Andrew Beverley:
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:58 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
What other TLS settings do you consider required? Postfix does not
need a client certificate for sending email.
My mistake. I'd added in some of those settings when I couldn't get it
working. In actual fact I was
M. Fioretti:
As confirmation of my earlier answer, please note the Received: and
Receive-SPF headers of the
rejected message, which do NOT report 81.88.62.172 as source, or spf
failures... So THEY
acknowledge I emailed from 213.179.193.33, THEY say SPF-pass, then THEY
reject because of
Hi,
I've upgraded from postfix-2.10.5 on fedora20 to postfix-3.0.1 on
fedora22 and receiving the backwards-compatibility warning. I've checked
all of the settings on the COMPATIBILITY_README page, and adjusted the
relay_domains setting, which was the only one that applied to my config.
I'm
On 2015-06-08 17:46, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
Have you followed the link in the error message, and read the
explanation?
Of course I have. But, with all respect, it have to ask if YOU read my
email.
If I send email from the same computer, webmail etc.. I only get spf
failure
from that and
On 2015-06-08 20:06, M. Fioretti wrote:
On 2015-06-08 17:46, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
Have you followed the link in the error message, and read the
explanation?
Of course I have. But, with all respect, it have to ask if YOU read my
email.
As confirmation of my earlier answer, please note
Hi,
I've upgraded from postfix-2.10.5 on fedora20 to postfix-3.0.1 on
fedora22 and receiving the backwards-compatibility warning. I've checked
all of the settings on the COMPATIBILITY_README page, and adjusted the
relay_domains setting, which was the only one that applied to my config.
I'm
Alex Regan:
Hi,
I've upgraded from postfix-2.10.5 on fedora20 to postfix-3.0.1 on
fedora22 and receiving the backwards-compatibility warning. I've checked
all of the settings on the COMPATIBILITY_README page, and adjusted the
relay_domains setting, which was the only one that applied to
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:42 AM, DTNX Postmaster postmas...@dtnx.net wrote:
On 09 Jun 2015, at 05:20, Michael B Allen iop...@gmail.com wrote:
I have never setup SPF records before. I have one server doing
everything although it has two names www.busicorp.com and
mail.busicorp.com.
My
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:30:59PM -0400, Alex Regan wrote:
Jun 8 21:20:03 mail02 postfix[22018]: Postfix is running with
backwards-compatible default settings
Meaning the compatibility level is not set the requisuite minimum
value. This applies whether or not the relevant parameters have
On 08 Jun 2015, at 20:14, M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net wrote:
On 2015-06-08 20:06, M. Fioretti wrote:
On 2015-06-08 17:46, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
Have you followed the link in the error message, and read the
explanation?
Of course I have. But, with all respect, it have to ask if YOU
On 09 Jun 2015, at 05:20, Michael B Allen iop...@gmail.com wrote:
I have never setup SPF records before. I have one server doing
everything although it has two names www.busicorp.com and
mail.busicorp.com.
My understanding is the following is probably what I want:
v=spf1 mx ~all
I think we're wandering into the reasons why SPF discussions are
usually off-limits on this mailinglist, again.
For further assistance with setting up SPF, and debugging the quirks
you'll run into, use the support resources dedicated to the topic, such
as the ones listed on the OpenSPF
I have never setup SPF records before. I have one server doing
everything although it has two names www.busicorp.com and
mail.busicorp.com.
My understanding is the following is probably what I want:
v=spf1 mx ~all
Would you agree?
Mike
Yes mate, bingo!
You saved another day that I'd probably spend on troubleshooting this.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#masquerade_domains
This is the answer
P.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Peter wrote:
On 06/08/2015 08:58 PM, Peter wrote:
I use sendmail -f
On 06/08/2015 08:58 PM, Peter wrote:
I use sendmail -f nore...@mail.example.com to send emails
I hope you actually have some sort of program, script or human
monitoring that address to handle bounces.
I see that the from address is already altered in the
postfix log file to
I have been changing my mailing addresses from example.com to sub
domains - say mail.example.com to configure no-reply addresses there.
I use sendmail -f nore...@mail.example.com to send emails to make sure
the Return-Path is correct. My mail delivery chain looks as follows:
SENDING SERVER --
Alex Regan:
Hi,
I've upgraded from postfix-2.10.5 on fedora20 to postfix-3.0.1 on
fedora22 and receiving the backwards-compatibility warning. I've checked
all of the settings on the COMPATIBILITY_README page, and adjusted the
relay_domains setting, which was the only one that applied to
Greetings,
I had my SPF/Dkim setup all set, also thanks to help from this list..
until 2/3 days ago. Since then, I have received 2/3 rejected messages,
from unrelated servers, all very similar to the one below, from which
I have only removed the subject and original body.
I sent that email 10
Hi,
Just a quick suggestion for the excellent Postfix documentation.
Given that SASL authentication over TLS is becoming more prevalent, I
think it would be worth adding a small note to this section:
http://www.postfix.org/SOHO_README.html#client_sasl_enable
stating that smtp_use_tls = yes is
On 08 Jun 2015, at 18:03, M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net wrote:
I had my SPF/Dkim setup all set, also thanks to help from this list..
until 2/3 days ago. Since then, I have received 2/3 rejected messages,
from unrelated servers, all very similar to the one below, from which
I have only
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 04:35:01PM +0100, Andrew Beverley wrote:
Given that SASL authentication over TLS is becoming more prevalent, I
think it would be worth adding a small note to this section:
http://www.postfix.org/SOHO_README.html#client_sasl_enable
stating that smtp_use_tls = yes is
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:58 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
What other TLS settings do you consider required? Postfix does not
need a client certificate for sending email.
My mistake. I'd added in some of those settings when I couldn't get it
working. In actual fact I was missing:
22 matches
Mail list logo
