Re: Running a transport action only as a catch-all

2017-05-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Andrew Beverley: > Normally I would avoid a catch-all for the obvious reasons, but we're > undertaking a migration, and for a short period we want to have the > Postfix server relay to another MX server any messages that it has no > specific action for (and that it would otherwise normally reject).

Running a transport action only as a catch-all

2017-05-10 Thread Andrew Beverley
Dear all, Is there a way that I can specify that a transport rule should only be carried out as a "catch all" for email addresses that are not otherwise delivered locally? Normally I would avoid a catch-all for the obvious reasons, but we're undertaking a migration, and for a short period we want

smtpd_*_rate_limit and anvil time unit

2017-05-10 Thread Rosenbaum, Larry M.
We are considering using smtpd_client_message_rate_limit on our central (internal) mail servers to protect against mail floods when some departmental server goes crazy. Since normal mail from any particular client sometimes comes in bursts, I am considering increasing anvil_rate_time_unit. Are t

Re: Restarting milter application

2017-05-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Purushotham Nayak: > Hi All, > > I have a question about the correct way to restart a milter application. > > I'm using postfix 2.6.6 with a milter application that was built using > sendmail's libmilter (8.14.7). The problem I'm having is when I need to > restart the milter application (due to a

Re: Issues with a Rewriting Gateway

2017-05-10 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On May 10, 2017, at 6:34 AM, Dennis Weber wrote: > > Now there is only one thing left: When I send an appointment from an Exchange > server, relayed over the Postfix gateway, there are no generic rules for > rewriting applied. Do you have a last hint for me, in which direction I should > focus

Re: always_bcc only after reinjection from amavis

2017-05-10 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On May 10, 2017, at 12:02 PM, btb wrote: > > i'd like to use always_bcc, to copy all messages to an archival system, > but only after the messages return from the content filter server. > > how can i do this? Enable always_bcc via a master.cf entry for a suitable cleanup(8) instance: http:/

always_bcc only after reinjection from amavis

2017-05-10 Thread btb
hi- i have a server which relays mail to our content filter server [amavis/spamassassin/etc], via: content_filter=lmtp-filter:[mfa.${mydomain}]:lmtp-filter-internal and returns, via: # reinjection from content filter smtp-reinject-internal inet n - - - - smtpd

Re: policyd_spf

2017-05-10 Thread marco
Hello. Tnx, however I'm not using the python version but the compiled one, and there is nowhere a policyd-spd.conf file nor a man page. Marco Il 10. 05. 17 16:49, Dominic Raferd ha scritto: On 10 May 2017 at 15:27, marco > wrote: Is there any way

Re: policyd_spf

2017-05-10 Thread Dominic Raferd
On 10 May 2017 at 15:27, marco wrote: > Is there any way of having in the log the debugging info for the > policyd_spf? > I have been using for a test smtp -v in master.cf, but this is producing > an enormous quantity of data, and policyd_spf -d in master.cf fails with > errors. > My target is to

policyd_spf

2017-05-10 Thread marco
Hello. Is there any way of having in the log the debugging info for the policyd_spf? I have been using for a test smtp -v in master.cf, but this is producing an enormous quantity of data, and policyd_spf -d in master.cf fails with errors. My target is to have a first impression after the i

AW: Issues with a Rewriting Gateway

2017-05-10 Thread Dennis Weber
Hi Viktor, You saved me, the rewrite is finally working as expected! :) I thought the "smtp" in the transport map is linked to the protocol used and not the transport agent from my master.cf file. Everything is working fine now, thanks a lot again! Now there is only one thing left: When I send

Re: Problems with aliases

2017-05-10 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On May 10, 2017, at 3:43 AM, Doug Hardie > wrote: > > I have spent quite a bit of time in the logs, and I don't find anything else > that seems to indicate an issue. The problem occurred with all outgoing mail > to multiple domains. I have no idea what to look for. There are numerous > e