Hi,
I've noticed, that my Postfix installation does select in some
caes (especially if Postfix is running on both ends)
AECDH-AES256-SHA instead of ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384. The
receiving Postfix does support ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 and
connections with that cipher are possible.
But if Pos
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 11:53:45AM +0200, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> I've noticed, that my Postfix installation does select in some
> caes (especially if Postfix is running on both ends)
> AECDH-AES256-SHA instead of ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384. The
> receiving Postfix does support ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-
Hi Viktor,
On Saturday, 02 Aug 2014 15:32 +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > I've noticed, that my Postfix installation does select in some
> > caes (especially if Postfix is running on both ends)
> > AECDH-AES256-SHA instead of ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384. The
> > receiving Postfix does support E
[Please CC me on replies.]
Hi,
running 2.11.1 on Debian wheezy, I noticed the following in my mail.log today:
weasel@eugeni:~$ grep mx02.posteo.de /var/log/mail.log | grep 'connection est'
} Aug 1 09:59:59 s_local@eugeni postfix/smtp[22481]: Untrusted TLS connection
established to mx02.posteo.
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 08:14:04PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> running 2.11.1 on Debian wheezy, I noticed the following in my mail.log today:
>
> weasel@eugeni:~$ grep mx02.posteo.de /var/log/mail.log | grep 'connection est'
> } Aug 1 09:59:59 s_local@eugeni postfix/smtp[22481]: Untrusted TL
Am 02.08.2014 um 20:14 schrieb Peter Palfrader:
> [Please CC me on replies.]
>
> Hi,
>
> running 2.11.1 on Debian wheezy, I noticed the following in my mail.log today:
>
> weasel@eugeni:~$ grep mx02.posteo.de /var/log/mail.log | grep 'connection est'
> } Aug 1 09:59:59 s_local@eugeni postfix/sm
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > } Aug 1 09:59:59 s_local@eugeni postfix/smtp[22481]: Untrusted TLS
> > connection established to mx02.posteo.de[89.146.194.165]:25: TLSv1.2 with
> > cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)
>
> For what recipient domains. You need to fi
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 08:54:18PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> sorry too short in time for more debug
Could you alert someone the fragile DNS state of posteo.de? They
really should not be dependent on just a single sys4.de nameserver
for any length of time.
--
Viktor.
Am 02.08.2014 um 21:16 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 08:54:18PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> sorry too short in time for more debug
>
> Could you alert someone the fragile DNS state of posteo.de? They
> really should not be dependent on just a single sys4.de nameserve
