPU (if it worked).
I tried to disable TLS and it worked well but I didn't found how to disable
it only for DKIM and keep it on smtp and smtpd.
It works perfec
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 08:33:35AM -0700, sandrouin wrote:
> I have the same problem, the TLS work fine for the request of the mail and
> for send the mail but not for the DKIM relay.
> I tried with a self-signed certificate and with a CA signed certificate but
> none of them solve it.
>
> conten
Hello,
I have the same problem, the TLS work fine for the request of the mail and
for send the mail but not for the DKIM relay.
I tried with a self-signed certificate and with a CA signed certificate but
none of them solve it.
here is my postconf -n, I changed my domains names:"dns.name.tld" is my
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 07:54:38AM +0200, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 03:45:35PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > They don't have "hairpin NAT" set up, whereby if I try to
> > connect to this NATed IP address it would go to the router
> > and come back to me. I'm fine with that, actuall
15 matches
Mail list logo
