@lbutlr:
I know that the Berkeley DB still works in postfix if compiled with
that option, but is it the best choice for a new install of postfix?
no
I have only a couple of tables that use it, but since I am moving
entirely to a new machine and new compiles, I don't want to drag
along an
I know that the Berkeley DB still works in postfix if compiled with that
option, but is it the best choice for a new install of postfix?
I have only a couple of tables that use it, but since I am moving entirely to a
new machine and new compiles, I don't want to drag along an "old" format if I
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
on some systems I maintain there was "VERBOSE=yes" and procmail logged
path to the created file within maildir. try setting VERBOSE=yes at the
begin of your procmail rc file.
Matus,
Thanks for clarifying. Here is ~/.procmailrc:
LOGFILE=/ho
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 06:26:52AM +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * J Doe :
> > I am looking to use either Cyrus or Dovecot for both SASL authentication and
> > IMAP. While Postfix 3.1.0 supports both, I was wondering which to prefer if
> > security is my most important deciding factor ? Doe
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
what's in the /home/rshepard/procmail/log ?
On 17.01.18 05:41, Rich Shepard wrote:
That is what I sent in the message: the log content for that specific
test message not delivered to my inbox. I deleted the lines showing procmail
testing for
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
what's in the /home/rshepard/procmail/log ?
Matus,
That is what I sent in the message: the log content for that specific
test message not delivered to my inbox. I deleted the lines showing procmail
testing for matches to mail list addresses
> On Jan 16, 2018, at 11:26 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>
> The Cyrus SASL project has been discontinued. I recommend not to use security
> relevant software that is unmaintained. Use Dovecot as password verification
> service for Postfix.
There seems to still be activity. I am subscribed t
On 17 Jan 2018 12:24 p.m., "Dominic Raferd" wrote:
> I started a conversation with my isp and ask them whole subnet's status
and
> spammers in the network. Talos gave enough details about ip address in my
> subnet. They do not believe that Microsoft categorize subnets. Actually,
> their answer wa
On 16.01.18 13:21, Rich Shepard wrote:
Here is the log entries from a test message sent recently to
rshep...@appl-ecosys.com:
procmail: Unlocking "personal.lock"
From rshep...@twodogs.us Tue Jan 16 08:50:05 2018
Subject: test
Folder: personal
> I started a conversation with my isp and ask them whole subnet's status and
> spammers in the network. Talos gave enough details about ip address in my
> subnet. They do not believe that Microsoft categorize subnets. Actually,
> their answer was quite funny. They said, "why ms want to do that ?"
On 16 Jan 2018 3:12 p.m., "jin&hitman&Barracuda"
wrote:
On 16 Jan 2018 2:34 p.m., "Dominic Raferd" wrote:
Please do not top-post on this mailing list...
On 16 January 2018 at 11:20, jin&hitman&Barracuda
wrote:
>
> I did not realize that nonexist host names. I believe they basically
ignore
11 matches
Mail list logo
