On 3 Mar 2018, at 14:25, J Doe wrote:
Should I then continue to use postscreen for the zombie detection but
then move my DNSRBL entries to smtpd restrictions ?
Apologies for belabouring the point - I’m just not understanding.
Not all DNSBLs are equivalent. SOME are suited for use in
On Sun, 04 Mar 2018 21:31:44 +0100,
Postfix User wrote:
> Maybe I am missing something; however, I have been running Postfix
> 3.4-(whatever) on FreeBSD-11 and above since it was released.
You either built the postfix port (which already includes these
changes) or
On Sun, 4 Mar 2018 19:06:52 +0100, no@s...@mgedv.net stated:
>hi wietse & postfix-folks, thanks for the best MX out there - still!
>feel free to apply this patch if reqd.
>
>--- ./src/util/sys_defs.h.orig 2017-02-02 02:31:15.0 +0100
>+++ ./src/util/sys_defs.h 2017-04-03
On Sun, 04 Mar 2018 19:06:52 +0100,
"no@s...@mgedv.net" wrote:
>
> hi wietse & postfix-folks, thanks for the best MX out there - still!
> feel free to apply this patch if reqd.
These changes are part of the FreeBSD port for years.
no@s...@mgedv.net:
> hi wietse & postfix-folks, thanks for the best MX out there - still!
> feel free to apply this patch if reqd.
Thanks. I gather that there are no changes in the behaviof of
libraries or kernel. I'd like to download and install FreeBSD11 in
a VM, but that will have to wait
hi wietse & postfix-folks, thanks for the best MX out there - still!
feel free to apply this patch if reqd.
--- ./src/util/sys_defs.h.orig 2017-02-02 02:31:15.0 +0100
+++ ./src/util/sys_defs.h 2017-04-03 15:57:19.205806000 +0200
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#if defined(FREEBSD2) ||
Hi LuKreme,
> On Mar 4, 2018, at 8:44 AM, LuKreme wrote:
>
> Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it?
> --
> My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways
> to reject even more mail. I'm up to about 97% now.
>
It’s a
LuKreme:
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 18:29, J Doe wrote:
> > postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords
> >smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
>
> Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it?
Good if used by the right client (who needs this nowadays?), otherwise
ERTN it
On Mar 3, 2018, at 14:31, Ben Lavender wrote:
> I’m looking to disable submission on port 25 and therefore have postfix as a
> relay only server.
You SHOULD disable submission on port 25, but that doesn't mean you have to be
a relay-only server. Put submission on port 587.
On Feb 27, 2018, at 18:29, J Doe wrote:
> postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords
>smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it?
--
My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways to
reject even
Ben Lavender:
> Hello,
>
> I?m looking to disable submission on port 25 and therefore have postfix
> as a relay only server. Is this possible?
It used to be fairly common to put Postfix as a relay betweem
the Internet and a corporate network (read: Microsoft Exchange).
For the Postfix side
11 matches
Mail list logo