-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi List ,
i have followed the guide on workaround and at the end of it i have
authentications issues with thunderbird ,on workaround there is a
local test for authentication and it was successfull .Thunderbird says
i have chosen the wrong auth mechan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
these are more logs:
dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts in 4 secs):
user=, rip=1.2.3.4, lip=4.5.6.7, TLS handshaking: SSL_accept()
failed: error:14094418:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:tlsv1 alert
unknown ca: SSL alert number 48, sess
nobody73:
> these are more logs:
>
> dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts in 4 secs):
> user=, rip=1.2.3.4, lip=4.5.6.7, TLS handshaking: SSL_accept()
> failed: error:14094418:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:tlsv1 alert
> unknown ca: SSL alert number 48, session=
This mailing list is
El 08/09/2014 14:39, nobody73 escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Auth-sql.conf.ex has
passdb {
driver = sql
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext
}
[...]
where in passdb dovecot-sql.conf.ex has:
default_pass_scheme = PLAIN-MD5
If this is the only content of y
Hi,
I send you the configuration of Postfix.
$ postconf -nf
alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
command_directory = /usr/local/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/local/libexec/postfix
data_dire
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:47:02PM +0200, giacomo wrote:
> I send you the configuration of Postfix.
Change the password for this account:
Username: d.lis...@gruppoisil.com
Compromised Password: lisaia
> smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
> smtpd_sasl_local_domain = $mydomain
> smtpd_sasl_secu
Hi,
A number of our zimbra customers deploy where they are hosting accounts for
multiple domains (At least one client hosts over 100,000 domains). These
deployments generally use a single set of MTAs for their MX records, which
works fine as long as TLS is not involved. However, with the inc
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 04:43:36PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> A number of our zimbra customers deploy where they are hosting accounts for
> multiple domains (At least one client hosts over 100,000 domains). These
> deployments generally use a single set of MTAs for their MX records, whic
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 04:43:36PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>
> > A number of our zimbra customers deploy where they are hosting accounts for
> > multiple domains (At least one client hosts over 100,000 domains). These
> > deployments generally use a single set of MTAs
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:22:54PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I'd like to hear a bit more on this from other people than Viktor.
> There is a difference between "technically perfect" (e.g., telling
> everyone to adopt DNSSSEC and DANE or else don't bother), and what
> is "currently justifiable"
* Wietse Venema :
> Viktor Dukhovni:
> > Which works just fine with a single certificate, because TLS in
> > SMTP in generally unauthenticated. If all the various domains
> > share the same MX hostnames, many implementations that log
> > "speculative" authentication results (no actual enforcement,
11 matches
Mail list logo
