Hi,
while the documentation for mailbox_size_limit
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mailbox_size_limit
explicitly states "[...] or zero (no limit).", the doc for
message_size_limit
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#message_size_limit
doesn't mention that it's possible to turn off the li
Am 11.04.2014 06:53, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
> Note that various vendor SSL updates for "Heartbleed" may not
> exhibit the issue. For example, Debian wheezy back-ported just the
> relevant bug-fix to without back-porting the new padding extension.
> I also expect similar (fortunate) behaviour on
On Fri 11/Apr/2014 01:40:13 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On April 10, 2014 7:24:54 PM EDT, LuKreme wrote:
>>On 10 Apr 2014, at 17:01 , Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:57:54AM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>>>
Which, IM(ns)HO is what every list should not do. I actua
Markus Sch?nhaber:
> Hi,
>
> while the documentation for mailbox_size_limit
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mailbox_size_limit
> explicitly states "[...] or zero (no limit).", the doc for
> message_size_limit
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#message_size_limit
> doesn't mention th
11.04.2014 13:14, Wietse Venema:
> Markus Sch?nhaber:
>> Hi,
>>
>> while the documentation for mailbox_size_limit
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mailbox_size_limit
>> explicitly states "[...] or zero (no limit).", the doc for
>> message_size_limit
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.ht
Hi , anyone knows this rbl ?
http://v4bl.org/about.html
...
A very extensive list of IPs; which include:
» Well known spammer IPs
» UBE/UCE abusive IPs
» rfc-ignorant IPs
» IPs with mismatched DNS and RDNS (FCrDNS failure)
» IPs with mismatched rDNS and EHLO/HELO (FCrDNS failu
We are encountering problems sending to certain servers are enforcing the renego TLS patch. Our postfix instances do a TLS negotiation but then defer the message with an EHLO handshake error.Should this be working in Postfix v2.9+ ? Or is there something we can set to allow this for some domains
Bill Lewis:
> We are encountering problems sending to certain servers are enforcing
> the renego TLS patch. Our postfix instances do a TLS negotiation
> but then defer the message with an EHLO handshake
> error.Should this be working in Postfix v2.9+
> ? Or is there something we can set to allow th
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 01:30:43PM -0500, Bill Lewis wrote:
>We are encountering problems sending to certain servers are enforcing
>the renego TLS patch.
What do you mean by "renego TLS patch"? What specific servers?
>Our postfix instances do a TLS negotiation but
>then defer th
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Markus Sch?nhaber:
>> Hi,
>>
>> while the documentation for mailbox_size_limit
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mailbox_size_limit
>> explicitly states "[...] or zero (no limit).", the doc for
>> message_size_limit
>> http://www.post
Rick Zeman:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Markus Sch?nhaber:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> while the documentation for mailbox_size_limit
> >> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mailbox_size_limit
> >> explicitly states "[...] or zero (no limit).", the doc for
> >> message_s
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:32:17PM +0100, Sean Wilson wrote:
> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-and-TLS-1-2-td66859.html
> I am battling to understand why my Postfix server doesn't always
> use a TLS 1.2 connection with clients that support it. I currently
> have the latest version
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 07:38:30AM +0100, Sean Wilson wrote:
> > > So why is only TLS 1.1 being used?
> >
> > Ask the postmaster of the MTA in question, perhaps they some problems
> > with remote MTAs choking on TLSv1.2 and decided to apply hammer to
> > problem.
>
> *This is what I don't unders
13 matches
Mail list logo
