Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-04 Thread Bill Cole
On 3 Mar 2018, at 14:25, J Doe wrote: Should I then continue to use postscreen for the zombie detection but then move my DNSRBL entries to smtpd restrictions ? Apologies for belabouring the point - I’m just not understanding. Not all DNSBLs are equivalent. SOME are suited for use in

Re: compile postfix 3.x from source on freebsd 11.x [patch]

2018-03-04 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
On Sun, 04 Mar 2018 21:31:44 +0100, Postfix User wrote: > Maybe I am missing something; however, I have been running Postfix > 3.4-(whatever) on FreeBSD-11 and above since it was released. You either built the postfix port (which already includes these changes) or

Re: compile postfix 3.x from source on freebsd 11.x [patch]

2018-03-04 Thread Postfix User
On Sun, 4 Mar 2018 19:06:52 +0100, no@s...@mgedv.net stated: >hi wietse & postfix-folks, thanks for the best MX out there - still! >feel free to apply this patch if reqd. > >--- ./src/util/sys_defs.h.orig 2017-02-02 02:31:15.0 +0100 >+++ ./src/util/sys_defs.h 2017-04-03

Re: compile postfix 3.x from source on freebsd 11.x [patch]

2018-03-04 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
On Sun, 04 Mar 2018 19:06:52 +0100, "no@s...@mgedv.net" wrote: > > hi wietse & postfix-folks, thanks for the best MX out there - still! > feel free to apply this patch if reqd. These changes are part of the FreeBSD port for years.

Re: compile postfix 3.x from source on freebsd 11.x [patch]

2018-03-04 Thread Wietse Venema
no@s...@mgedv.net: > hi wietse & postfix-folks, thanks for the best MX out there - still! > feel free to apply this patch if reqd. Thanks. I gather that there are no changes in the behaviof of libraries or kernel. I'd like to download and install FreeBSD11 in a VM, but that will have to wait

compile postfix 3.x from source on freebsd 11.x [patch]

2018-03-04 Thread no@s...@mgedv.net
hi wietse & postfix-folks, thanks for the best MX out there - still! feel free to apply this patch if reqd. --- ./src/util/sys_defs.h.orig 2017-02-02 02:31:15.0 +0100 +++ ./src/util/sys_defs.h 2017-04-03 15:57:19.205806000 +0200 @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ #if defined(FREEBSD2) ||

Re: ETRN use and Postfix configuration

2018-03-04 Thread J Doe
Hi LuKreme, > On Mar 4, 2018, at 8:44 AM, LuKreme wrote: > > Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it? > -- > My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways > to reject even more mail. I'm up to about 97% now. > It’s a

Re: ETRN use and Postfix configuration

2018-03-04 Thread Wietse Venema
LuKreme: > On Feb 27, 2018, at 18:29, J Doe wrote: > > postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords > >smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords > > Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it? Good if used by the right client (who needs this nowadays?), otherwise ERTN it

Re: Disable submission on port 25

2018-03-04 Thread LuKreme
On Mar 3, 2018, at 14:31, Ben Lavender wrote: > I’m looking to disable submission on port 25 and therefore have postfix as a > relay only server. You SHOULD disable submission on port 25, but that doesn't mean you have to be a relay-only server. Put submission on port 587.

Re: ETRN use and Postfix configuration

2018-03-04 Thread LuKreme
On Feb 27, 2018, at 18:29, J Doe wrote: > postscreen_discard_ehlo_keywords >smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords Isn't ETRN a good thing? What's the benefit from disabling it? -- My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways to reject even

Re: Disable submission on port 25

2018-03-04 Thread Wietse Venema
Ben Lavender: > Hello, > > I?m looking to disable submission on port 25 and therefore have postfix > as a relay only server. Is this possible? It used to be fairly common to put Postfix as a relay betweem the Internet and a corporate network (read: Microsoft Exchange). For the Postfix side