Hi, i'm trying to set up a secondary mx.
Can i configure postfix to accept mail only when primary is offline?
This resolve spam problem.
Thanks Matteo
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 06:10:25PM +0100, Matteo Lanzoni wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to set up a secondary mx.
> Can I configure postfix to accept mail only when primary is offline?
Instead implement equivalent anti-spam measure on both primary and
secondary systems, with working recipient validation
2014-11-30 18:13 GMT+01:00 Viktor Dukhovni :
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 06:10:25PM +0100, Matteo Lanzoni wrote:
>
>> Hi, I'm trying to set up a secondary mx.
>> Can I configure postfix to accept mail only when primary is offline?
>
> Instead implement equivalent anti-spam measure on both primary and
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 06:19:36PM +0100, Matteo Lanzoni wrote:
> Anyway do you know if Postfix can be configured as I need/want.
Dynamic configuration of access control policy that depends on
varying external conditions requires a policy service or milter.
It is of course also possible to run a
Am 30.11.2014 um 18:19 schrieb Matteo Lanzoni:
2014-11-30 18:13 GMT+01:00 Viktor Dukhovni :
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 06:10:25PM +0100, Matteo Lanzoni wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to set up a secondary mx.
Can I configure postfix to accept mail only when primary is offline?
Instead implement equival
Thanks. After some twiddling, I stumbled on the same solution I think.
MAIN.CF
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory = /etc/postfix
inet_interfaces = all
mailbox_size_limit = 0
mydestination = ourrelay-cb01, localhos
I've been googling a while to find a resolution to this but am not having
the best of luck.
I have a web app trying to connect to postfix to send mail via TLS. It
fails right after authentication. I find a BUNCH of these in the log:
Nov 30 10:10:32 hosting1 postfix/smtpd[11990]: connect from
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 09:32:43AM -0700, Steffan A. Cline wrote:
> I have a web app trying to connect to postfix to send mail via TLS. It
> fails right after authentication.
Actually, no, it (what you show from the logs) fails during the
TLS handshake, which should precede authentication.
> I f
I have added this text at the end of "Non-SMTPD Milter applications":
Wietse
Signing internally-generated bounce messages
Postfix normally does not apply content filters to mail that is forwarded or
aliased internally, or to mail that is generated internally such as bounces or
Postmaster
Where does Postfix get its list of trusted certificate issuers? I just
caught:
Nov 30 16:29:24 z9m9z postfix/smtp[21643]: certificate verification
failed for ibehy-com.mail.protection.outlook.com[207.46.163.138]:25:
untrusted issuer /C=IE/O=Baltimore/OU=CyberTrust/CN=Baltimore CyberTrust
Roo
Robert Moskowitz:
> Where does Postfix get its list of trusted certificate issuers?
You decide:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#tls_append_default_CA
Wietse
On 11/30/2014 04:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert Moskowitz:
Where does Postfix get its list of trusted certificate issuers?
You decide:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#tls_append_default_CA
Thanks. Now I just have to get a CA list onto the server. As well as
what format the list
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 06:30:51PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 11/30/2014 04:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >Robert Moskowitz:
> >>Where does Postfix get its list of trusted certificate issuers?
> >You decide:
> >http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#tls_append_default_CA
>
> Thanks. Now
On 11/30/2014 06:50 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 06:30:51PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/30/2014 04:55 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert Moskowitz:
Where does Postfix get its list of trusted certificate issuers?
You decide:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 07:00:15PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >I am not suggesting you do this, but since you asked...
>
> As so often, Viktor, you get right to the 'key' point. Yes, why bother. Is
> it any faster if it has a lot of root CA files to check against?
The performance cost is
On 11/30/2014 07:12 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 07:00:15PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am not suggesting you do this, but since you asked...
As so often, Viktor, you get right to the 'key' point. Yes, why bother. Is
it any faster if it has a lot of root CA files
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I have added this text at the end of "Non-SMTPD Milter applications":
>
> Wietse
>
> Signing internally-generated bounce messages
>
> Postfix normally does not apply content filters to mail that is forwarded or
> aliased internally, o
17 matches
Mail list logo