On 19 Sep 2014, at 20:58 , Ruben Safir ru...@mrbrklyn.com wrote:
I used fetchmail to retreive email from the university and it hands off
the local system which cause the mail to try to be forward to
localhost.com. Obviously I've made a big error somewhere, but I can't
track it down
$ dig
* A. Schulze s...@andreasschulze.de:
Benny Pedersen:
Ralf Hildebrandt skrev den 2014-09-19 11:20:
Is the Address verification functionality callable via an invocation
of the sendmail compatability binary?
sendmail -bv root
sure, simple :-)
but would be nice to simply get a
Ralf Hildebrandt:
sendmail -bv root
sure, simple :-)
but would be nice to simply get a returncode 0/1 instead a message.
I assume that's what Ralf is searching.
A message would be ok, since it could go back into a script via a pipe.
Choose a suitable envelope sender address:
On September 20, 2014 3:47:42 PM wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
$ sendmail -f sender -bv recipient
Is postfix default sender not good here ?
Final-Recipient: rfc822; u...@example.com
Action: undeliverable
Status: 4.4.4
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; connect to host[addr]:25:
Benny Pedersen:
Final-Recipient: rfc822; u...@example.com
Action: undeliverable
Status: 4.4.4
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; connect to host[addr]:25: Operation timed out
Is this a real life example ?, if it cant connect it would still be in
verify queue, no ?
Yes. It is anonymized.
Does the following address the problem? This fixes the responses for:
check_reverse_client_hostname_access
check_reverse_client_hostname_a_access
check_reverse_client_hostname_mx_access
check_reverse_client_hostname_ns_access
Basically, with all SMTP server responses of the form
thank you - looka promising!
could you attach this as unified diff-file?
that makes it easy to include it in rpmbuild for test/feedback
copypaste usually damages something in patches
Am 21.09.2014 um 02:08 schrieb Wietse Venema:
Does the following address the problem? This fixes the responses
li...@rhsoft.net:
thank you - looka promising!
could you attach this as unified diff-file?
The patch is unified diff format. It just does not have some of the
garbage that some version control systems add around it. Let me know
if this is a problem.
Wietse
that makes it easy to
Am 21.09.2014 um 02:30 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
thank you - looks promising!
could you attach this as unified diff-file?
The patch is unified diff format. It just does not have some of the
garbage that some version control systems add around it. Let me know
if this is a
Wietse Venema:
Does the following address the problem? This fixes the responses for:
check_reverse_client_hostname_access
check_reverse_client_hostname_a_access
check_reverse_client_hostname_mx_access
check_reverse_client_hostname_ns_access
Basically, with all SMTP server
li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 21.09.2014 um 02:30 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
thank you - looks promising!
could you attach this as unified diff-file?
The patch is unified diff format. It just does not have some of the
garbage that some version control systems add around it.
Am 21.09.2014 um 02:43 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 21.09.2014 um 02:30 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
thank you - looks promising!
could you attach this as unified diff-file?
The patch is unified diff format. It just does not have some of the
garbage that some
li...@rhsoft.net:
rpmbuild refuses :-(
You need a different patch for 2.11 and earlier. See
earlier follow-up
thanks - after change the patch it get applied
may take some time for feedback because postscreen
is so damned good in reject junk before smtpd :-)
To impersonate remote
Am 21.09.2014 um 03:08 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
rpmbuild refuses :-(
You need a different patch for 2.11 and earlier. See
earlier follow-up
thanks - after change the patch it get applied
may take some time for feedback because postscreen
is so damned good in reject junk
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 04:42:01AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:58:17PM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
I used fetchmail to retreive email from the university and it hands off
the local system which cause the mail to try to be forward to
localhost.com. Obviously
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 03:13:51AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
On 19 Sep 2014, at 20:58 , Ruben Safir ru...@mrbrklyn.com wrote:
I used fetchmail to retreive email from the university and it hands off
the local system which cause the mail to try to be forward to
localhost.com. Obviously I've made
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 01:05:43AM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 04:42:01AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:58:17PM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
I used fetchmail to retreive email from the university and it hands off
the local system which
17 matches
Mail list logo
