> On Feb 18, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2017, at 8:11 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
>> wrote:
>>
>
>> If you have a pre-Sierra MacOS/X machine, perhaps building 3.1.4 there
>> and copying the binaries will yield the same behaviour you see with
>> 3.1.1?
>
> I do but i
> On Feb 18, 2017, at 8:11 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 07:37:27AM -1000, Larry Stone wrote:
>
>> Viktor, did you ever figure out the logging issue?
>
> No. Insufficient time to figure out the innards of the new Apple
> logging subsystem. My laptop is just for Po
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 07:37:27AM -1000, Larry Stone wrote:
> Viktor, did you ever figure out the logging issue?
No. Insufficient time to figure out the innards of the new Apple
logging subsystem. My laptop is just for Postfix development, so
the issue has not as yet warranted much effort on m
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 05:43:03PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> I am trying to diagnose why messages from on system fail to arrive
> whereas identical messages from another similar system arrive
> successfully.
>
> Both systems are single board computers running postfix 2.9.6 under
> Debian. The m
I am trying to diagnose why messages from on system fail to arrive
whereas identical messages from another similar system arrive
successfully.
Both systems are single board computers running postfix 2.9.6 under
Debian. The main.cf on both systems is identical. Both systems are
connecting to the
Viktor, did you ever figure out the logging issue? I just tried upgrading my
test system to Postfix 3.1.4 (from 3.1.1) and the logging started to go to the
new Apple logging system. Immediately fell back to 3.1.1 and the logging is
back to /var/log/mail.log.
My initial make command (based on wh
On 2016-12-27 09:45, John Fawcett wrote:
On 12/26/2016 10:35 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
John Fawcett:
so long as the loop continues in the presence of a zero return
code from mysql_next_result() and mysql_store_result is called for
each one we will stay in sync. With the break above we will be ok
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 11:30:08PM +1300, Peter wrote:
> On 18/02/17 22:56, Chris Green wrote:
> > The older (2.9.6) and newer (3.1.0) postfix versions that I'm using
> > are connecting to the same smarthost. I don't seem to be able to
> > connect from the 3.1.0 version to the submission service o
On 18/02/17 22:56, Chris Green wrote:
> The older (2.9.6) and newer (3.1.0) postfix versions that I'm using
> are connecting to the same smarthost. I don't seem to be able to
> connect from the 3.1.0 version to the submission service on 587 for
> some reason.
At a WAG you have smtp_tls_wrappermod
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 06:11:44PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > On Feb 17, 2017, at 5:33 PM, Chris Green wrote:
> >
> > OK, so the older version is using SMTP STARTTLS which runs on port 587
>
> This is how TLS has worked in MTA-to-MTA SMTP for the last > 15 years.
>
> https://too
10 matches
Mail list logo
