Re: Postfix migration 2.11 to 3.1, Thunderbird, and antispam questions

On 14 Apr 2016, at 15:49, David Mehler wrote: Lastly, related to antispam, currently I'm running MailScanner, So you don't really care about your email? There's a warning about the inherently risky and unsupported mechanism MailScanner uses to get mail from Postfix at

Re: Postfix migration 2.11 to 3.1, Thunderbird, and antispam questions

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 03:49:32PM -0400, David Mehler wrote: > # Set the smtputf8 option because the dovecot service was not working > smtputf8_enable = no > compatibility_level = Do not dial up compatibility to 11. That's a bad idea, set it only to the actual compatibility level of your

Postfix migration 2.11 to 3.1, Thunderbird, and antispam questions

Hello, I'm running a FreeBSD 10.3 AMD64 system. I just upgraded Postfix from 2.11 to 3.1. I'm using Dovecot for Sasl authentication via mysql and email storage via maildir. The system can receive emails from the internet via port 25, (running postscreen), and store them on disk using dovecot, no

NEWSFLASH: DANE TLSA records published for web.de!

The web.de domain has just published DANE TLSA records for its MX hosts. This follows earlier "pilot" deployments with the smaller mail.com and mail.de domains. web.de. IN MX 100 mx-ha02.web.de. ; AD=1 _25._tcp.mx-ha02.web.de. IN TLSA 3 1 1

Re: Condition negation

16-04-14 9:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Wietse Venema: John Allen: Is there a way of negating a smtpd condition. For example if I were to apply c "check_sender_access sql_lookup" under submission in master.cf would it be possible to say something like !check_check_acess ... under smtpd

Re: smtpd_command_filter regex help

On 4/13/2016 10:26 PM, Michael Nguyen wrote: > So, I'm having an issue with "Bad Sender Address Syntax" errors. The > errors are from a variety of formatted email address including some > strange ones like . At first, I would > shrug my shoulders to them but my

Mail clients and forwarding (was Re: SV: Special method required for Gmail dkim/spf verification)

Sebastian Nielsen wrote: > Another way, that is the preferred RFC way to do it, is to encapsulate the > mail in a new message/rfc822 container, and adding Fwd: to the original > subject of the outside container. > (This is how most mail clients "forward" a message) I can't speak to most of the

Re: Condition negation

Wietse Venema: > John Allen: > > Is there a way of negating a smtpd condition. > > For example if I were to apply c "check_sender_access sql_lookup" under > > submission in master.cf would it be possible to say something like > > !check_check_acess ... under smtpd restrctions > > > > The idea

Re: Condition negation

John Allen: > Is there a way of negating a smtpd condition. > For example if I were to apply c "check_sender_access sql_lookup" under > submission in master.cf would it be possible to say something like > !check_check_acess ... under smtpd restrctions > > The idea being that if example.com is

Re: header re-write not working - message-id

Thank you Wietse. On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Thomas kinghorn: > > Good morning list. > > > > I hope someone can assist with a problem. > > > > We have a device which uses a GSM sim and a non-configurable device > setting. > > It is currently