Hi there,
I configured a postfix version 2.11 on ubuntu 14.04 LTS x64
When I send an email to gmail account and other (like hotmail.it) the
emails end up in the spam box (the IP domain is not blacklisted)
I would know why. A normal user can send an email only with starttls
authentication (I activa
Paolo De Michele:
> Hi there,
>
> I configured a postfix version 2.11 on ubuntu 14.04 LTS x64
> When I send an email to gmail account and other (like hotmail.it) the
> emails end up in the spam box (the IP domain is not blacklisted)
> I would know why.
Set up an IPv4 DNS PTR record that resolves
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Paolo De Michele
wrote:
> Anyone can help me please?
Not enough details (log, domains, anything), but this
Received: from [172.16.2.153]
(dynamic-adsl-78-15-215-90.clienti.tiscali.it. [78.15.215.90])
could be a good start point.
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
We would like to use Postfix to relay mail for one domain (@domain1.net)
and deliver mail for all other domains directly. I started looking at
Transport Maps.
RELAY:
u...@domain1.net mail.domain1.net
ALL OTHER:
u...@yahoo.com
u...@hotmail.com
u...@gmail.com
I hope this makes sense. I can cla
I'd like to know how can I configure a postfix instance to send a copy of
each mail received for another postfix instance.
I want to use this because I have a working mailserver and I want to test a
new one, freshly installed. So, I could continue using my current
mailserver while testing and tuni
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:48:02PM -0200, Carlos Alberto M. B. wrote:
> I'd like to know how can I configure a postfix instance to send a copy of
> each mail received for another postfix instance.
>
> I want to use this because I have a working mailserver and I want to test a
> new one, freshly i
Eric:
> u...@domain1.net mail.domain1.net
> ALL OTHER:
> u...@yahoo.com
> u...@hotmail.com
> u...@gmail.com
Remove the relayhost setting from main.cf. Postfix by default
delivers mail for u...@domain1.net to domain1.net mailhost, and it
by default delivers mail for yahoo, hotmail, etc., via the
On 26/11/14 15:03, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Paolo De Michele
> wrote:
>
>> Anyone can help me please?
> Not enough details (log, domains, anything), but this
>
> Received: from [172.16.2.153]
> (dynamic-adsl-78-15-215-90.clienti.tiscali.it. [78.15.215.90])
>
> cou
We are running a couple of Postfix servers as SMTP gateways for our
Exchange 2010 servers. In other words, Postfix is running purely as a
relay host.
What we need to do is to capture emails sent to specific email
addresses, grab a copy for processing via Perl or PHP scripts, while
passing on the e
Aaron Clausen:
> We are running a couple of Postfix servers as SMTP gateways for our
> Exchange 2010 servers. In other words, Postfix is running purely as a
> relay host.
>
> What we need to do is to capture emails sent to specific email
> addresses, grab a copy for processing via Perl or PHP scri
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Aaron Clausen:
>> We are running a couple of Postfix servers as SMTP gateways for our
>> Exchange 2010 servers. In other words, Postfix is running purely as a
>> relay host.
>>
>> What we need to do is to capture emails sent to specific email
Postfix snapshot 2.12-20141126 changes the error messages for domains
with a NULL MX record from "invalid DNS reply" to "domain does not
receive mail".
This also introduces a new SMTP server configuration parameter
nullmx_reject_code (default: 556) and updates t
On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 09:00:14 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
> Postfix snapshot 2.12-20141126 changes the error messages for domains
> with a NULL MX record from "invalid DNS reply" to "domain does not
> receive mail".
>
> This also introduces a new
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 09:19:41PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I'm surprised you chose to introduce as a default an undefined
> code point. RFC 5321 (and its predecessors) have pretty strong
> language against use of new reply codes and the current IETF draft
> specifies use of 550 in most ca
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 03:40:21AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> You must have been napping upthread.
If still puzzled:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-10#appendix-A.2
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-klensin-smtp-521code-02#section-4
--
Viktor.
On Thursday, November 27, 2014 03:43:56 AM Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 03:40:21AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > You must have been napping upthread.
>
> If still puzzled:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-10#appendix-A.2
>
> https://tools.i
16 matches
Mail list logo
